AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
無料GitHub で公開
anti-reversing-techniques
Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use this skill when analyzing malware evasion techniques, when implementing anti-debugging protections for CTF challenges, when reverse engineering packed binaries, or when building security research tools that need to detect virtualized environments.
含まれるファイル（1）
- SKILL.md3.8 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: This skill contains dual-use security techniques. Before proceeding with any bypass or analysis:
- Verify authorization: Confirm you have explicit written permission from the software owner, or are operating within a legitimate security context (CTF, authorized pentest, malware analysis, security research)
- Document scope: Ensure your activities fall within the defined scope of your authorization
- Legal compliance: Understand that unauthorized bypassing of software protection may violate laws (CFAA, DMCA anti-circumvention, etc.)
Legitimate use cases: Malware analysis, authorized penetration testing, CTF competitions, academic security research, analyzing software you own/have rights to
Anti-Reversing Techniques
Understanding protection mechanisms encountered during authorized software analysis, security research, and malware analysis. This knowledge helps analysts bypass protections to complete legitimate analysis tasks.
For advanced techniques, see references/advanced-techniques.md
Input / Output
What you provide:
- Binary path or sample: the executable, DLL, or firmware image under analysis
- Platform: Windows x86/x64, Linux, macOS, ARM — affects which checks apply
- Goal: bypass for dynamic analysis, identify protection type, build detection code, implement for CTF
What this skill produces:
- Protection identification: named technique (e.g., RDTSC timing check, PEB BeingDebugged) with location in binary
- Bypass strategy: specific patch addresses, hook points, or tool commands to neutralize each check
- Analysis report: structured findings listing each protection layer, severity, and recommended bypass
- Code artifacts: Python/IDAPython scripts, GDB command sequences, or C stubs for bypassing or implementing checks
Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Troubleshooting
Detection technique works on x86 but not ARM
RDTSC and CPUID are x86-only. On ARM, use MRS x0, PMCCNTR_EL0 (requires kernel PMU access) or clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC). PEB/TEB do not exist on ARM — replace with /proc/self/status (Linux) or task_info (macOS). Rebuild detection logic with platform-specific APIs.
False positive on legitimate debugger or analysis tool
Timing checks fire when Process Monitor or AV hooks inflate syscall latency. Calibrate the threshold at startup: measure the guarded path 3 times and use mean + 3*stddev. For ptrace checks, verify the TracerPid comm name via /proc/<pid>/comm before exiting — it may be an unrelated monitoring tool, not a debugger.
Bypass patch causes crash instead of continuing execution
Before NOPing a conditional jump, trace the "detected" branch fully. If it initializes or frees heap state needed later, patching the jump skips that setup and corrupts state. Instead, patch the comparison operand to the expected "clean" value, or use x64dbg's "Set condition to always false" on the breakpoint rather than modifying bytes.
Related Skills
binary-analysis-patterns— static and dynamic analysis workflows for ELF/PE/Mach-Omemory-forensics— process memory acquisition, artifact extraction, and live analysisprotocol-reverse-engineering— decoding custom binary protocols and encrypted network traffic
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新