「providers」の検索結果

Register a custom WooCommerce shipping provider — extend AbstractShippingProvider and add it via the woocommerce_fulfillment_shipping_providers filter (WC 10.1+). Distinct from shipping methods (rate at checkout) — a provider is a carrier identity (UPS, FedEx, DHL, your custom carrier) used by the Fulfillments system for tracking URLs, tracking-number pattern detection, country-pair support, and the orders-list filter. Required methods get_key / get_name / get_icon / get_tracking_url, with optional shipping-from / shipping-to / try_parse_tracking_number. Registration accepts class names (resolved via the DI container) or pre-built instances, keyed by get_key. Use when integrating a private carrier, fulfillment service, or any tracking-aware shipping identity. Triggers on AbstractShippingProvider, woocommerce_fulfillment_shipping_providers, FulfillmentUtils::get_shipping_providers, "shipping provider" in WooCommerce context, or carrier tracking integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Riverpod (v3.3.x) compile-safe state management for Flutter apps. Use when implementing @riverpod code generation providers, handling AsyncValue loading/error/data states, using ref.watch/ref.read/ref.listen, setting up ProviderScope, writing Notifier/AsyncNotifier classes, using FutureProvider/StreamProvider, applying autoDispose and family modifiers, combining providers, testing providers in isolation, scoping rebuilds with Consumer instead of ConsumerWidget, using ref.watch with select() for field-level precision, migrating from StateNotifierProvider or Riverpod 2.x patterns, handling Notifier resource lifecycle with ref.onDispose, or using experimental Mutation and offline persistence APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Flutter TabController crash when dynamically showing/hiding tabs. Use when: (1) TabController rebuild causes "SingleTickerProviderStateMixin but multiple tickers were created", (2) Tabs need to appear/disappear based on feature flags or async state, (3) TabController.length changes at runtime based on provider state. The fix is to use TickerProviderStateMixin instead of SingleTickerProviderStateMixin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redpanda's Agentic Data Plane: governance infrastructure for building, running, and governing AI agents and MCP servers, plus a proxying AI Gateway for LLM providers, operated via `rpk ai` and the ADP API. Use when creating or managing AI agents (managed or self-managed) via `rpk ai agent` or `AgentRegistryService`; configuring MCP servers (remote or managed catalog, code mode, auth); setting up LLM providers or querying models via `rpk ai llm`/`rpk ai model` or the AI Gateway proxy; or configuring budgets, guardrails, or Cedar access-control policies through the governance APIs. Also covers reading agent transcripts and spending insights, and wiring OAuth clients or providers to the aigw Authorization Server. For the separate rpk cloud mcp control-plane MCP server, see `/redpanda:rpk-cloud`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lists all inference providers offered during NemoClaw onboarding. Use when explaining which providers are available, what the onboard wizard presents, or how inference routing works. Trigger keywords - nemoclaw inference options, nemoclaw onboarding providers, nemoclaw inference routing, switch nemoclaw inference model, change inference runtime, nemoclaw local inference, ollama nemoclaw, vllm nemoclaw, local model server, openai compatible endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのDocker環境で一連の動作を確かめるテストを作成・変更するスキル。模擬サーバーと実サービスを使い分け、送信内容や最終応答まで検証します。

• DockerのE2Eテストを追加・変更
• 依存サービスへの送信内容を確認
• 実モデル提供サービスの動作検証

NestJSのAPIやサービスを設計・レビューするスキル。機能別のコード構成、入力検証、認証、例外処理、環境設定、テストを整理し、実運用に向けた実装を支援します。

• NestJSのAPI構成を決めたいとき
• 入力検証とアクセス制御の実装
• 例外処理と環境設定のレビュー

Manage provider connections from the CLI: list available/configured providers, add, test, test-all, validate, rotate API keys, and view per-provider metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds with and operates Pi, the minimal terminal coding harness. Use for installing Pi, configuring providers/models/settings/environment variables, creating Pi skills/extensions/packages/themes/prompt templates, embedding Pi through the SDK, integrating over RPC or JSON event streams, parsing sessions, running local models through the llama.cpp router, developing custom Pi providers and TUI components, or using ecosystem packages such as pi-subagents (delegation/orchestration), pi-mcp-adapter (MCP servers), pi-interview (interactive forms), and pi-web-access (web search, fetching, video understanding).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure AWS Verified Access to provide VPN-less zero trust network access to internal apps, combining identity trust providers (IAM Identity Center, Okta/OIDC), device posture providers (CrowdStrike, Jamf), Cedar policy authoring, and Terraform deployment. Use when replacing VPN access with ZTNA, writing Cedar access policies, or deploying Verified Access instances, groups, and endpoints across AWS accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement, modify, test, or document TypeScript provider packages under ts/packages/providers, including framework adapters for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, LangChain, Mastra, Vercel, LlamaIndex, Cloudflare, Claude Agent SDK, and TypeSafe. Use for provider-specific TS work; do not use for core-only changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, test, or package Python provider adapters under python/providers, including framework-specific dependencies, public imports, type inference, and provider metadata. Use for Python provider work only; use python-sdk for core SDK changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a website or web app from the sandbox to a public URL, and deploy to cloud providers — get a live link to share, ship a static site or SPA, put a built site online, or deploy a framework app / container. Use when the user says 'publish this', 'deploy it', 'put it online', 'give me a live URL', 'host this', 'share a preview link', or wants to make a site/app they (or you) just built reachable on the web. Covers the zero-account instant path (Cloudflare) and permanent hosting (Vercel, incl. any Dockerfile). Also owns the publish GUARDRAILS: never publish unprompted, how to honestly take a site down, the runtime-dependency and data-persistence checks, and the mandatory pre-publish security review. Prefers Kortix Apps (a stable Kortix URL behind Kortix sign-in) when the project has Apps on. Points at kortix-marketplace for other providers and deeper provider-specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure OAuth providers (Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, GitHub, etc.) to work with portless local dev URLs. Use when setting up OAuth redirect URIs, fixing "redirect_uri_mismatch" or "invalid redirect" errors, configuring sign-in providers for local development, or when a provider rejects .localhost subdomains. Triggers include "OAuth not working with portless", "redirect URI mismatch", "Google/Apple/Microsoft sign-in fails locally", "configure OAuth for local dev", or any task involving OAuth callback URLs with portless domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive secrets extraction methodology targeting CI/CD environments across all major platforms. Covers environment variable extraction from build contexts, exploitation of vault and secrets-manager misconfigurations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), runner and agent token abuse for lateral movement, OIDC federation attacks exploiting trust relationships between CI/CD providers and cloud platforms, build log leakage analysis for inadvertently exposed credentials, cache poisoning techniques for credential exfiltration, platform-specific credential store exploitation (GitHub Actions secrets, GitLab CI variables, Jenkins credential providers), service connection and service account abuse in Azure DevOps and GCP, and Docker registry credential theft from build environments. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1552 (Unsecured Credentials) and its sub-techniques. Each section provides enumeration procedures, extraction techniques, and post-exploitation pivoting guidance for using recovered secrets to expand access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect whether an API endpoint is backed by genuine Claude (not a wrapper, proxy, or impersonator) using 9 weighted rule-based checks that mirror the claude-verify project. Also extracts injected system prompts from providers that override Claude's identity. Fully self-contained — copy the code below and run, no extra packages beyond httpx. Use when the user wants to verify a Claude API key or endpoint, check if a third-party Claude service is authentic, audit API providers for Claude authenticity, test multiple models in parallel, or discover what system prompt a provider has injected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up providers, combining requests, managing state disposal, passing arguments, performing side effects, or testing providers (Riverpod).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up providers, consuming state, optimizing rebuilds, using ProxyProvider, or migrating from deprecated providers (Provider package).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement reactive state management using Riverpod 3.x with code generation in Flutter. Use when defining providers, building AsyncNotifiers, or overriding providers in tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure DI, inject() usage, and providers in Angular. Use when configuring Angular dependency injection, using inject(), or defining providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, enrich, or research US professional-services firms — law, marketing, consulting, accounting, IT services, architecture, engineering, HR, PR, design, and similar B2B service providers. Triggers on requests like "find me a PPC agency in California", "shortlist three boutique IP law firms", "build a longlist of 50 mid-size IT consultancies", or "here are 12 agency domains — pull contact info and confirm which are US-based", even when the need is described indirectly without naming a category. Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog with filters for industry, services, location, size, ratings, and third-party listings. Skip when the user is asking for personal/consumer services for themselves (an individual's own legal, tax, or medical needs), non-US firms, individual freelancers, retail/ecommerce/SaaS-product companies, recruiting-an-employee tasks, or general web research that doesn't need a structured firm directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。