本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bend-proof

Prove selected properties of Bend modules when a plan has chosen Bend proof work, the user explicitly requests it, or an existing project proof contract needs maintenance. Mathematical or pure-function labels alone do not trigger this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-baseスター 9(GitHub 9 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml268 B
  • references/minimal-example.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Bend Proof

Use Bend proofs to supplement independent review and necessary tests. Keep the target project's laws, proofs, implementation, and tests together. For a first example or command setup, read the verified minimal example.

Bind the claim

Recover the selected properties, preconditions, domain, allowed edits, protected property files, gate IDs, budget, and unfinished-work handling from the plan or existing project contract. If these leave a material ambiguity, stop the affected step and resolve it through plan revision. Explicit proof requests still need a bounded claim before implementation.

Trace proof imports through laws to the actual implementation and inspect whether the properties capture the requested behavior. For a sorter, ordering alone permits an always-empty result; preserving the input elements also matters. Preserve agreed laws: a property change needs explicit plan revision. Keep proof files without a runtime entry point and runtime examples in tests.

Check and record

Use the project's pinned tools and commands. The reference was verified with Bend 2.0.38 and Lean 4.34.0. bend PROOF.bend gives quick feedback; bend PROOF.bend --verdict is the formal proof gate. Record both separately. In this release, --verdict uses BendTT, an independent checking kernel built from the release's bendtt.lean with Lean 4.34.0 on first use, or selected by BENDTT. Record the kernel's source/build identity or the supplied binary's provenance, along with any BEND_DIR override. A cache hit is not proof evidence.

Before claiming success, verify tool versions (bend version, lean --version when used), checked files and transitive imports, exit status, and diagnostics. ALL PROOFS CHECK alone is insufficient: the ordinary checker prints it too. Confirm the expected properties were checked against the delivered code, not an unrelated file. Check runtime examples against their expected values.

Bind results to the current candidate and environment in the existing gate ledger: record commands/cwd, file identities, tool/kernel identities, exit status, output, and elapsed time. Changes to properties, imports, implementation, commands, tools, or relevant environment invalidate affected evidence. Reuse unchanged evidence only with an explicit mapping to the current delivery.

On failure, distinguish a property counterexample from syntax/import errors, infrastructure failures, and budget exhaustion. Preserve diagnostics and leave the gate unsatisfied using the existing STOP/report procedure. Keep the agreed properties, imports, and gate strength; do not edit them just to obtain a pass. Respect the task's budget; this skill supplies no universal attempt/time limit.

State the coverage

The verdict checks the translated BendTT terms. Bend-to-BendTT translation and correspondence to the intended Bend source remain a trust boundary; the independent kernel does not establish that translation's correctness. State what the claim excludes:

  • A separate reference model proves that model's properties, not an existing Rust/TypeScript implementation. A correspondence argument needs its own evidence.
  • FFI, IO, external services, and runtime effects are outside a pure module claim unless explicitly modeled and connected to the delivered behavior.
  • Mathematical equalities do not establish floating-point error bounds or machine arithmetic behavior without the relevant semantics and assumptions.
  • A source-level verdict does not prove compiler backends, generated binaries, hardware, or the deployed runtime environment correct.

Report these limits and unproved behavior to the reviewer; a verdict never replaces review of property sufficiency or implementation correspondence. Do not automatically migrate a project to Bend or install dependencies. Tool preparation requires task-specific authority; the reference experiment's temporary-tool authorization does not grant installation rights elsewhere.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

adhx

無料

Read public X/Twitter post URLs as structured evidence through the ADHX API. Use for relevant user-provided or research-discovered x.com, twitter.com, or adhx.com links. ADHX does not search X, and long-form Article content may be incomplete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

Design, review, or report a measured performance comparison. Use for benchmark methodology, speedup or regression claims, and performance-based choices; not generic performance discussion, ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, or prose edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

Trace what an actual code change could break beyond its diff when interfaces, serialized data, database schemas, configuration, caches, lifecycle ordering, or cross-language consumers are involved. Use for explicit impact analysis; not local renames, prose edits, ordinary dependency bumps, or generic architecture discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules, interfaces, seams, adapters, leverage, and locality. Use when designing or reshaping module boundaries, making code more testable, or evaluating interface depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

Plan or implement retirement of a system, API, feature, persisted configuration, or database shape. Use for compatibility cutovers, explicit deprecation review, or an explicit unreleased replacement decision, including determining whether consumers or data exist; not ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, prose edits, or generic architecture discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and performance problems with unclear cause. Use for root-cause debugging after a concrete symptom exists; do not use for routine implementation or speculative cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月28日 更新

bioinformatist のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する