AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run evaluations for Hugging Face Hub models using inspect-ai and lighteval on local hardware. Use for backend selection, local GPU evals, and choosing between vLLM / Transformers / accelerate. Not for HF Jobs orchestration, model-card PRs, .eval_results publication, or community-evals automation.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This skill is for running evaluations against models on the Hugging Face Hub on local hardware.
It covers:
inspect-ai with local inferencelighteval with local inferencevllm, Hugging Face Transformers, and accelerateIt does not cover:
model-index edits.eval_results generation or publishingIf the user wants to run the same eval remotely on Hugging Face Jobs, hand off to the hugging-face-jobs skill and pass it one of the local scripts in this skill.
If the user wants to publish results into the community evals workflow, stop after generating the evaluation run and hand off that publishing step to ~/code/community-evals.
All paths below are relative to the directory containing this
SKILL.md.
| Use case | Script |
|---|---|
Local inspect-ai eval on a Hub model via inference providers | scripts/inspect_eval_uv.py |
Local GPU eval with inspect-ai using vllm or Transformers | scripts/inspect_vllm_uv.py |
Local GPU eval with lighteval using vllm or accelerate | scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py |
| Extra command patterns | examples/USAGE_EXAMPLES.md |
uv run for local execution.HF_TOKEN for gated/private models.uv --version
printenv HF_TOKEN >/dev/null
nvidia-smi
If nvidia-smi is unavailable, either:
scripts/inspect_eval_uv.py for lighter provider-backed evaluation, orhugging-face-jobs skill if the user wants remote compute.inspect-ai when you want explicit task control and inspect-native flows.lighteval when the benchmark is naturally expressed as a lighteval task string, especially leaderboard-style tasks.vllm for throughput on supported architectures.--backend hf) or accelerate as compatibility fallbacks.inspect-ai: add --limit 10 or similar.lighteval: add --max-samples 10.hugging-face-jobs with the same script + args.Best when the model is already supported by Hugging Face Inference Providers and you want the lowest local setup overhead.
uv run scripts/inspect_eval_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--task mmlu \
--limit 20
Use this path when:
inspect-evalsBest when you need to load the Hub model directly, use vllm, or fall back to Transformers for unsupported architectures.
Local GPU:
uv run scripts/inspect_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--task gsm8k \
--limit 20
Transformers fallback:
uv run scripts/inspect_vllm_uv.py \
--model microsoft/phi-2 \
--task mmlu \
--backend hf \
--trust-remote-code \
--limit 20
Best when the task is naturally expressed as a lighteval task string, especially Open LLM Leaderboard style benchmarks.
Local GPU:
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5,leaderboard|gsm8k|5" \
--max-samples 20 \
--use-chat-template
accelerate fallback:
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model microsoft/phi-2 \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5" \
--backend accelerate \
--trust-remote-code \
--max-samples 20
This skill intentionally stops at local execution and backend selection.
If the user wants to:
then switch to the hugging-face-jobs skill and pass it one of these scripts plus the chosen arguments.
inspect-ai examples:
mmlugsm8khellaswagarc_challengetruthfulqawinograndehumanevallighteval task strings use suite|task|num_fewshot:
leaderboard|mmlu|5leaderboard|gsm8k|5leaderboard|arc_challenge|25lighteval|hellaswag|0Multiple lighteval tasks can be comma-separated in --tasks.
inspect_vllm_uv.py --backend vllm for fast GPU inference on supported architectures.inspect_vllm_uv.py --backend hf when vllm does not support the model.lighteval_vllm_uv.py --backend vllm for throughput on supported models.lighteval_vllm_uv.py --backend accelerate as the compatibility fallback.inspect_eval_uv.py when Inference Providers already cover the model and you do not need direct GPU control.| Model size | Suggested local hardware |
|---|---|
< 3B | consumer GPU / Apple Silicon / small dev GPU |
3B - 13B | stronger local GPU |
13B+ | high-memory local GPU or hand off to hugging-face-jobs |
For smoke tests, prefer cheaper local runs plus --limit or --max-samples.
--batch-size--gpu-memory-utilizationhugging-face-jobsvllm:
--backend hf for inspect-ai--backend accelerate for lightevalHF_TOKEN--trust-remote-codeSee:
examples/USAGE_EXAMPLES.md for local command patternsscripts/inspect_eval_uv.pyscripts/inspect_vllm_uv.pyscripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.pyThis skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
$CODEX_HOME/skills/huggingface-community-evals and restart Codex after major changes.Preferred MCP Server: None required
huggingface-community-evals outside its documented task boundary.Before claiming the huggingface-community-evals workflow succeeded:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。