Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes DORA delivery-performance metrics from git and GitHub API. Use when assessing deployment frequency, lead time, or change failure rate.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Compute the four DORA delivery-performance metrics (Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service) from local git history and the GitHub API. Classify each metric into Elite, High, Medium, or Low using thresholds from DORA's State of DevOps research, and surface the single weakest dimension as the next improvement target.
minister:release-health-gates.Run the helper script with the desired window:
python3 -m minister.dora_metrics --window 30 --branch main
Read the output: per-metric value, tier classification, and the bottleneck pointer.
For agentic-workflow audits, run the same window twice. Once
filtering to AI-authored PRs (e.g., --failure-label ai-bug),
once across all PRs. Compare the CFR delta. See
modules/agentic-workflow-signals.md.
Optionally pipe --json into the tracker so trend data persists
alongside release-health-gates snapshots.
Optionally render trend charts with kuva when reviewing multiple windows or comparing before/after an agentic-workflow change:
# Collect weekly snapshots into a TSV, then plot all four metrics
# week<TAB>metric<TAB>value
kuva line trends.tsv --x week --y value --color-by metric \
--title "DORA trends (30-day windows)" -o dora-trends.svg
# Quick terminal preview without writing a file
kuva line trends.tsv --x week --y value --color-by metric --terminal
kuva reads TSV/CSV from stdin or a file path. Install once:
cargo install kuva --features cli. No project source changes
required. See kuva for the
full plot-type reference.
| Flag | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
--window | 30 | Measurement window in days |
--branch | HEAD | Production branch |
--failure-label | bug | GitHub label marking prod failures |
--json | off | Emit JSON instead of human-readable |
--repo-path | cwd | Repository directory |
A short text report or JSON payload with:
4.2/day, 2.1 hours, 8%).See modules/thresholds.md for the complete table. Brief summary:
| Metric | Elite | High | Medium | Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | >= 1/day | >= 1/week | >= 1/month | < 1/month |
| LT | <= 1 day | <= 1 week | <= 1 month | > 1 month |
| CFR | <= 15% | <= 30% | <= 45% | > 45% |
| TRS | < 1 hour | < 1 day | < 1 week | >= 1 week |
Confirm a DORA report is real by re-running the script over a
narrower window and checking that DF and LT scale predictably. For
CFR and TRS, sample two or three of the contributing GitHub issues
and verify the bug (or chosen) label is correct on each.
Unit tests live in
plugins/minister/tests/unit/test_dora_metrics.py. Each tier
boundary is exercised at the threshold, so future contributors who
adjust an inequality (> vs >=) trigger a failure rather than a
silent regression. Add new tests at the threshold when extending
classification logic.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。