本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開日本語紹介

hexagonal-architecture

業務ロジックをデータベースや外部APIから分離し、明確な境界とテストを設けながら、新規サービスの設計や既存コードの段階的な改修を支援するスキル。

原文原文の説明を見る

Design, implement, and refactor Ports & Adapters systems with clear domain boundaries, dependency inversion, and testable use-case orchestration across TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, and Go services. Use when introducing or refactoring toward Ports and Adapters, or when domain logic has become entangled with I/O.

インストール方法を見る

こんなときに便利

  • 業務ルールとDB・API呼び出しの分離
  • HTTP・CLI・ワーカーで処理を共用
  • 業務ルールを保って外部基盤を交換
  • 既存サービスを機能単位で移行したいとき

日本語での紹介

できること

業務ロジックをデータベースや外部API、フレームワークから分離する設計・実装・改修を支援します。Ports and Adaptersは、外部との接点をインターフェースとして定義し、その実装を周辺に置く構成です。業務上の処理手順を担うユースケースの入出力、依存関係の組み立て場所、機能別のファイル配置まで整理します。

こんなときに便利

業務ルールと入出力処理が混ざり、変更やテストが難しくなったサービスに向いています。同じ処理をHTTP、CLI、キュー処理から使う場合や、業務ルールを保ちながら外部サービスを交換したい場合にも役立ちます。既存システムは一つの機能から段階的に移行し、テストで振る舞いを確認する方針です。

使い方の例

  • 「この注文処理を、業務ルールとDBアクセスに分離して」
  • 「HTTPとCLIで共用できるユースケースを設計して」
  • 「既存サービスを一機能ずつ移行する手順とテストを整理して」

注意点

TypeScript、Java、Kotlin、Goでの構成例を扱います。業務ルールにフレームワークや外部基盤の依存を持ち込まず、接続部分はアダプター側に置く方針です。

この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md11.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Hexagonal Architecture

Hexagonal architecture (Ports and Adapters) keeps business logic independent from frameworks, transport, and persistence details. The core app depends on abstract ports, and adapters implement those ports at the edges.

When to Use

  • Building new features where long-term maintainability and testability matter.
  • Refactoring layered or framework-heavy code where domain logic is mixed with I/O concerns.
  • Supporting multiple interfaces for the same use case (HTTP, CLI, queue workers, cron jobs).
  • Replacing infrastructure (database, external APIs, message bus) without rewriting business rules.

Use this skill when the request involves boundaries, domain-centric design, refactoring tightly coupled services, or decoupling application logic from specific libraries.

Core Concepts

  • Domain model: Business rules and entities/value objects. No framework imports.
  • Use cases (application layer): Orchestrate domain behavior and workflow steps.
  • Inbound ports: Contracts describing what the application can do (commands/queries/use-case interfaces).
  • Outbound ports: Contracts for dependencies the application needs (repositories, gateways, event publishers, clock, UUID, etc.).
  • Adapters: Infrastructure and delivery implementations of ports (HTTP controllers, DB repositories, queue consumers, SDK wrappers).
  • Composition root: Single wiring location where concrete adapters are bound to use cases.

Outbound port interfaces usually live in the application layer (or in domain only when the abstraction is truly domain-level), while infrastructure adapters implement them.

Dependency direction is always inward:

  • Adapters -> application/domain
  • Application -> port interfaces (inbound/outbound contracts)
  • Domain -> domain-only abstractions (no framework or infrastructure dependencies)
  • Domain -> nothing external

How It Works

Step 1: Model a use case boundary

Define a single use case with a clear input and output DTO. Keep transport details (Express req, GraphQL context, job payload wrappers) outside this boundary.

Step 2: Define outbound ports first

Identify every side effect as a port:

  • persistence (UserRepositoryPort)
  • external calls (BillingGatewayPort)
  • cross-cutting (LoggerPort, ClockPort)

Ports should model capabilities, not technologies.

Step 3: Implement the use case with pure orchestration

Use case class/function receives ports via constructor/arguments. It validates application-level invariants, coordinates domain rules, and returns plain data structures.

Step 4: Build adapters at the edge

  • Inbound adapter converts protocol input to use-case input.
  • Outbound adapter maps app contracts to concrete APIs/ORM/query builders.
  • Mapping stays in adapters, not inside use cases.

Step 5: Wire everything in a composition root

Instantiate adapters, then inject them into use cases. Keep this wiring centralized to avoid hidden service-locator behavior.

Step 6: Test per boundary

  • Unit test use cases with fake ports.
  • Integration test adapters with real infra dependencies.
  • E2E test user-facing flows through inbound adapters.

Architecture Diagram

flowchart LR
  Client["Client (HTTP/CLI/Worker)"] --> InboundAdapter["Inbound Adapter"]
  InboundAdapter -->|"calls"| UseCase["UseCase (Application Layer)"]
  UseCase -->|"uses"| OutboundPort["OutboundPort (Interface)"]
  OutboundAdapter["Outbound Adapter"] -->|"implements"| OutboundPort
  OutboundAdapter --> ExternalSystem["DB/API/Queue"]
  UseCase --> DomainModel["DomainModel"]

Suggested Module Layout

Use feature-first organization with explicit boundaries:

src/
  features/
    orders/
      domain/
        Order.ts
        OrderPolicy.ts
      application/
        ports/
          inbound/
            CreateOrder.ts
          outbound/
            OrderRepositoryPort.ts
            PaymentGatewayPort.ts
        use-cases/
          CreateOrderUseCase.ts
      adapters/
        inbound/
          http/
            createOrderRoute.ts
        outbound/
          postgres/
            PostgresOrderRepository.ts
          stripe/
            StripePaymentGateway.ts
      composition/
        ordersContainer.ts

TypeScript Example

Port definitions

export interface OrderRepositoryPort {
  save(order: Order): Promise<void>;
  findById(orderId: string): Promise<Order | null>;
}

export interface PaymentGatewayPort {
  authorize(input: { orderId: string; amountCents: number }): Promise<{ authorizationId: string }>;
}

Use case

type CreateOrderInput = {
  orderId: string;
  amountCents: number;
};

type CreateOrderOutput = {
  orderId: string;
  authorizationId: string;
};

export class CreateOrderUseCase {
  constructor(
    private readonly orderRepository: OrderRepositoryPort,
    private readonly paymentGateway: PaymentGatewayPort
  ) {}

  async execute(input: CreateOrderInput): Promise<CreateOrderOutput> {
    const order = Order.create({ id: input.orderId, amountCents: input.amountCents });

    const auth = await this.paymentGateway.authorize({
      orderId: order.id,
      amountCents: order.amountCents,
    });

    // markAuthorized returns a new Order instance; it does not mutate in place.
    const authorizedOrder = order.markAuthorized(auth.authorizationId);
    await this.orderRepository.save(authorizedOrder);

    return {
      orderId: order.id,
      authorizationId: auth.authorizationId,
    };
  }
}

Outbound adapter

export class PostgresOrderRepository implements OrderRepositoryPort {
  constructor(private readonly db: SqlClient) {}

  async save(order: Order): Promise<void> {
    await this.db.query(
      "insert into orders (id, amount_cents, status, authorization_id) values ($1, $2, $3, $4)",
      [order.id, order.amountCents, order.status, order.authorizationId]
    );
  }

  async findById(orderId: string): Promise<Order | null> {
    const row = await this.db.oneOrNone("select * from orders where id = $1", [orderId]);
    return row ? Order.rehydrate(row) : null;
  }
}

Composition root

export const buildCreateOrderUseCase = (deps: { db: SqlClient; stripe: StripeClient }) => {
  const orderRepository = new PostgresOrderRepository(deps.db);
  const paymentGateway = new StripePaymentGateway(deps.stripe);

  return new CreateOrderUseCase(orderRepository, paymentGateway);
};

Multi-Language Mapping

Use the same boundary rules across ecosystems; only syntax and wiring style change.

  • TypeScript/JavaScript
    • Ports: application/ports/* as interfaces/types.
    • Use cases: classes/functions with constructor/argument injection.
    • Adapters: adapters/inbound/*, adapters/outbound/*.
    • Composition: explicit factory/container module (no hidden globals).
  • Java
    • Packages: domain, application.port.in, application.port.out, application.usecase, adapter.in, adapter.out.
    • Ports: interfaces in application.port.*.
    • Use cases: plain classes (Spring @Service is optional, not required).
    • Composition: Spring config or manual wiring class; keep wiring out of domain/use-case classes.
  • Kotlin
    • Modules/packages mirror the Java split (domain, application.port, application.usecase, adapter).
    • Ports: Kotlin interfaces.
    • Use cases: classes with constructor injection (Koin/Dagger/Spring/manual).
    • Composition: module definitions or dedicated composition functions; avoid service locator patterns.
  • Go
    • Packages: internal/<feature>/domain, application, ports, adapters/inbound, adapters/outbound.
    • Ports: small interfaces owned by the consuming application package.
    • Use cases: structs with interface fields plus explicit New... constructors.
    • Composition: wire in cmd/<app>/main.go (or dedicated wiring package), keep constructors explicit.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Domain entities importing ORM models, web framework types, or SDK clients.
  • Use cases reading directly from req, res, or queue metadata.
  • Returning database rows directly from use cases without domain/application mapping.
  • Letting adapters call each other directly instead of flowing through use-case ports.
  • Spreading dependency wiring across many files with hidden global singletons.

Migration Playbook

  1. Pick one vertical slice (single endpoint/job) with frequent change pain.
  2. Extract a use-case boundary with explicit input/output types.
  3. Introduce outbound ports around existing infrastructure calls.
  4. Move orchestration logic from controllers/services into the use case.
  5. Keep old adapters, but make them delegate to the new use case.
  6. Add tests around the new boundary (unit + adapter integration).
  7. Repeat slice-by-slice; avoid full rewrites.

Refactoring Existing Systems

  • Strangler approach: keep current endpoints, route one use case at a time through new ports/adapters.
  • No big-bang rewrites: migrate per feature slice and preserve behavior with characterization tests.
  • Facade first: wrap legacy services behind outbound ports before replacing internals.
  • Composition freeze: centralize wiring early so new dependencies do not leak into domain/use-case layers.
  • Slice selection rule: prioritize high-churn, low-blast-radius flows first.
  • Rollback path: keep a reversible toggle or route switch per migrated slice until production behavior is verified.

Testing Guidance (Same Hexagonal Boundaries)

  • Domain tests: test entities/value objects as pure business rules (no mocks, no framework setup).
  • Use-case unit tests: test orchestration with fakes/stubs for outbound ports; assert business outcomes and port interactions.
  • Outbound adapter contract tests: define shared contract suites at port level and run them against each adapter implementation.
  • Inbound adapter tests: verify protocol mapping (HTTP/CLI/queue payload to use-case input and output/error mapping back to protocol).
  • Adapter integration tests: run against real infrastructure (DB/API/queue) for serialization, schema/query behavior, retries, and timeouts.
  • End-to-end tests: cover critical user journeys through inbound adapter -> use case -> outbound adapter.
  • Refactor safety: add characterization tests before extraction; keep them until new boundary behavior is stable and equivalent.

Best Practices Checklist

  • Domain and use-case layers import only internal types and ports.
  • Every external dependency is represented by an outbound port.
  • Validation occurs at boundaries (inbound adapter + use-case invariants).
  • Use immutable transformations (return new values/entities instead of mutating shared state).
  • Errors are translated across boundaries (infra errors -> application/domain errors).
  • Composition root is explicit and easy to audit.
  • Use cases are testable with simple in-memory fakes for ports.
  • Refactoring starts from one vertical slice with behavior-preserving tests.
  • Language/framework specifics stay in adapters, never in domain rules.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

accessibility

無料日本語概要

Web・iOS・Androidの画面を、読み上げやキーボード操作に対応させ、ラベル、配色、操作対象の大きさなどをWCAG 2.2に沿って設計・点検するスキル。

  • アイコンボタンの説明を付けたいとき
  • キーボード操作とモーダルの点検
  • コントラストや操作対象の大きさの確認
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントの不調を、指示・記憶・ツール実行・画面表示など12の層から調べるスキル。コードやログを根拠に原因を整理し、重要度順の指摘と修正案をまとめます。

  • アプリ内だけで起きる不調を調べたいとき
  • 過去の会話が混ざる原因を調査
  • ツールの未実行や実行の誤報を確認
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-eval

無料日本語概要

実際の開発課題で複数のコーディングエージェントを比較するスキル。成功率、取得可能なAPI費用、所要時間、繰り返し実行の安定性を測り、選定や更新後の評価に使えます。

  • 実際の開発課題でエージェントを比較
  • 新しいツールやモデルの導入前評価
  • エージェント更新後の性能確認
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-harness-construction

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントが使うツールの種類や入出力、エラーからの復帰手順を設計・見直します。文脈の情報量も整理し、作業完了率や再試行回数で改善を評価します。

  • エージェントのツールや入力形式の設計
  • ツールの結果と次の行動を明確にしたいとき
  • 安全な再試行と停止条件を定めたいとき
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントが失敗や同じ操作を繰り返す原因を、エラーと実行状況から整理します。小さな復旧操作を試し、結果と根拠を引き継げる報告にまとめるスキルです。

  • エージェントの連続失敗を診断したいとき
  • 同じツール操作のループ調査
  • 情報の蓄積による出力劣化の点検
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月5日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントの失敗や同じ操作の繰り返しを記録し、原因の切り分け、小さな復旧操作、結果の報告まで進める手順を示して、根拠のある再試行につなげるスキル。

  • 同じツール操作を繰り返す原因の調査
  • 会話の肥大化による品質低下の調査
  • ファイルパスや環境の食い違いの確認
affaan-m/ECC27.8万2026年10月12日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する