本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

adoption-summary

Produces structured U.S. adoption-law summaries for litigation and client-facing use. Use when asked to summarize adoption law, draft pre-filing research briefs, create jurisdiction-specific issue memoranda, or prepare client education documents. Triggers: adoption summary, domestic adoption, intercountry adoption, Hague adoption, foster care adoption, TPR in adoption, stepparent/relative adoption, post-adoption rights.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Adoption Law Summary

Generates a concise, jurisdiction-aware legal briefing on adoption law with litigation and counseling value.

Quick Start

  1. Identify jurisdiction (U.S. state + foreign country if intercountry).
  2. Confirm adoption type: domestic (agency/private/stepparent/relative), intercountry, foster care, or mixed.
  3. Collect factual posture: petitioner identity, child status, custody/guardianship, dependency, pending appeals.
  4. Gather sources: petitions, court orders, social-work reports, consents, agency/immigration docs.
  5. Confirm depth: high-level primer, pre-filing analysis, or form-completion advisory.
  6. Set output mode: neutral overview, strategy memo, or party-side briefing.

Output Structure

1) Header Block

FieldValue
JurisdictionFederal + state/country
Matter typeDomestic / Intercountry / Foster / Mixed
PartiesBiological parent(s), adoptive petitioner(s), child, agency/state
IssuesConsent, TPR, best interests, eligibility, immigration, records, disputes
Authority classesConstitution, statutes, regulations, key cases, local rules
Verification statusVerified / Verify locally / [VERIFY]

2) Legal Framework

Lead with constitutional/statutory stack. Separate non-waivable federal requirements from state-specific rules. Note venue, notice, and record-retention obligations.

LayerCore rulePractical effect
ConstitutionalDue process in parental-liberty interestsRequires notice/fair procedures before rights loss
Federal baselineAdoption and Safe Families Act (dependency cases) [VERIFY]Permanency timelines, child welfare policy
State adoption codeProcedure, consent, filing mechanicsPetition form, hearing rights, contest timeline
Agency/court rulesLocal rule supplementsService, forms, evidentiary requirements

3) Domestic Adoption Workflows

TypeCore requirementsConsent mechanicsCommon failure points
AgencyScreening, home study, court reviewBio-parent consent per statute; agency may petitionIncomplete disclosures, study defects
PrivateParental/child suitability proofStricter identity/financial scrutinyHidden agreements, notice defects
StepparentShort-form in some statesVaries by state for non-consenting parentFraud in consent facts; prior custody orders
RelativePriority/fast-track provisionsBackground checks with kinship exceptionsKinship conflict, prior abuse findings

4) Parental Rights Termination

Distinguish voluntary consent, delayed revocation, and involuntary termination. Cover standing, burden of proof, notice, counsel rights, and appeals.

IssueStandardNotes
Involuntary TPRClear-and-convincing evidence [VERIFY]Service/hearing defects are common reversible issues
Unmarried father rightsRegistry, acknowledgment, relationship evidence [VERIFY]Varies sharply by state
Consent defectsCapacity, coercion, fraud, statutory defects [VERIFY]Challenge window is jurisdiction-dependent

5) Intercountry Adoption

Address Hague Convention (treaty vs non-treaty routes), origin-country dependency, U.S. admissibility sequence, visa pathway, and post-adoption reporting.

TopicRequired outputs
Authority chainOrigin-country eligibility + U.S. DHS/State/consular coordination
ImmigrationIR-3 / IR-4 framework and citizenship timeline [VERIFY]
DocumentationTranslation/authentication + apostille where applicable
Risk controlsFraud indicators, age limits, travel/certificate validity

6) Foster Care / Dependency Pathway

ComponentControls
TPR contextDependency findings, reunification efforts, court findings
Child welfarePermanency deadlines, federal/state case-plan compliance
ICWA overlayTribal notice, placement preferences, heightened evidentiary safeguards [VERIFY]
FinancialSubsidies, support eligibility, post-placement services

7) Post-Adoption Effects

Cover: inheritance/intestacy, birth certificate rules, confidentiality/access, open-adoption agreements, tax/subsidy interactions, disruption/annulment status. Flag whether remedies are enforceable as contract, court order, or standing-only in each jurisdiction.

8) Emerging Issues

Flag with date and jurisdiction: same-sex couple adoption, assisted reproduction intersections, adult adoption, recent statutes/cases.

9) Quality Block

  • Executive takeaway: 3-6 bullets.
  • Risk matrix: Issue | Likely impact.
  • Verification docket: Task | Jurisdiction | Source.

Pitfalls

  • Always use [VERIFY] for unconfirmed statute numbers, case citations, timelines, or visa classifications.
  • If jurisdiction is unspecified, label output as "general U.S. baseline + state-specific verification required."
  • Separate verified authority from assumptions throughout.
  • Keep section order stable across outputs for repeatability.

End every output with: "General legal information only; not legal advice. Confirm governing statutes, local rules, and current case law before filing."


Key changes made:

  • Frontmatter: Removed tags (not part of the spec), tightened description to focus on trigger guidance and kept under 1024 chars.
  • Structure: Renamed "Prerequisites" to "Quick Start", renamed "Output Structure / Process" to "Output Structure", added "Pitfalls" section per best practices.
  • Conciseness: Trimmed verbose table cell text (e.g., "Protects parental autonomy and requires notice/fair procedures before severe rights loss" → "Requires notice/fair procedures before rights loss"), removed redundant prose in section intros, collapsed the Guidelines section into a tighter Pitfalls checklist.
  • Line count: Reduced from 116 lines to 104 lines while preserving all domain-accurate legal content and the full 9-section output structure.

It looks like the file write permission wasn't granted. Would you like me to try writing it again?

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する