AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI驱动的综合健康分析系统,整合多维度健康数据、识别异常模式、预测健康风险、提供个性化建议。支持智能问答和AI健康报告生成。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
基于AI技术的综合健康分析系统,提供智能健康洞察、风险预测和个性化建议。
当用户提到以下场景时,使用此技能:
通用询问:
风险预测:
智能问答:
报告生成:
const aiConfig = readFile('data/ai-config.json');
const aiHistory = readFile('data/ai-history.json');
检查AI功能是否启用,验证数据源配置。
const profile = readFile('data/profile.json');
获取基础信息:年龄、性别、身高、体重、BMI等。
根据配置的数据源读取相关数据:
// 基础健康指标
const indexData = readFile('data/index.json');
// 生活方式数据
const fitnessData = readFile('data-example/fitness-tracker.json');
const sleepData = readFile('data-example/sleep-tracker.json');
const nutritionData = readFile('data-example/nutrition-tracker.json');
// 心理健康数据
const mentalHealthData = readFile('data-example/mental-health-tracker.json');
// 医疗历史
const medications = exists('data/medications.json') ? readFile('data/medications.json') : null;
const allergies = exists('data/allergies.json') ? readFile('data/allergies.json') : null;
整合所有数据源,进行数据清洗、时间对齐和缺失值处理。
相关性分析: 计算睡眠↔情绪、运动↔体重、营养↔生化指标等关联
趋势分析: 使用线性回归、移动平均等方法识别趋势方向
异常检测: 使用CUSUM、Z-score算法检测异常值和变化点
基于Framingham、ADA、ACC/AHA等标准进行风险预测:
根据分析结果生成三级建议:
文本报告: 包含总体评估、风险预测、关键趋势、相关性发现、个性化建议
HTML报告: 调用 scripts/generate_ai_report.py 生成包含ECharts图表的交互式报告
记录分析结果到 data/ai-history.json
| 数据源 | 文件路径 | 数据内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 用户档案 | data/profile.json | 年龄、性别、身高、体重、BMI |
| 医疗记录 | data/index.json | 生化指标、影像检查 |
| 运动追踪 | data-example/fitness-tracker.json | 运动类型、时长、强度、MET值 |
| 睡眠追踪 | data-example/sleep-tracker.json | 睡眠时长、质量、PSQI评分 |
| 营养追踪 | data-example/nutrition-tracker.json | 饮食记录、营养素摄入、RDA达成率 |
| 心理健康 | data-example/mental-health-tracker.json | PHQ-9、GAD-7评分 |
| 用药记录 | data/medications.json | 药物名称、剂量、用法、依从性 |
| 过敏史 | data/allergies.json | 过敏原、严重程度 |
/ai analyze - AI综合分析/ai predict [risk_type] - 健康风险预测/ai chat [query] - 自然语言问答/ai report generate [type] - 生成AI健康报告/ai status - 查看AI功能状态此Skill仅使用以下工具:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。