AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
無料GitHub で公開
accessibility-compliance
Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.
含まれるファイル（1）
- SKILL.md2.3 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Accessibility Compliance
Master accessibility implementation to create inclusive experiences that work for everyone, including users with disabilities.
When to Use This Skill
- Implementing WCAG 2.2 Level AA or AAA compliance
- Building screen reader accessible interfaces
- Adding keyboard navigation to interactive components
- Implementing focus management and focus trapping
- Creating accessible forms with proper labeling
- Supporting reduced motion and high contrast preferences
- Building mobile accessibility features (iOS VoiceOver, Android TalkBack)
- Conducting accessibility audits and fixing violations
Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Best Practices
- Use Semantic HTML: Prefer native elements over ARIA when possible
- Test with Real Users: Include people with disabilities in user testing
- Keyboard First: Design interactions to work without a mouse
- Don't Disable Focus Styles: Style them, don't remove them
- Provide Text Alternatives: All non-text content needs descriptions
- Support Zoom: Content should work at 200% zoom
- Announce Changes: Use live regions for dynamic content
- Respect Preferences: Honor prefers-reduced-motion and prefers-contrast
Common Issues
- Missing alt text: Images without descriptions
- Poor color contrast: Text hard to read against background
- Keyboard traps: Focus stuck in component
- Missing labels: Form inputs without associated labels
- Auto-playing media: Content that plays without user initiation
- Inaccessible custom controls: Recreating native functionality poorly
- Missing skip links: No way to bypass repetitive content
- Focus order issues: Tab order doesn't match visual order
Testing Tools
- Automated: axe DevTools, WAVE, Lighthouse
- Manual: VoiceOver (macOS/iOS), NVDA/JAWS (Windows), TalkBack (Android)
- Simulators: NoCoffee (vision), Silktide (various disabilities)
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新