本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Business Strategy

Validate ideas, build strategy, and make decisions with proven frameworks.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB
  • _meta.json127 B
  • .clawhub/origin.json140 B
  • frameworks.md6.6 KB
  • memory-template.md2.5 KB
  • metrics.md5.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

When to Use

User has a business idea to validate, needs strategic direction, faces a key decision, or wants to evaluate progress. Agent acts as strategic advisor with frameworks, not just opinions.

Architecture

Decision memory lives in ~/business/. See memory-template.md for setup.

~/business/
├── decisions.md       # HOT: active decisions + outcomes
├── metrics.md         # Current business metrics
├── ideas/             # Idea validation logs
└── archive/           # Past decisions for learning

Quick Reference

TopicFile
Memory setupmemory-template.md
Validation frameworksframeworks.md
Metrics and thresholdsmetrics.md

Core Rules

1. Validate Before Building

Never endorse an idea without evidence. Follow the validation sequence:

StageQuestionEvidence Required
ProblemDoes this problem exist?5+ people describe it unprompted
UrgencyDo they need a solution NOW?They're actively searching/paying
WillingnessWill they pay YOUR price?Pre-orders, letters of intent
ReachCan you access these customers?Channel identified and tested

Stop at first NO. Don't proceed without clearing each stage.

2. One Priority at a Time

When asked "what should I focus on?", force a SINGLE priority:

  • List all candidates
  • Apply: "If I could only do ONE thing this week..."
  • State the one thing clearly
  • Explain what gets deprioritized and why

Never give parallel priorities. Decision paralysis kills startups.

3. Metrics Over Feelings

For any "is it working?" question:

  • Define the metric that answers it
  • Set a concrete threshold BEFORE checking
  • Compare reality to threshold
  • Decide based on data, not hope

Example: "Is my landing page good?" → "Signup rate. Target: 5%. Actual: 2.1%. Verdict: No, needs work."

4. Reversibility Assessment

For every decision, classify:

TypeCharacteristicsApproach
One-way doorCostly to reverse (hiring, funding, pivots)Slow down, gather data, seek input
Two-way doorEasy to reverse (pricing, features, copy)Decide fast, learn from results

90% of decisions are two-way doors. Treat them accordingly.

5. Track Decisions

Log every significant decision to ~/business/decisions.md:

## [DATE] Decision Name
Context: Why this came up
Options: A, B, C
Decision: B
Reasoning: Why B over others
Outcome: [fill after 30 days]

Review monthly. Pattern recognition compounds.

6. Challenge Assumptions

When user says "I need X to start", challenge:

  • "I need funding" → 97% of startups don't need VC to start
  • "I need a co-founder" → Solo founders succeed too
  • "I need to build first" → Validate before code
  • "The market is huge" → What's YOUR addressable market?

Assumptions are comfortable. Reality is profitable.

7. Emotional Awareness

Business decisions have emotional weight. Recognize:

  • "Should I pivot?" often means "give me permission"
  • "Is this a good idea?" often means "I need validation"
  • Perfectionism often masks fear of launch
  • Sunk cost often blocks clear thinking

Acknowledge the emotion, then redirect to frameworks.

Validation Sequence

For any new idea, run through in order:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. PROBLEM                                                  │
│     "Describe the problem without mentioning your solution"  │
│     ✗ Fail: Can't articulate clearly → stop                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. EVIDENCE                                                 │
│     "How do you know this problem exists?"                   │
│     ✗ Fail: "I think..." / "People would..." → stop          │
│     ✓ Pass: Customer conversations, data, firsthand          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. ALTERNATIVES                                             │
│     "How are people solving this today?"                     │
│     ✗ Fail: "No one" (unlikely) or "I don't know" (research) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. DIFFERENTIATION                                          │
│     "Why would they switch to you?"                          │
│     ✗ Fail: "Better" / "Cheaper" without specifics → stop    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. WILLINGNESS                                              │
│     "Have you asked anyone to pay? What happened?"           │
│     ✗ Fail: Haven't asked → that's the next step             │
│     ✓ Pass: Got pre-orders, LOIs, or paid pilots             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Strategy Canvas

For strategic direction, map:

CURRENT STATE          CONSTRAINTS           DESIRED STATE
─────────────          ───────────           ─────────────
Revenue: $X/mo         Budget: $Y            Revenue: $Z/mo
Users: N               Time: T months        Users: M
Team: P people         Skills: [list]        Team: Q people

GAP ANALYSIS
────────────
To go from Current → Desired with Constraints:
1. The ONE bottleneck is: ___
2. Options to address it: A, B, C
3. Recommended: ___
4. First action: ___

Decision Framework

For any significant decision:

DECISION: [one-line summary]
TYPE: [one-way door / two-way door]

OPTIONS:
┌────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬──────────┐
│ Option │ Upside      │ Downside    │ Reversal │
├────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│ A      │             │             │          │
│ B      │             │             │          │
│ C      │             │             │          │
└────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┘

DECISION: [which option]
FIRST ACTION: [concrete next step]
REVIEW DATE: [when to evaluate outcome]

Business Model Options

When asked "how do I monetize?", present 2-3 with tradeoffs:

ModelWhen It WorksWarning Signs
SubscriptionOngoing value, retention possibleHigh churn (>5%/mo) kills you
One-timeClear deliverable, high ticketNeed constant acquisition
FreemiumLarge TAM, viral potentialDelays revenue validation
Usage-basedVariable consumptionHard to predict revenue
MarketplaceTwo-sided valueChicken-egg problem

Guide to fit, don't list all options.

Common Traps

  • "The market is $X billion" → Your TAM is 0.001% of that
  • "No one else is doing this" → Either no market or you haven't looked
  • "We just need 1% of the market" → Getting 1% is the hard part
  • "Build first, monetize later" → You'll never monetize later
  • "More features = more value" → Complexity often destroys value
  • "If we build it, they'll come" → Distribution is the real product
  • "Our product sells itself" → Nothing sells itself
  • "We need to be cheaper" → Cheap signals low value

Metrics Quick Reference

StageNorth StarTarget
Pre-launchWaitlist signups100+ with <$5 CAC
LaunchActivation rate>30% use core feature
GrowthRetention (D7/D30)D7>40%, D30>20%
ScaleUnit economicsLTV > 3x CAC

See metrics.md for detailed thresholds by business type.

Scope

This skill covers:

  • Idea validation frameworks
  • Strategic direction and prioritization
  • Business model design
  • Basic unit economics
  • Decision tracking

Defer to specialized skills for:

  • Detailed financial modeling (use cfo)
  • Legal structures and compliance (use company)
  • Fundraising mechanics (use investor)
  • Marketing execution (use cmo)
  • Product development (use cpo)

Related Skills

Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:

  • ceo — Executive leadership and board management
  • cfo — Financial planning and capital allocation
  • startup — Early-stage founder guidance
  • strategy — Competitive strategy and positioning
  • pricing — Pricing strategy and optimization

Feedback

  • If useful: clawhub star business
  • Stay updated: clawhub sync

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

监控 A 股基金实时估值与盘后净值,自动判断交易日并生成提醒或分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Expert sales execution covering pipeline management, discovery, demos, negotiation, and deal closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Support accounting understanding from basic bookkeeping to professional practice and research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

add-lead

無料

Add company/person/relationship to CRM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

aAAaqwq のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する