AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track and visualize ML training experiments with Trackio. Use when logging metrics during training (Python API), firing alerts for training diagnostics, or retrieving/analyzing logged metrics (CLI). Supports real-time dashboard visualization, alerts with webhooks, HF Space syncing, and JSON output for automation.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Trackio is an experiment tracking library for logging and visualizing ML training metrics. It syncs to Hugging Face Spaces for real-time monitoring dashboards.
| Task | Interface | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Logging metrics during training | Python API | references/logging_metrics.md |
| Firing alerts for training diagnostics | Python API | references/alerts.md |
| Retrieving metrics & alerts after/during training | CLI | references/retrieving_metrics.md |
Use import trackio in your training scripts to log metrics:
trackio.init()trackio.log() or use TRL's report_to="trackio"trackio.finish()Key concept: For remote/cloud training, pass space_id — metrics sync to a Space dashboard so they persist after the instance terminates. Auto-created Spaces are public by default — pass private=True if the metrics should not be public.
→ See references/logging_metrics.md for setup, TRL integration, and configuration options.
Insert trackio.alert() calls in training code to flag important events — like inserting print statements for debugging, but structured and queryable:
trackio.alert(title="...", level=trackio.AlertLevel.WARN) — fire an alertINFO, WARN, ERRORKey concept for LLM agents: Alerts are the primary mechanism for autonomous experiment iteration. An agent should insert alerts into training code for diagnostic conditions (loss spikes, NaN gradients, low accuracy, training stalls). Since alerts are printed to the terminal, an agent that is watching the training script's output will see them automatically. For background or detached runs, the agent can poll via CLI instead.
→ See references/alerts.md for the full alerts API, webhook setup, and autonomous agent workflows.
Use the trackio command to query logged metrics and alerts:
trackio list projects/runs/metrics — discover what's availabletrackio get project/run/metric — retrieve summaries and valuestrackio list alerts --project <name> --json — retrieve alertstrackio show — launch the dashboardtrackio sync — sync to HF SpaceKey concept: Add --json for programmatic output suitable for automation and LLM agents.
→ See references/retrieving_metrics.md for all commands, workflows, and JSON output formats.
import trackio
# Spaces are PUBLIC by default (good for shareable dashboards);
# pass private=True if the metrics should not be public
trackio.init(project="my-project", space_id="username/trackio", private=True)
trackio.log({"loss": 0.1, "accuracy": 0.9})
trackio.log({"loss": 0.09, "accuracy": 0.91})
trackio.finish()
trackio list projects --json
trackio get metric --project my-project --run my-run --metric loss --json
When running experiments autonomously as an LLM agent, the recommended workflow is:
trackio.alert() calls for diagnostic conditionstrackio list alerts --project <name> --json --since <timestamp> to check for new alertstrackio get metric ... to inspect specific valuesimport trackio
trackio.init(project="my-project", config={"lr": 1e-4})
for step in range(num_steps):
loss = train_step()
trackio.log({"loss": loss, "step": step})
if step > 100 and loss > 5.0:
trackio.alert(
title="Loss divergence",
text=f"Loss {loss:.4f} still high after {step} steps",
level=trackio.AlertLevel.ERROR,
)
if step > 0 and abs(loss) < 1e-8:
trackio.alert(
title="Vanishing loss",
text="Loss near zero — possible gradient collapse",
level=trackio.AlertLevel.WARN,
)
trackio.finish()
Then poll from a separate terminal/process:
trackio list alerts --project my-project --json --since "2025-01-01T00:00:00"
<!-- MCP:START -->
<!-- PORTABILITY:START -->
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
$CODEX_HOME/skills/huggingface-trackio and restart Codex after major changes.Preferred MCP Server: None required
huggingface-trackio outside its documented task boundary.Before claiming the huggingface-trackio workflow succeeded:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。