本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

jupyter-notebook

Use when the user asks to create, scaffold, or edit Jupyter notebooks (`.ipynb`) for experiments, explorations, or tutorials; prefer the bundled templates and helper script for reproducible notebook structure and safer editing.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md2.8 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Jupyter Notebook Skill

Create clean, reproducible Jupyter notebooks for two primary modes:

  • Experiments and exploratory analysis
  • Tutorials and teaching-oriented walkthroughs

Prefer the bundled templates and the helper script for consistent structure and fewer JSON mistakes.

When to use

  • Create a new .ipynb notebook from scratch.
  • Convert rough notes or scripts into a structured notebook.
  • Refactor an existing notebook to be more reproducible and skimmable.
  • Build experiments or tutorials that will be read or re-run by other people.

Decision tree

  • If the request is exploratory, analytical, or hypothesis-driven, choose experiment.
  • If the request is instructional, step-by-step, or audience-specific, choose tutorial.
  • If editing an existing notebook, treat it as a refactor: preserve intent and improve structure.

Skill path (set once)

export CODEX_HOME="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}"
export JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI="$CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook/scripts/new_notebook.py"

User-scoped skills install under $CODEX_HOME/skills (default: ~/.codex/skills).

Workflow

  1. Lock the intent. Identify the notebook kind: experiment or tutorial. Capture the objective, audience, and what "done" looks like.

  2. Scaffold from the template. Use the helper script to avoid hand-authoring raw notebook JSON.

uv run --python 3.12 python "$JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI" \
  --kind experiment \
  --title "Compare prompt variants" \
  --out output/jupyter-notebook/compare-prompt-variants.ipynb
uv run --python 3.12 python "$JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI" \
  --kind tutorial \
  --title "Intro to embeddings" \
  --out output/jupyter-notebook/intro-to-embeddings.ipynb
  1. Fill the notebook with small, runnable steps. Keep each code cell focused on one step. Add short markdown cells that explain the purpose and expected result. Avoid large, noisy outputs when a short summary works.

  2. Apply the right pattern. For experiments, follow references/experiment-patterns.md. For tutorials, follow references/tutorial-patterns.md.

  3. Edit safely when working with existing notebooks. Preserve the notebook structure; avoid reordering cells unless it improves the top-to-bottom story. Prefer targeted edits over full rewrites. If you must edit raw JSON, review references/notebook-structure.md first.

  4. Validate the result. Run the notebook top-to-bottom when the environment allows. If execution is not possible, say so explicitly and call out how to validate locally. Use the final pass checklist in references/quality-checklist.md.

Templates and helper script

  • Templates live in assets/experiment-template.ipynb and assets/tutorial-template.ipynb.
  • The helper script loads a template, updates the title cell, and writes a notebook.

Script path:

  • $JUPYTER_NOTEBOOK_CLI (installed default: $CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook/scripts/new_notebook.py)

Temp and output conventions

  • Use tmp/jupyter-notebook/ for intermediate files; delete when done.
  • Write final artifacts under output/jupyter-notebook/ when working in this repo.
  • Use stable, descriptive filenames (for example, ablation-temperature.ipynb).

Dependencies (install only when needed)

Prefer uv for dependency management.

Optional Python packages for local notebook execution:

uv pip install jupyterlab ipykernel

The bundled scaffold script uses only the Python standard library and does not require extra dependencies.

Environment

No required environment variables.

Reference map

  • references/experiment-patterns.md: experiment structure and heuristics.
  • references/tutorial-patterns.md: tutorial structure and teaching flow.
  • references/notebook-structure.md: notebook JSON shape and safe editing rules.
  • references/quality-checklist.md: final validation checklist.

Anti-Patterns

  • Hand-authoring raw notebook JSON when the bundled scaffold or a targeted cell edit would avoid avoidable formatting mistakes.
  • Packing large exploratory leaps into one noisy cell instead of building small, runnable notebook steps with short narrative bridges.
  • Presenting a notebook as validated when it has not been run top-to-bottom or the execution limitation has not been disclosed.

Verification Protocol

  1. Pass/fail: the notebook opens successfully and the structure, title, and requested sections match the chosen experiment or tutorial pattern.
  2. Pressure test: execute the notebook top-to-bottom when the environment allows, or validate the JSON plus template structure and call out any runtime gap explicitly.
  3. Success metric: no malformed notebook JSON and a clear top-to-bottom flow with runnable or clearly marked cells.
<!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/jupyter-notebook and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

No dedicated MCP server is required for the normal workflow in this skill.

Preferred MCP Server: None required Fallback prompt: Use the bundled new_notebook.py scaffold, local Jupyter tooling, and notebook execution logs as the fallback evidence path when no notebook-aware MCP surface is available.

Related Skills

  • codebase-to-course
  • notebooklm-management
  • excel-sheet
  • documentation-authoring

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する