本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

saas-asset-audit

Audit assets against naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards. Finds orphaned assets, missing references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

連携ツールCloudflare
インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Asset Audit

Interaction Localization Rule: When locale: pt-BR (or user speaks Portuguese), ALL questions (AskUserQuestion / ask_question), confirmation prompts, and selectable options MUST be translated and presented in Brazilian Portuguese (PT-BR). Any English question text or options in this skill are illustrative examples — NEVER display English questions or options to a Portuguese developer. Internal reasoning, code synthesis, tests, and documentation files MUST remain in English.

Measuring file sizes and formats requires Bash

This skill's report asks for file sizes against budgets, texture dimensions (power-of-two), audio sample rates, and last-modified times for orphan detection. None of those are obtainable from Read/Glob/Grep — they need stat or a binary header read, so the read-only measuring commands (stat, file, od, wc, du) are pre-approved above; list files with Glob. Anything else asks first.

If you cannot take a measurement, the cell is NOT ASSESSED, never an estimate. A size budget table filled from guesses is worse than an empty one: it looks like evidence. This is a live fabrication vector even on a project full of real assets: if the template demands tables of numbers the tool allowlist cannot produce, the only way to complete it is to invent them.


Insufficient input — check this before producing any report

If the inputs this skill needs do not exist, the answer is "could not run" — not a filled-in report. Check first, and stop if the check fails.

  1. List the inputs this skill reads (data files, prior reports, profiler output, test results, registries, source code).
  2. For each, record FOUND or ABSENT — not "assumed present".
  3. If any input required for a section is ABSENT, that section is NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA. Do not estimate it, do not infer it from an adjacent artifact, and do not leave a mandated cell to be filled by whoever reads the template next.
  4. If every required input is ABSENT, stop and report NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA as the whole verdict, naming what was missing and which skill produces it.

A verdict of NOT ASSESSED is a success. It is the correct, useful answer to "what does the data say?" when there is no data. The failure mode this prevents is specific: a report whose verdict enum has no "could not run" state produces false clean passes — an asset audit returning COMPLIANT on a project with no assets and no standards, or a performance profile reporting ">99% headroom against a 16.67ms budget" with zero profiler data and no budget ever set.

Absence of evidence is never evidence of absence. A scan that finds no matches because there are no files to scan has not verified anything. Say which of the two happened — a reader cannot tell from a green result.


Phase 1: Read Standards

Read the design tokens / asset spec's Asset Standards section (design/art/saas-design-tokens.md) and any asset standards in the relevant design docs — size budgets and format rules come from there. The naming patterns are the ones in Phase 3 below, unless the design tokens spec states its own. Read the design tokens / asset spec by section: find the heading with the Basinfy Protocol (basinfy_search / basinfy_read if .basinfy/ exists) or the Basinfy Protocol (basinfy_search / basinfy_read if .basinfy/ exists) or the Grep tool (pattern ^#, content mode) and Read that range with offset and limit.

If neither states a size budget — or there is no design tokens / asset spec — the Size section is NOT ASSESSED — no size budget set, and the report names /saas-design-tokens, whose Asset Standards section sets budgets, formats and the naming convention.


Phase 2: Scan Asset Directories

Assets live under the engine's asset root: assets/ on Next.js, Assets/ on FastAPI, Content/ on Cloudflare. Resolve the engine and its code root per .claude/docs/code-root-resolution.md; that code root is the one Phase 3's orphan and missing-asset searches read. If it is unresolved, stop: NOT ASSESSED — engine unresolved, naming /saas-setup-stack.

Scan the asset root using Glob:

  • Next.js — public/**/*, src/assets/**/*
  • FastAPI — static/**/*, app/static/**/*, leaving out backend source (*.py, *.pyc) and cache files
  • Cloudflare — public/**/*.{svg,png,webp,woff2}

The files matched are Total assets scanned. If there are none, the checks on scanned files — Naming, Size, Format, Orphaned — are NOT ASSESSED — no assets under <asset root>; the missing-asset search still runs.


Phase 3: Run Compliance Checks

Naming conventions:

  • Art: [category]_[name]_[variant]_[size].[ext]
  • Audio: [category]_[context]_[name]_[variant].[ext]
  • All files must be lowercase with underscores

These are Next.js's conventions. FastAPI and Cloudflare use kebab-case or snake_case, so on those engines check names against the naming rule the design tokens / asset spec states; with none, Naming is NOT ASSESSED — no naming rule for <engine> (name /saas-design-tokens).

File standards:

  • Images & Icons: Modern web formats (SVG, WebP, PNG, AVIF), within size budget
  • Static Media: Correct dimensions, modern web formats, within bundle size limits.
  • Data: Valid JSON/YAML, schema-compliant

On web/SaaS platforms an asset file does not keep legacy binary format or dimensions, so Format is NOT ASSESSED there; its size is still measured.

Orphaned assets: Search the code root for references to each asset file. Flag any with no references.

Missing assets: Search the code root for asset references and verify the files exist.

Both searches need code: if the code root holds no source files, Orphaned and Missing are NOT ASSESSED — no code to search. On backend-only stacks where asset references live in HTML templates, emails, or markdown rather than code, an asset no code names may still be in use: Orphaned is NOT ASSESSED there.


Phase 4: Output Audit Report

# Asset Audit Report -- [Category] -- [Date]

## Summary
- **Total assets scanned**: [N]
- **Naming violations**: [N]
- **Size violations**: [N]
- **Format violations**: [N]
- **Orphaned assets**: [N]
- **Missing assets**: [N]
- **Sections not assessed**: [none | each section and why]

## Naming Violations
| File | Expected Pattern | Issue |
|------|-----------------|-------|

## Size Violations
| File | Budget | Actual | Overage |
|------|--------|--------|---------|

## Format Violations
| File | Expected Format | Actual Format |
|------|----------------|---------------|

## Orphaned Assets (no code references found)
| File | Last Modified | Size | Recommendation |
|------|-------------|------|---------------|

## Missing Assets (referenced but not found)
| Reference Location | Expected Path |
|-------------------|---------------|

## Recommendations
[Prioritized list of fixes, one per violation, each naming the change — the
target resolution or compression for a size violation, the corrected name for a
naming violation, the target format for a format violation]

## Verdict: [NOT ASSESSED / COMPLIANT / WARNINGS / NON-COMPLIANT]

Choose the verdict by the findings, first match wins:

  • NON-COMPLIANT — any size violation, or any asset that code references but that does not exist
  • WARNINGS — only naming, format or orphaned-asset findings
  • NOT ASSESSED — the audit did not cover its scope: no data at all (the path above), zero assets scanned, or any section NOT ASSESSED — name which. It ranks below the two finding verdicts, because a measured violation is more actionable than a gap, and above COMPLIANT
  • COMPLIANT — at least one asset scanned, every section assessed, no findings

This skill is read-only — it produces a report but does not write files.


Phase 5: Next Steps

  • Fix naming violations using the Phase 3 patterns (or the design tokens / asset spec's, where it states its own).
  • If standards were missing, run /saas-design-tokens to write its Asset Standards section.
  • Delete confirmed orphaned assets after manual review.
  • Run /saas-content-audit to cross-check asset counts against PRD-specified requirements.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Turn your AI session into an autonomous SaaS and software engineering studio with 49 specialized agents, 74 workflow skills (/saas-*), 28 director gates, and complete architecture across Next.js, FastAPI, Supabase, Tailwind, and Stripe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /saas-project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Create an ADR documenting a technical decision: context, alternatives considered, consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Traceability matrix mapping PRD requirements to ADRs. Finds gaps, cross-ADR conflicts, stack compatibility. PASS/CONCERNS/NOT ASSESSED/FAIL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Author per-asset visual specs, SVG dimensions, and generation prompts from PRDs and design tokens. After design tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Guides the user through finding and choosing a product concept. Use when the user wants product ideas, a new concept, a SaaS application jam idea, or to explore other directions, including dropping the current idea and starting over.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Basinfy/Basinfy-SaaS-Studio22026年10月22日 更新

Basinfy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する