AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Adaptyv Bio is a cloud lab that turns protein sequences into experimental data. Users submit amino acid sequences via API or UI; Adaptyv's automated lab runs assays (binding, thermostability, expression, fluorescence) and delivers results in ~21 days.
Official docs: docs.adaptyvbio.com/api-reference · llms.txt index · OpenAPI spec
Base URL: https://foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com/api/v1
Authentication: Bearer token in the Authorization header. Tokens are obtained from foundry.adaptyvbio.com sidebar.
When writing code, always read the API key from the environment variable ADAPTYV_API_KEY or from a .env file — never hardcode tokens. Check for a .env file in the project root first; if one exists, use a library like python-dotenv to load it.
The official API docs use FOUNDRY_API_TOKEN in curl examples; that is the same bearer token — prefer ADAPTYV_API_KEY in Python and new shell scripts for consistency with the SDK.
export ADAPTYV_API_KEY="abs0_..."
curl https://foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com/api/v1/targets?limit=3 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ADAPTYV_API_KEY"
Every request except GET /openapi.json requires authentication. Store tokens in environment variables or .env files — never commit them to source control.
Version note: adaptyv-sdk 0.1.0 (beta) is not yet on PyPI — install from GitHub:
uv pip install "git+https://github.com/adaptyvbio/adaptyv-sdk.git"
In a project with pyproject.toml:
uv add "adaptyv-sdk @ git+https://github.com/adaptyvbio/adaptyv-sdk.git"
Environment variables (set in shell or .env file):
ADAPTYV_API_KEY=your_api_key
ADAPTYV_API_URL=https://foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com/api/v1
ADAPTYV_ORGANIZATION_ID=your_org_id # optional
The @lab.experiment decorator and FoundryClient both read ADAPTYV_API_KEY and ADAPTYV_API_URL from the environment when not passed explicitly.
from adaptyv import lab
@lab.experiment(target="PD-L1", experiment_type="screening", method="bli")
def design_binders():
return {"design_a": "MVKVGVNG...", "design_b": "MKVLVAG..."}
result = design_binders()
print(f"Experiment: {result.experiment_url}")
import os
from adaptyv import FoundryClient
client = FoundryClient(
api_key=os.environ["ADAPTYV_API_KEY"],
base_url=os.environ.get(
"ADAPTYV_API_URL",
"https://foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com/api/v1",
),
)
# Browse targets
targets = client.targets.list(search="EGFR", selfservice_only=True)
# Estimate cost
estimate = client.experiments.cost_estimate({
"experiment_spec": {
"experiment_type": "screening",
"method": "bli",
"target_id": "target-uuid",
"sequences": {"seq1": "EVQLVESGGGLVQ..."},
"n_replicates": 3
}
})
# Create and submit
exp = client.experiments.create({...})
client.experiments.submit(exp.experiment_id)
# Later: retrieve results
results = client.experiments.get_results(exp.experiment_id)
| Type | Method | Measures | Requires Target |
|---|---|---|---|
affinity | bli or spr | KD, kon, koff kinetics | Yes |
screening | bli or spr | Yes/no binding | Yes |
thermostability | — | Melting temperature (Tm) | No |
expression | — | Expression yield | No |
fluorescence | — | Fluorescence intensity | No |
Draft → WaitingForConfirmation → QuoteSent → WaitingForMaterials → InQueue → InProduction → DataAnalysis → InReview → Done
| Status | Who Acts | Description |
|---|---|---|
Draft | You | Editable, no cost commitment |
WaitingForConfirmation | Adaptyv | Under review, quote being prepared |
QuoteSent | You | Review and confirm the quote |
WaitingForMaterials | Adaptyv | Gene fragments and target ordered |
InQueue | Adaptyv | Materials arrived, queued for lab |
InProduction | Adaptyv | Assay running |
DataAnalysis | Adaptyv | Raw data processing and QC |
InReview | Adaptyv | Final validation |
Done | You | Results available |
Canceled | Either | Experiment canceled |
The results_status field on an experiment tracks: none, partial, or all.
# 1. Find a target
targets = client.targets.list(search="EGFR", selfservice_only=True)
target_id = targets.items[0].id
# 2. Preview cost
estimate = client.experiments.cost_estimate({
"experiment_spec": {
"experiment_type": "screening",
"method": "bli",
"target_id": target_id,
"sequences": {"seq1": "EVQLVESGGGLVQ...", "seq2": "MKVLVAG..."},
"n_replicates": 3
}
})
# 3. Create experiment (starts as Draft)
exp = client.experiments.create({
"name": "EGFR binder screen batch 1",
"experiment_spec": {
"experiment_type": "screening",
"method": "bli",
"target_id": target_id,
"sequences": {"seq1": "EVQLVESGGGLVQ...", "seq2": "MKVLVAG..."},
"n_replicates": 3
}
})
# 4. Submit for review
client.experiments.submit(exp.experiment_id)
# 5. Poll or use webhooks until Done
# 6. Retrieve results
results = client.experiments.get_results(exp.experiment_id)
exp = client.experiments.create({
"name": "Auto pipeline run",
"experiment_spec": {...},
"skip_draft": True,
"auto_accept_quote": True,
"webhook_url": "https://my-server.com/webhook"
})
# Webhook fires on each status transition; poll or wait for Done
Pass webhook_url when creating an experiment. Adaptyv POSTs to that URL on every status transition with the experiment ID, previous status, and new status.
{"seq1": "EVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS"}{"seq1": {"aa_string": "EVQLVESGGGLVQ...", "control": false, "metadata": {"type": "scfv"}}}"MVLS:EVQL"Draft statusAll list endpoints support pagination (limit 1-100, default 50; offset), search (free-text on name fields), and sorting.
Filtering uses s-expression syntax via the filter query parameter:
eq(field,value), neq, gt, gte, lt, lte, contains(field,substring)between(field,lo,hi), in(field,v1,v2,...)and(expr1,expr2,...), or(...), not(expr)is_null(field), is_not_null(field)at(field,key) — e.g., eq(at(metadata,score),42)float(), int(), text(), timestamp(), date()Sorting uses asc(field) or desc(field), comma-separated (max 8):
sort=desc(created_at),asc(name)
Example: filter=and(gte(created_at,2026-01-01),eq(status,done))
All errors return:
{
"error": "Human-readable description",
"request_id": "req_019462a4-b1c2-7def-8901-23456789abcd"
}
The request_id is also in the x-request-id response header — include it when contacting support.
Tokens use Biscuit-based cryptographic attenuation. You can create restricted tokens scoped by organization, resource type, actions (read/create/update), and expiry via POST /tokens/attenuate. Revoking a token (POST /tokens/revoke) revokes it and all its descendants.
For the full list of all 32 endpoints with request/response schemas, read references/api-endpoints.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。