「sharpening」の検索結果

Maintain the 8 essential garden hand tools through sharpening, handle care, rust prevention, and seasonal storage. Covers bypass secateurs, hori-hori, hand fork, trowel, pruning saw, sharpening stone, watering can, and soil rake. Use after each garden session for quick cleaning, monthly during the growing season for sharpening and oiling, at end of season for winter storage preparation, before spring for pre-season readiness checks, or whenever a tool feels dull, stiff, or shows rust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

計画や設計を掘り下げる質問を重ね、内容を具体化しながら設計判断の記録と用語集も作ります。検討と文書化を同じ対話の中で進めたいときに使うスキルです。

• 質問に答えながら計画を詰めたいとき
• 対話で設計を掘り下げたいとき
• 検討中に設計判断を記録したいとき

計画や設計を練り直したいときに、踏み込んだ質問を重ねるインタビューを行うスキル。考えを具体化するための対話を、関連スキルの呼び出しで始めます。

• 質問を通じて計画を練り直したいとき
• インタビューで設計を検討したいとき
• 対話で初期の案を具体化したいとき

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AISTATS fit, comparing AISTATS with NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, UAI, COLT, JMLR, statistics journals, or application venues, identifying the statistical primitive of the contribution, and sharpening the AI-statistics framing before writing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when placing the contribution against the policy-evaluation literature and sharpening it as a policy answer for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Stakes the contribution and the policy-relevant "so what"; it does not write the full introduction or design the identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project fits AEJ: Economic Policy rather than J. Public Economics, AEJ: Applied, or AER, and when sharpening the policy question and its welfare stake for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Frames fit and the policy-question-first contribution; it does not design the identification or run estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when situating an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript within organization-theory conversations and sharpening the gap/tension it addresses. Positions the argument; it does not develop the core theory or write the methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution and the "so what" for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript once results exist. Frames the contribution; it does not develop the underlying theory or run analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a security project fits ACM CCS versus IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, NDSS, PETS, or a crypto/theory venue, identifying the security contribution type, and sharpening the threat model and attacker capability before writing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project fits ACL versus EMNLP, NAACL, EACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, COLM, or an ML venue, covering contribution typing for NLP work, long-versus-short paper choice, the annual theme track, Findings-tier expectations, and sharpening the computational-linguistics framing before writing starts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when framing or sharpening a topic for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — turning a generic "X affects Y" empirical idea into an accounting contribution anchored in China's institutional setting, accounting theory, and standard-setting / practice relevance. Use before literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAMAS fit, comparing AAMAS with AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and the JAAMAS journal, identifying whether the agents are truly the research object, naming the interaction primitive (solution concept, mechanism, coordination, negotiation), and sharpening the multiagent framing before writing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this first for any task involving images, pictures, photos, scans, frames, volumes, or visual data — including reading, writing, filtering, enhancing, denoising, sharpening, deblurring, thresholding, segmenting, masking, detecting, finding or counting objects, removing backgrounds, measuring, comparing, registering, stitching, aligning, cropping, resizing, transforming, or analyzing. Use for image I/O (TIFF, PNG, JPEG, RAW, HDR), histograms, edge detection, color processing, morphology, geometric transforms, deep learning for images, quality assessment, and 3-D volume processing. Also triggers when users describe image problems (dark, noisy, blurry, low contrast, uneven lighting, hazy, color cast) or data exploration tasks (folder of images, characterize data, understand format). Handles microscopy (cells, particles) and general scientific imaging. Routes to sibling skills for medical imaging (DICOM, NIfTI), hyperspectral data, and visual inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with hyperspectral and multispectral images in MATLAB. Covers reading/writing (ENVI, NITF, TIFF, Sentinel-2, Landsat, ASTER), ECOSTRESS spectral libraries, processing (calibration, atmospheric correction, denoising, sharpening, dimensionality reduction, endmember extraction, unmixing, target/anomaly detection, spectral indices, segmentation), labeling (Spectral Image Labeler app, ground truth objects, automation algorithms), and deep learning (pixel classification CNNs, unmixing autoencoders, transfer learning). Use when reading, writing, processing, analyzing, classifying, labeling, or applying deep learning to hyperspectral or multispectral images.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when positioning needs defining or sharpening — a statement built on Promise, Proof, and Path, a differentiation matrix against competitors, category entry points, a three-level message hierarchy, and tagline directions. Trigger on 'positioning', 'positioning statement', 'what makes us different', 'USP', 'why should customers choose us over them', 'we sound the same as everyone else'. Also use when the user can list features but not a reason to pick them. Not for — competitor teardown research, see `08-competitor-research-global`; how the brand sounds in writing, see `35-brand-voice-global`; the offer and its value stack, see `31-offer-design-global`; the launch built on it, see `59-go-to-market-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when enhancing, upscaling, restoring, denoising, sharpening, deinterlacing, stabilizing, motion-deblurring, colorizing, SDR-to-HDR converting, or frame-rate/slow-motion converting video (and secondarily images) with Topaz Labs — whether cleaning up AI-generated video, compressed UGC, or old archival footage, or building a generate-low-res-then-upscale delivery pipeline. Covers choosing the right named Topaz model for a specific footage problem, setting parameters, driving the Topaz Platform (Video/Image) REST API's async job lifecycle, judging when enhancement helps versus when it introduces artifacts (over-smoothing, temporal shimmer, face hallucination), and QA of enhanced output. Do not use for originating new video content, non-Topaz upscalers, or purely editorial cuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent still-image post-production skill for RAW/rendered intake, nondestructive development, exposure, white balance, tone, color, ICC proofing, masking, repair, compositing, truthful retouching by genre, generative disclosure, sharpening, noise, resampling, variants, metadata, export, QA, rights, and ethical finishing. Use when an agent must plan, perform, direct, or review still photography retouching and finishing for print, web, social, archive, publication, or client delivery; do not use for image-generation APIs, video grading, or campaign-specific production strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs conversion-copy writer: landing sections, email, microcopy, buttons, headlines, CTAs, variants, and anti-slop edits. Use when asked to write or rewrite conversion copy for one surface in one pass (a hero, a button set, an email subject, a README section, a product blurb) or when copy on a single surface needs sharpening before it ships. NOT FOR: the full writing stack with SEO and AI Engine Optimization (use johnny-suede-write); stripping AI patterns from text this skill did not write (use suede-deslop); a researched, multi-phase piece for a high-stakes public surface (use suede-ship-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze competing products and turn the market gap into credible positioning, messaging angles, and social campaign claims. Use when comparing competitors, writing alternative pages, sharpening product positioning, or planning campaigns against a category narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pinning down domain terminology, maintaining the domain model, or when a term conflicts or needs sharpening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a feature into well-defined, independently shippable slices — whether it's an epic that needs breaking apart or a single story that needs sharpening into a job story

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。