「side-by-side」の検索結果

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-Side Property Comparison — takes two addresses and compares across price, specs, rental income, neighborhood, and investment potential with a winner per category and overall recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wrap any HTML artifact with a side panel of live, parameterized controls — accent color, type scale, density, motion, theme — that rewrite CSS custom properties in real time and persist to localStorage. Lets the user explore variants of a design without re-prompting the agent. Use when the brief asks for "variants", "side-by-side options", "tweak this", "let me adjust", "live knobs", or "实时调参".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing, tagging, and publishing a Cline desktop app (apps/examples/desktop-app) release — stable (desktop-vX.Y.Z from main), beta (desktop-vX.Y.Z-beta.N from desktop-experimental, shipped as the side-by-side "Cline Beta" app), or nightly (artifact-only test build of main's HEAD, tagged desktop-nightly-<stamp> after it builds). Guides changelog drafting, version bumps in package.json + tauri.conf.json, tagging, and the desktop-publish GitHub workflow that builds, signs, notarizes, and updates the per-channel auto-update feed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis. Use when the user has multiple offers and wants to compare salary, equity, benefits, or total comp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any codebase into a beautiful, interactive single-page HTML course that teaches how the code works to non-technical people. Use this skill whenever someone wants to create an interactive course, tutorial, or educational walkthrough from a codebase or project. Also trigger when users mention 'turn this into a course,' 'explain this codebase interactively,' 'teach this code,' 'interactive tutorial from code,' 'codebase walkthrough,' 'learn from this codebase,' or 'make a course from this project.' This skill produces a stunning, self-contained HTML file with scroll-based navigation, animated visualizations, embedded quizzes, and code-with-plain-English side-by-side translations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill when BenchmarkDotNet (BDN) is involved in the task — creating, running, configuring, or reviewing BDN benchmarks. Also activate when microbenchmarking .NET code would be useful and BenchmarkDotNet is the likely tool. Consider activating when answering a .NET performance question requires measurement and BenchmarkDotNet may be needed. Covers microbenchmark design, BDN configuration and project setup, how to run BDN microbenchmarks efficiently and effectively, and using BDN for side-by-side performance comparisons. Do NOT use for profiling/tracing .NET code (dotnet-trace, PerfView), production telemetry, or load/stress testing (Crank, k6).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backlink profile for any domain — referring domains, authority, anchors, new/lost links, and a side-by-side vs a competitor. Use when asked "check my backlinks", "backlink profile of X", "who links to them", or "link gap vs competitor".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal, public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks). Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix, (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing", "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us", "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side comparison of two contract versions or two different contracts with change tracking, favorability analysis, and risk assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare childcare options — nursery/daycare, childminder, nanny, family, or a mix — for your family's real needs, budget, and values. Use when asked to compare childcare options, nursery vs nanny, how to choose childcare, or find the right childcare. Produces a needs-and-values profile, a side-by-side of the realistic options on cost/flexibility/socialization/control, the questions to ask and red flags to check on visits, a total-cost read (including subsidies), and a decision that fits your priorities — not a generic ranking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Renders Hi-C contact matrices honestly and reproducibly with matplotlib, cooltools, HiCExplorer, pyGenomeTracks, FAN-C, CoolBox, and plotgardener. Covers the raw/ICE-balanced/observed-over-expected transform choice, LogNorm vs symmetric-diverging colormaps with vmax/percentile clipping, resolution-to-feature matching (compartments 100-500kb, TADs 10-40kb, loops 5-10kb), square vs rotated-triangle track-stacking, NaN/white-stripe handling, virtual 4C, APA/saddle/on-diagonal pileups, two-condition side-by-side and log2-ratio maps, and interactive (HiGlass) vs scripted-static publication figures. Use when plotting a contact matrix, choosing a normalization or color scale, building a multi-track Hi-C figure, making a virtual 4C profile, piling up loops/boundaries, or comparing two conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data — per-model token usage (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + compaction baselines), pricing engine cost breakdowns, workflow intelligence (complexity scores, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness), session metadata (thinking_blocks, turn_count, turn_duration_ms, usage_extras), and full event timelines with all 10+ event types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing side-by-side comparison tools (plan-compare, product-compare, alternative-compare) that help users decide rather than just listing features. Axis selection, default-comparison logic, recommendation discipline. Honest about feature-list-dump (every feature in a row, no decision support), hidden-recommendation (biased comparison pretending to be neutral), and honest-comparison-with-guidance (genuine comparison plus opinionated recommendation) patterns. Triggers on comparison tool, plan compare, product compare, alternative compare, vs page, decision support tool. Also triggers when conversion through comparison stages is poor, when users are abandoning at the comparison step, or when a comparison tool is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix video/image color OBJECTIVELY with the get_image (action:"analyze_color") tool (scopes/stats such as black/white points, contrast, saturation, clipping, cast) instead of eyeballing a contact sheet. Covers the "washed out" signature, why reference color-match (mkl/ColorMatch/ColorMatchAdobe) CAN'T add contrast a flat source lacks, the levels/contrast-stretch fix (core AdjustContrast / CurveEditor), the measure→fix→re-measure loop, the side-by-side sandbox pattern, and where to place the fix in a render graph (after decode, before save). Use when a render looks washed out / flat / dull / over-saturated / color-cast, or when deciding between a color-match and a contrast/levels fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。