本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

autodock-vina-docking

Molecular docking with AutoDock Vina (Python API). Receptor/ligand prep (Meeko + RDKit), grid box, docking, pose and binding energy analysis, and batch virtual screening.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md15.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AutoDock Vina Molecular Docking

Overview

AutoDock Vina is one of the fastest and most widely used open-source molecular docking engines for predicting protein–ligand binding modes and affinities. This skill covers the full Python-based pipeline: receptor preparation from PDB, ligand preparation from SMILES/SDF via Meeko and RDKit, search box definition, docking execution, pose analysis, and batch virtual screening for hit identification.

When to Use

  • Predicting binding poses of small molecules to a protein target
  • Estimating relative binding affinities (kcal/mol) for ligand ranking
  • Virtual screening of compound libraries against a target receptor
  • Validating docking protocols by re-docking co-crystallized ligands
  • Preparing docking inputs from SMILES strings without intermediate files
  • Comparing binding modes of analogs in a structure-activity relationship study
  • Generating starting poses for molecular dynamics simulations
  • Use DiffDock instead for blind docking when the binding site is unknown; use GNINA as an alternative with CNN scoring

Prerequisites

  • Python packages: vina, meeko, rdkit, prody (for PDB fetch), py3Dmol (for visualization)
  • External tools: ADFR Suite (provides prepare_receptor for PDBQT conversion) — download from https://ccsb.scripps.edu/adfr/downloads/
  • Data requirements: Protein structure (PDB file or PDB ID), ligand(s) as SMILES, SDF, or MOL2
  • Environment: Python 3.8+, Linux or macOS recommended
pip install vina meeko rdkit-pypi prody py3Dmol
# ADFR Suite must be installed separately for prepare_receptor

Workflow

Step 1: Fetch and Prepare the Receptor

Download the protein structure, remove water/heteroatoms, and convert to PDBQT format.

import prody
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

# Download PDB structure (example: HIV-1 protease, PDB 1HPV)
pdb_id = "1HPV"
pdb_file = f"{pdb_id}.pdb"
prody.fetchPDB(pdb_id, compressed=False)

# Extract protein chain only (remove water and ligands)
structure = prody.parsePDB(pdb_file)
protein = structure.select("protein")
prody.writePDB(f"{pdb_id}_protein.pdb", protein)
print(f"Protein atoms: {protein.numAtoms()}")

# Convert to PDBQT using ADFR Suite's prepare_receptor
receptor_pdbqt = f"{pdb_id}_receptor.pdbqt"
subprocess.run([
    "prepare_receptor",
    "-r", f"{pdb_id}_protein.pdb",
    "-o", receptor_pdbqt,
    "-A", "hydrogens",  # add hydrogens
], check=True)
print(f"Receptor PDBQT: {receptor_pdbqt}")

Step 2: Identify the Binding Site

Define the docking search box centered on the known binding site or co-crystallized ligand.

import numpy as np

# Option A: Center on co-crystallized ligand coordinates
structure = prody.parsePDB(pdb_file)
ligand = structure.select("hetero and not water and not ion")
if ligand is not None:
    center = ligand.getCoords().mean(axis=0)
    # Box size = ligand extent + padding
    extent = ligand.getCoords().max(axis=0) - ligand.getCoords().min(axis=0)
    box_size = extent + 10.0  # 10 Å padding on each side
    print(f"Binding site center: {center}")
    print(f"Box size: {box_size}")
else:
    # Option B: Manual coordinates (from literature or visual inspection)
    center = np.array([15.0, 54.0, 17.0])
    box_size = np.array([25.0, 25.0, 25.0])
    print(f"Using manual box: center={center}, size={box_size}")

Step 3: Prepare the Ligand from SMILES

Use RDKit for 3D coordinate generation and Meeko for PDBQT conversion.

from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem
from meeko import MoleculePreparation, PDBQTWriterLegacy

# Define ligand (example: Indinavir, HIV protease inhibitor)
smiles = "CC(C)(C)NC(=O)[C@@H]1CN(CCc2ccccc2)C[C@H]1O"
mol_name = "indinavir_analog"

# Generate 3D coordinates with RDKit
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smiles)
mol = Chem.AddHs(mol)
AllChem.EmbedMolecule(mol, randomSeed=42)
AllChem.MMFFOptimizeMolecule(mol)

# Convert to PDBQT using Meeko
preparator = MoleculePreparation()
mol_setups = preparator.prepare(mol)

# Write PDBQT string (for Vina API) or file
pdbqt_string = PDBQTWriterLegacy.write_string(mol_setups[0])[0]
ligand_pdbqt = f"{mol_name}.pdbqt"
with open(ligand_pdbqt, "w") as f:
    f.write(pdbqt_string)
print(f"Ligand PDBQT: {ligand_pdbqt} ({mol.GetNumAtoms()} atoms)")

Step 4: Run Docking

Initialize AutoDock Vina, configure the search space, and execute docking.

from vina import Vina

# Initialize Vina
v = Vina(sf_name="vina", cpu=4)

# Load receptor and ligand
v.set_receptor(receptor_pdbqt)
v.set_ligand_from_file(ligand_pdbqt)

# Define search space
v.compute_vina_maps(
    center=center.tolist(),
    box_size=box_size.tolist(),
)

# Run docking
v.dock(
    exhaustiveness=32,   # Higher = more thorough (default 8)
    n_poses=10,          # Number of output poses
)

# Write output poses
output_file = f"{mol_name}_docked.pdbqt"
v.write_poses(output_file, n_poses=10, overwrite=True)
print(f"Docking complete. Poses written to {output_file}")

Step 5: Analyze Docking Results

Extract binding energies and RMSD values from the docked poses using Vina's built-in API.

# Method A: Vina built-in energies (most reliable)
energies = v.energies(n_poses=10)
# Each row: [total, inter, intra, torsions, intra_best_pose]
print(f"{'Pose':<6} {'Total (kcal/mol)':<18} {'Inter':<10} {'Intra':<10}")
print("-" * 44)
for i, e in enumerate(energies):
    print(f"{i+1:<6} {e[0]:<18.2f} {e[1]:<10.2f} {e[2]:<10.2f}")

print(f"\nBest pose: {energies[0][0]:.2f} kcal/mol")

# Method B: Parse PDBQT output with Meeko (for RDKit conversion)
from meeko import PDBQTMolecule, RDKitMolCreate
pdbqt_mol = PDBQTMolecule.from_file(output_file)
best_pose_rdkit = RDKitMolCreate.from_pdbqt_mol(pdbqt_mol)[0]
print(f"Best pose converted to RDKit mol: {best_pose_rdkit.GetNumAtoms()} atoms")

Step 6: Visualize Docking Results

Generate a 3D visualization of the docked complex using py3Dmol.

import py3Dmol

# Load receptor and best docked pose
with open(f"{pdb_id}_protein.pdb") as f:
    receptor_pdb = f.read()
with open(output_file) as f:
    docked_pdbqt = f.read()

# Create 3D viewer
view = py3Dmol.view(width=800, height=600)
view.addModel(receptor_pdb, "pdb")
view.setStyle({"model": 0}, {"cartoon": {"color": "lightgrey"}})

# Add docked ligand (first model only)
first_model = docked_pdbqt.split("ENDMDL")[0] + "ENDMDL"
view.addModel(first_model, "pdb")
view.setStyle({"model": 1}, {"stick": {"colorscheme": "greenCarbon"}})

# Zoom to ligand
view.zoomTo({"model": 1})
view.show()
# In Jupyter: displays interactive 3D view
# To save: view.png() or view.write_html("docking_result.html")
print("3D visualization rendered")

Step 7: Batch Virtual Screening

Screen a library of compounds against the same receptor.

import pandas as pd

# Define compound library
compounds = pd.DataFrame({
    "name": ["cpd_001", "cpd_002", "cpd_003", "cpd_004", "cpd_005"],
    "smiles": [
        "CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O",          # Aspirin
        "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O",      # Ibuprofen
        "OC(=O)c1ccccc1O",                  # Salicylic acid
        "CC12CCC3C(CCC4CC(=O)CCC34C)C1CCC2O",  # Testosterone
        "c1ccc2c(c1)cc1ccc3cccc4ccc2c1c34",     # Pyrene
    ],
})

# Screen all compounds
results = []
for _, row in compounds.iterrows():
    try:
        # Prepare ligand
        mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(row["smiles"])
        mol = Chem.AddHs(mol)
        AllChem.EmbedMolecule(mol, randomSeed=42)
        AllChem.MMFFOptimizeMolecule(mol)

        mol_setups = preparator.prepare(mol)
        pdbqt_str = PDBQTWriterLegacy.write_string(mol_setups[0])[0]

        # Dock
        v_screen = Vina(sf_name="vina", cpu=2)
        v_screen.set_receptor(receptor_pdbqt)
        v_screen.set_ligand_from_string(pdbqt_str)
        v_screen.compute_vina_maps(center=center.tolist(), box_size=box_size.tolist())
        v_screen.dock(exhaustiveness=16, n_poses=1)

        energy = v_screen.energies(n_poses=1)[0][0]
        results.append({"name": row["name"], "smiles": row["smiles"], "energy_kcal": energy})
        print(f"  {row['name']}: {energy:.2f} kcal/mol")

    except Exception as e:
        results.append({"name": row["name"], "smiles": row["smiles"], "energy_kcal": None})
        print(f"  {row['name']}: FAILED ({e})")

# Rank by binding energy
results_df = pd.DataFrame(results).sort_values("energy_kcal")
results_df.to_csv("screening_results.csv", index=False)
print(f"\nTop hits:\n{results_df.head()}")

Step 8: Save and Export

import os
os.makedirs("results", exist_ok=True)

# Save summary
results_df.to_csv("results/screening_results.csv", index=False)

# Save best poses for top hits
for _, row in results_df.head(3).iterrows():
    print(f"Top hit: {row['name']} → {row['energy_kcal']:.2f} kcal/mol")

print("Virtual screening complete. Results in results/screening_results.csv")

Key Parameters

ParameterDefaultRange / OptionsEffect
exhaustiveness88-128Search thoroughness; 32+ recommended for publication
n_poses91-20Number of output binding poses
energy_range3.01.0-5.0Max energy difference (kcal/mol) from best pose to include
sf_name"vina""vina", "ad4", "vinardo"Scoring function choice
cpuall1-NNumber of CPU cores for docking
box_size (xyz)—15-30 Å per sideSearch space dimensions; must enclose binding site + 5-10Å padding
center (xyz)—Binding site coordinatesCenter of the search box
randomSeed (RDKit)randomany intReproducible 3D conformer generation
padding (box)10.0 Å5.0-15.0 ÅExtra space around known ligand for box definition

Common Recipes

Recipe: Re-docking Validation (Cognate Docking)

When to use: validating your protocol by re-docking the co-crystallized ligand and checking RMSD < 2.0 Å.

from rdkit.Chem import AllChem, rdMolAlign

# Extract co-crystallized ligand from PDB
ref_ligand = Chem.MolFromPDBFile(f"{pdb_id}_ligand.pdb", removeHs=False)

# Dock the same ligand
# ... (use steps 3-4 above with the extracted ligand)

# Calculate RMSD between docked pose and crystal structure
rmsd = AllChem.GetBestRMS(ref_ligand, best_pose_rdkit)
print(f"Re-docking RMSD: {rmsd:.2f} Å")
print(f"Validation: {'PASS' if rmsd < 2.0 else 'FAIL'} (threshold: 2.0 Å)")

Recipe: Flexible Receptor Docking

When to use: key binding-site residues need conformational freedom (e.g., induced fit).

# Prepare receptor with flexible sidechains (using ADFR Suite)
# prepare_receptor -r protein.pdb -o rigid.pdbqt -A hydrogens
# prepare_flexreceptor -r rigid.pdbqt -s "A:ARG8,A:ASP25,A:ILE50"

v_flex = Vina(sf_name="vina", cpu=4)
v_flex.set_receptor("rigid.pdbqt", "flex.pdbqt")  # rigid + flexible parts
v_flex.set_ligand_from_file(ligand_pdbqt)
v_flex.compute_vina_maps(center=center.tolist(), box_size=box_size.tolist())
v_flex.dock(exhaustiveness=64, n_poses=10)
v_flex.write_poses("docked_flex.pdbqt", n_poses=5, overwrite=True)

Recipe: Scoring Only (No Docking)

When to use: evaluating the binding energy of a pre-positioned ligand without running a full search.

v_score = Vina(sf_name="vina")
v_score.set_receptor(receptor_pdbqt)
v_score.set_ligand_from_file("pre_positioned_ligand.pdbqt")
v_score.compute_vina_maps(center=center.tolist(), box_size=box_size.tolist())

# Score current pose
energy = v_score.score()
print(f"Score: {energy[0]:.2f} kcal/mol")

# Local minimization
energy_min = v_score.optimize()
print(f"After local optimization: {energy_min[0]:.2f} kcal/mol")
v_score.write_pose("minimized.pdbqt", overwrite=True)

Recipe: Multiple Scoring Functions Comparison

When to use: consensus scoring to increase confidence in docking results.

scoring_results = {}
for sf in ["vina", "vinardo", "ad4"]:
    v_sf = Vina(sf_name=sf, cpu=2)
    v_sf.set_receptor(receptor_pdbqt)
    v_sf.set_ligand_from_file(ligand_pdbqt)
    v_sf.compute_vina_maps(center=center.tolist(), box_size=box_size.tolist())
    v_sf.dock(exhaustiveness=16, n_poses=1)
    scoring_results[sf] = v_sf.energies(n_poses=1)[0][0]

for sf, energy in scoring_results.items():
    print(f"  {sf}: {energy:.2f} kcal/mol")

Expected Outputs

  • {name}_docked.pdbqt — Docked poses in PDBQT format with binding energies in header
  • results/screening_results.csv — Virtual screening results: compound name, SMILES, binding energy (kcal/mol)
  • {pdb_id}_receptor.pdbqt — Prepared receptor in PDBQT format
  • Figures: 3D docking visualization (interactive py3Dmol or static image)
  • Console output: ranked binding energies and RMSD values per pose

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
prepare_receptor not foundADFR Suite not in PATHAdd ADFR Suite bin to $PATH or use full path
RuntimeError: receptor not setForgot to call set_receptorCall v.set_receptor(pdbqt_file) before docking
Very positive docking scores (>0)Ligand outside box or bad geometryCheck box center/size covers binding site; verify 3D coords
All poses identicalexhaustiveness too lowIncrease to 32-64 for reliable sampling
Meeko MoleculePreparation errorMissing hydrogens on input molAlways call Chem.AddHs(mol) before Meeko
RMSD > 2Å in re-dockingBox too small or wrong centerExpand box by 5Å; verify center on co-crystallized ligand
EmbedMolecule returns -1RDKit failed to generate 3D coordsUse AllChem.EmbedMolecule(mol, maxAttempts=1000) or try useRandomCoords=True
Slow screening (>1min/compound)High exhaustiveness + large boxReduce exhaustiveness to 8-16 for screening; narrow box
PDBQTWriterLegacy not foundOld Meeko versionpip install meeko>=0.5 — API changed from write_pdbqt_string
Inconsistent energies across runsNon-deterministic searchSet seed parameter in v.dock(seed=42) for reproducibility

Bundled Resources

This skill includes reference files for deeper lookup. Read these on demand.

references/receptor_preparation_guide.md

Detailed guide for receptor preparation: handling missing residues, protonation states (pH-dependent), metal ions, cofactors, and multi-chain complexes. Decision tree for when to use PDB2PQR, PROPKA, or manual protonation.

references/scoring_functions_comparison.md

Comparison of Vina, Vinardo, and AD4 scoring functions: accuracy benchmarks, speed trade-offs, and recommendations by target class (kinase, protease, GPCR, nuclear receptor).

References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する