本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

powerbi-modeling

Power BI semantic models - DAX measures, star schemas, relationships, RLS, and performance tuning via MCP. Use when creating data models, writing DAX, or configuring table relationships in Power BI.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.3 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Power BI Modeling

Tech Stack Target / Version: Power BI Desktop current release, Tabular Editor, DAX Studio, and Fabric semantic-model workflows.

Use this skill when the work is inside a Power BI semantic model rather than a generic SQL schema or spreadsheet.

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

  • Designing or cleaning up a star schema
  • Creating or reviewing DAX measures
  • Configuring relationships and cross-filter direction
  • Implementing row-level security
  • Auditing model health and performance

Practical Workflow

  1. Inspect the current model before changing anything.
  2. Classify tables as dimension, fact, bridge, or helper tables.
  3. Prefer explicit measures over implicit aggregation.
  4. Keep relationships simple and single-direction unless the use case is proven.
  5. Hide technical fields from report authors.

MCP Reality

Power BI model tooling is host-specific. If your client exposes a Power BI modeling MCP server, inspect the available operations first and map them to the model areas you need: connections, tables, columns, measures, relationships, DAX queries, and security roles.

For Microsoft documentation, the Microsoft Learn MCP server is a good companion. Prefer:

  • microsoft_docs_search_by_product with power-bi
  • microsoft_docs_fetch for the final page

Anti-Patterns

  • Treating source content as already clean: Formatting automation will happily preserve broken or inconsistent input.
  • Skipping an open-file verification pass: Documents and spreadsheets often fail in the destination app, not in the script output.
  • Automating irreversible edits without checkpoints: A small mapping mistake can affect an entire workbook or document.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Powerbi Modeling implementation names the target runtime, framework version, and affected files.
  2. Pass/fail: Build, lint, test, or equivalent local validation is run for the changed surface.
  3. Pass/fail: Edge cases for errors, dependency drift, and environment differences are addressed or explicitly out of scope.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a change that passes happy-path tests but fails one boundary condition.
  5. Success metric: Zero untested success claims; every implementation claim maps to a command or artifact.

References & Resources

Documentation

Scripts

Examples

<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/powerbi-modeling and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: Power BI MCP

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Power BI Modeling skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • Use Power BI Desktop, Tabular Editor, DAX Studio, and exported model metadata when the MCP surface is unavailable.
  • Validate measures, relationships, and performance with local model tools before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • documentation-authoring: Use it when the workflow also needs drafting structured technical or product documents.
  • notion-docs: Use it when the workflow also needs Notion page and database publishing workflows.
  • pdf: Use it when the workflow also needs PDF extraction, generation, and layout-aware review.
  • word-document: Use it when the workflow also needs Word document authoring and formatting workflows.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する