AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, scaffold, or edit Jupyter notebooks (`.ipynb`) for experiments, explorations, or tutorials; prefer the bundled templates and helper script for reproducible notebook structure and safer editing.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Create clean, reproducible Jupyter notebooks for two primary modes:
Prefer the bundled templates and the helper script for consistent structure and fewer JSON mistakes.
.ipynb notebook from scratch.experiment.tutorial.export CODEX_HOME="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}"
export JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI="$CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook/scripts/new_notebook.py"
User-scoped skills install under $CODEX_HOME/skills (default: ~/.codex/skills).
Lock the intent.
Identify the notebook kind: experiment or tutorial.
Capture the objective, audience, and what "done" looks like.
Scaffold from the template. Use the helper script to avoid hand-authoring raw notebook JSON.
uv run --python 3.12 python "$JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI" \
--kind experiment \
--title "Compare prompt variants" \
--out output/jupyter-notebook/compare-prompt-variants.ipynb
uv run --python 3.12 python "$JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI" \
--kind tutorial \
--title "Intro to embeddings" \
--out output/jupyter-notebook/intro-to-embeddings.ipynb
Fill the notebook with small, runnable steps. Keep each code cell focused on one step. Add short markdown cells that explain the purpose and expected result. Avoid large, noisy outputs when a short summary works.
Apply the right pattern.
For experiments, follow references/experiment-patterns.md.
For tutorials, follow references/tutorial-patterns.md.
Edit safely when working with existing notebooks.
Preserve the notebook structure; avoid reordering cells unless it improves the top-to-bottom story.
Prefer targeted edits over full rewrites.
If you must edit raw JSON, review references/notebook-structure.md first.
Validate the result.
Run the notebook top-to-bottom when the environment allows.
If execution is not possible, say so explicitly and call out how to validate locally.
Use the final pass checklist in references/quality-checklist.md.
assets/experiment-template.ipynb and assets/tutorial-template.ipynb.Script path:
$JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI (installed default: $CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook/scripts/new_notebook.py)tmp/jupyter-notebook/ for intermediate files; delete when done.output/jupyter-notebook/ when working in this repo.ablation-temperature.ipynb).Prefer uv for dependency management.
Optional Python packages for local notebook execution:
uv pip install jupyterlab ipykernel
The bundled scaffold script uses only the Python standard library and does not require extra dependencies.
No required environment variables.
references/experiment-patterns.md: experiment structure and heuristics.references/tutorial-patterns.md: tutorial structure and teaching flow.references/notebook-structure.md: notebook JSON shape and safe editing rules.references/quality-checklist.md: final validation checklist.This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
$CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook and restart Codex after major changes.No dedicated MCP server is required for the normal workflow in this skill.
Preferred MCP Server: None required
Fallback prompt: Use the bundled new_notebook.py scaffold, local Jupyter tooling, and notebook execution logs as the fallback evidence path when no notebook-aware MCP surface is available.
codebase-to-coursenotebooklm-managementexcel-sheetdocumentation-authoringまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。