本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

latex-thesis-zh

Chinese LaTeX thesis assistant for existing .tex degree thesis projects (XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX/latexmk). Use this skill whenever a user works on a Chinese master's or doctoral thesis needing compilation, GB/T 7714 bibliography checks, chapter structure mapping, template detection (thuthesis, pkuthss), terminology consistency, logic coherence review, heading lead-in checks, title optimization, de-AI editing, experiment chapter review, three-line table validation, or abstract structure diagnosis. Trigger even for single issues like "帮我编译论文", "检查国标格式", "看看绪论逻辑", "毕业论文", "学位论文", "硕士/博士论文", "三线表", "检查摘要", or "摘要结构".

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(50)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml348 B
  • evals/evals.json7.1 KB
  • examples/bibliography-and-deai.md525 B
  • examples/compile-and-template.md463 B
  • examples/structure-and-consistency.md544 B
  • references/ABSTRACT_STRUCTURE.md4.9 KB
  • references/ACADEMIC_STYLE_ZH.md3.8 KB
  • references/CAPTION_GUIDE.md2.2 KB
  • references/COMPILATION.md2.0 KB
  • references/DEAI_GUIDE.md17.8 KB
  • references/FORBIDDEN_TERMS.md1.3 KB
  • references/GB_STANDARD.md3.8 KB
  • references/LOGIC_COHERENCE.md7.4 KB
  • references/modules/ABSTRACT.md1.2 KB
  • references/modules/BIBLIOGRAPHY.md1.3 KB
  • references/modules/COMPILE.md1.1 KB
  • references/modules/CONSISTENCY.md2.1 KB
  • references/modules/DEAI.md1.6 KB
  • references/modules/EXPERIMENT.md4.9 KB
  • references/modules/FORMAT.md988 B
  • references/modules/LOGIC.md2.3 KB
  • references/modules/TABLES.md1.3 KB
  • references/modules/TEMPLATE.md1.3 KB
  • references/modules/TITLE.md1.5 KB
  • references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md4.2 KB
  • references/TABLE_GUIDE.md2.6 KB
  • references/TITLE_OPTIMIZATION.md7.1 KB
  • references/UNIVERSITIES/generic.md2.1 KB
  • references/UNIVERSITIES/pku.md1.5 KB
  • references/UNIVERSITIES/tsinghua.md1.3 KB
  • references/UNIVERSITIES/yanshan.md1.2 KB
  • references/WRITING_PHILOSOPHY_ZH.md4.9 KB
  • scripts/analyze_abstract.py17.3 KB
  • scripts/analyze_experiment.py10.3 KB
  • scripts/analyze_logic.py24.2 KB
  • scripts/check_consistency.py12.1 KB
  • scripts/check_format.py7.0 KB
  • scripts/check_references.py17.6 KB
  • scripts/check_tables.py16.3 KB
  • scripts/compile.py15.8 KB
  • scripts/deai_batch.py10.0 KB
  • scripts/deai_check.py18.1 KB
  • scripts/detect_template.py3.7 KB
  • scripts/generate_table.py8.8 KB
  • scripts/map_structure.py11.3 KB
  • scripts/online_bib_verify.py11.9 KB
  • scripts/optimize_title.py12.5 KB
  • scripts/parsers.py10.7 KB
  • scripts/verify_bib.py9.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

LaTeX 中文学位论文助手

使用此 skill 处理已有中文 LaTeX 学位论文项目中的定向问题。保持低摩擦:先判断最小匹配模块,再运行对应脚本,最后以论文审阅友好的格式返回问题和建议。

Capability Summary

  • 编译并诊断 XeLaTeX / LuaLaTeX / latexmk 构建问题。
  • 检查论文格式、GB/T 7714 相关要求、章节结构、模板类型和术语一致性。
  • 审阅逻辑连贯性、文献综述质量、章节/小节/四级标题导语完整性、实验章节写法、标题表达与 AI 痕迹。
  • 在不破坏引用、标签和数学环境的前提下给出可落地的中文论文修改建议。

Triggering

当用户拥有一个现有中文 .tex 学位论文项目,并希望你帮助处理以下任务时使用本 skill:

  • 编译失败或工具链不确定
  • 学位论文格式、国标或学校模板检查
  • 章节结构梳理或模板识别
  • 术语、缩略语、命名一致性检查
  • 逻辑连贯性、文献综述质量、标题后导语完整性、跨章节闭合检查
  • 标题优化、学术表达或去 AI 化检查
  • 实验章节语言与结构审阅

即使用户只提到单一问题,例如“帮我判断是不是 thuthesis”“检查绪论逻辑”或“按 GB/T 7714 看参考文献”,也应触发本 skill。

Do Not Use

不要将此 skill 用于:

  • 英文会议或期刊论文
  • Typst 项目
  • 仅有 DOCX/PDF、没有 LaTeX 源文件的场景
  • 纯文献调研、没有学位论文工程的任务
  • 从零写一篇学位论文
  • 多维度审稿、评分或投稿门控检查(使用 paper-audit)
  • 英文会议/期刊论文编辑(使用 latex-paper-en)

Module Router

ModuleUse whenPrimary commandRead next
compileThesis build fails or toolchain is unclearuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/compile.py main.texreferences/modules/COMPILE.md
formatUser asks about thesis formatting or GB/T 7714 layoutuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check_format.py main.texreferences/modules/FORMAT.md
structureNeed chapter/section map or thesis skeleton overviewuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/map_structure.py main.texreferences/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
consistencyTerms, abbreviations, or naming drift across chaptersuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check_consistency.py main.tex --termsreferences/modules/CONSISTENCY.md
templateNeed to identify or validate thesis class/templateuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/detect_template.py main.texreferences/modules/TEMPLATE.md
bibliographyGB/T 7714 or BibTeX validationuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/verify_bib.py references.bib --standard gb7714references/modules/BIBLIOGRAPHY.md
titleOptimize Chinese thesis titles and chapter titlesuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/optimize_title.py main.tex --checkreferences/modules/TITLE.md
deaiReduce AI-writing traces in visible Chinese proseuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/deai_check.py main.tex --section introductionreferences/modules/DEAI.md
logicCheck logical coherence, introduction funnel, heading lead-ins, lit review quality, chapter mainline, and cross-section closureuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/analyze_logic.py main.tex --section relatedreferences/modules/LOGIC.md
experimentReview experiment chapter language, discussion layering, and conclusion completenessuv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/analyze_experiment.py main.tex --section experimentsreferences/modules/EXPERIMENT.md
tables表格结构校验、三线表生成、booktabs 检查uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check_tables.py main.texreferences/modules/TABLES.md
abstract摘要五要素结构诊断与字数校验uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/analyze_abstract.py main.tex --lang zhreferences/modules/ABSTRACT.md

Required Inputs

  • 论文入口文件,例如 main.tex。
  • 可选 --section SECTION,当用户只关注某一章或某一节。
  • 可选 bibliography 路径,当任务聚焦参考文献。
  • 可选学校/模板上下文,当用户关心 thuthesis、pkuthss 或特定高校要求。

如果参数不完整,只追问入口 .tex 文件和目标模块,不额外扩展问题。

Output Contract

  • 尽量使用 LaTeX 友好的审阅格式返回问题:% MODULE (L##) [Severity] [Priority]: ...
  • 明确给出执行的命令;若脚本失败,必须报告退出码和关键 stderr。
  • 将“检查结果”和“建议改写”分开陈述,避免把脚本诊断和正文润色混在一起。
  • 默认保留 \cite{}、\ref{}、\label{}、数学环境、参考文献键和模板宏命令。

Workflow

  1. Parse $ARGUMENTS for entry file and module. If missing, ask for the thesis .tex entry file and target module.
  2. Read the one reference file tied to that module (see "Read next" column).
  3. Run the corresponding script with uv run python ....
  4. Return findings as % Module (L##) [Severity] [Priority]: .... Report exact command and exit code on failure.
  5. If template and structure are both unclear, run template first, then structure.

Safety Boundaries

  • Never fabricate citations, funding statements, acknowledgements, or academic claims.
  • Never rewrite \cite{}, \ref{}, \label{}, math blocks, or bibliography keys unless explicitly asked.
  • Treat title suggestions, de-AI revisions, and logic comments as proposals; keep source-preserving checks separate from edits.

Reference Map

  • references/COMPILATION.md: compilation strategy and toolchain diagnosis.
  • references/GB_STANDARD.md: GB/T 7714 and bibliography-related checks.
  • references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md: thesis structure expectations and chapter mapping.
  • references/LOGIC_COHERENCE.md: logic, coherence, heading lead-ins, consistency, and literature-review expectations.
  • references/TITLE_OPTIMIZATION.md: Chinese academic title heuristics.
  • references/DEAI_GUIDE.md: de-AI review heuristics.
  • references/modules/EXPERIMENT.md: experiment-chapter review criteria.
  • references/UNIVERSITIES/: school/template-specific constraints after template detection.

只读取当前模块所需的参考文件,避免一次加载整套指南。

Example Requests

  • “帮我定位这个中文学位论文 main.tex 为什么 XeLaTeX 一直编译失败,并判断是不是 thuthesis 模板。”
  • “请梳理这篇硕士论文的章节结构,并检查术语和缩略语是否前后统一。”
  • “按 GB/T 7714 帮我检查参考文献,再看看绪论是不是有明显 AI 腔。”
  • “检查 related work 的逻辑链条和研究空白推导,但不要动任何引用和公式。”
  • “帮我检查每一章、每一节、四级标题后有没有先写导语,不要只看格式。”

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する