本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

akylegal-applications

Comprehensive legal applications skill covering civil/criminal/administrative litigation workflows, trial defense strategies, legal document drafting (complaints, answers, appeals, retrial petitions, enforcement applications, representation opinions, defense statements, legal opinions, etc.), arbitration (commercial & labor), mediation, enforcement procedures, evidence rules, and litigation risk assessment. Trigger when users ask about: lawsuit/litigation/trial, legal documents, court defense, evidence/cross-examination, arbitration, enforcement, legal strategy, filing a case, appeal, retrial, representation, pleading, or any legal procedural guidance.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md10.9 KB
  • _meta.json140 B
  • references/admin-procedure.md7.3 KB
  • references/arbitration.md18.2 KB
  • references/civil-procedure.md7.7 KB
  • references/criminal-procedure.md8.8 KB
  • references/evidence-rules.md10.4 KB
  • references/legal-document-templates.md15.2 KB
  • references/trial-practice.md8.6 KB
  • skill-card.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Comprehensive Legal Applications (全维法律应用技能包)

A comprehensive legal practice skill covering the full lifecycle from case intake to enforcement. This skill complements existing legal skills (contract review, criminal defense, labor law, due diligence, etc.) with a focus on litigation practice and legal document drafting.


I. Skill Architecture

Comprehensive Legal Applications
├── Litigation Workflows       → Civil / Criminal / Administrative
├── Trial Practice             → Court Preparation / Defense / Cross-Examination
├── Legal Document Drafting    → Complaints / Answers / Appeals / Opinions
├── Non-Contentious Procedures → Arbitration / Mediation / Admin Review
├── Enforcement                → Execution Applications / Objections
└── Litigation Strategy        → Risk Assessment / Cost-Benefit Analysis

II. Core Workflows

Workflow A: Litigation Procedure Guidance

When the user needs procedural guidance for civil, criminal, or administrative litigation:

Step 1: Identify case type
    ├── Civil dispute → Read references/civil-procedure.md
    ├── Criminal case → Read references/criminal-procedure.md
    └── Admin dispute → Read references/admin-procedure.md

Step 2: Determine current stage
    ├── Pre-filing → Evidence collection + pre-action preservation + jurisdiction
    ├── Filing → Filing materials checklist + jurisdiction rules
    ├── First instance → Evidence deadlines + trial prep + cross-examination plan
    ├── Appeal → Appeal deadline: 15 days(civil)/10 days(criminal) + draft appeal
    ├── Retrial → Apply within 6 months + retrial grounds analysis
    └── Enforcement → Enforcement application + objections

Step 3: Output stage-specific guidance
    - Time limits and deadlines for this stage
    - Required documents
    - Key legal risk warnings
    - Strategic recommendations

Workflow B: Trial Defense & Cross-Examination

When the user needs to prepare for trial, needs defense strategy, or cross-examination plans:

Step 1: Identify trial type and role
    ├── Plaintiff/Prosecution: Claims + evidence presentation + cross-examination
    ├── Defendant/Defense: Defense + evidence + cross-examination
    └── Third party / Appellant / Respondent: Role-specific strategy

Step 2: Generate trial plan based on role
    Plaintiff/Prosecution:
        - Core claims → evidence list → examination outline
        - Anticipate defense counterarguments → prepare rebuttals
        - Predict trial focus points → outline closing arguments

    Defendant/Defense:
        - Core defense position → cross-examination plan
        - Analyze plaintiff's evidence on three dimensions (authenticity/legality/relevance)
        - Prepare counter-evidence / corroborating evidence

    General preparation:
        - Questioning outlines (for opposing party/witnesses/experts)
        - Legal authority index (compiled statutes)
        - Comparable case research report (to persuade judge)

Step 3: Generate trial document package
    └── See Legal Document Drafting and references/trial-practice.md

Workflow C: Legal Document Drafting

When the user needs to draft legal documents, select the template by document type:

Document TypeReferenceApproach
Civil Complaintreferences/legal-document-templates.md → ComplaintExtract case elements → Fill template → Verify legal basis
Civil Answerreferences/legal-document-templates.md → AnswerRespond to complaint point by point
Appealreferences/legal-document-templates.md → AppealNote deadline + appeal request + facts & reasons
Retrial Petitionreferences/legal-document-templates.md → Retrial6-month deadline check + cite statutory retrial grounds
Representation/Defense Statementreferences/legal-document-templates.md → RepresentationTrial focus + factual argument + legal application
Enforcement Applicationreferences/legal-document-templates.md → EnforcementFinal judgment + debtor's asset leads
Asset Preservation Applicationreferences/legal-document-templates.md → PreservationSecurity method + scope of preservation
Jurisdictional Objectionreferences/legal-document-templates.md → JurisdictionJurisdiction rules + objection grounds
Evidence Investigation Applicationreferences/legal-document-templates.md → InvestigationEvidence leads + application reasons
Enforcement Objectionreferences/legal-document-templates.md → ObjectionObjection type analysis + statutory grounds
Cross-Examination Opinionreferences/legal-document-templates.md → Cross-ExaminationThree-dimensional evidence analysis
Legal Opinionreferences/legal-document-templates.md → Legal OpinionFacts → Legal analysis → Conclusion & recommendations

General drafting rules:

  1. Collect essential case elements (party info, cause of action, facts, relief sought)
  2. Follow correct document format (court name, case number, requests, facts & reasons)
  3. Verify statute of limitations / appeal deadlines / application deadlines
  4. Cite precise legal provisions (full name + article number)
  5. Provide review checklist after draft completion

Workflow D: Arbitration Procedure Guidance

When the user needs arbitration procedure guidance or to draft arbitration documents:

Step 1: Identify arbitration type
    ├── Commercial arbitration (contracts / other commercial disputes)
    ├── Labor arbitration (mandatory pre-litigation procedure)
    └── International arbitration (cross-border parties / international rules)

Step 2: Verify arbitration foundation
    ├── Is there a valid arbitration agreement?
    ├── Does the agreement specify a clear arbitration institution?
    └── Is the dispute within the scope of arbitrable matters?
        → If no valid agreement, recommend litigation route

Step 3: Guide arbitration process
    ├── Application → Draft arbitration application materials
    ├── Tribunal formation → Select arbitrators / sole arbitrator
    ├── Hearing → Evidence + examination + written/oral hearing
    ├── Award → Award types / finality of award
    └── Post-award remedies → Set aside / enforcement / non-enforcement
        → See references/arbitration.md

Step 4: Distinguish labor arbitration
    ├── Labor arbitration is a mandatory prerequisite to litigation
    ├── No arbitration agreement needed; apply directly to labor arbitration committee
    ├── 1-year statute of limitations
    ├── No fee
    ├── After award, if dissatisfied → sue in court within 15 days
    └── See references/arbitration.md → Labor Arbitration section

Workflow E: Litigation Strategy Assessment

When the user needs to make a "litigation decision" assessment:

Step 1: Case facts review
    ├── Party information
    ├── Key timeline
    ├── Core legal facts
    └── Existing evidence inventory

Step 2: Legal risk assessment
    ├── Win rate assessment (based on facts + law + comparable cases)
    ├── Cost-benefit analysis (court fees + attorney fees + time cost)
    ├── Enforcement risk assessment (counterparty's solvency)
    └── Procedural risk assessment (statute of limitations / jurisdiction / evidence capacity)

Step 3: Strategic recommendations
    ├── Optimal plan (litigation / mediation / arbitration / negotiation)
    ├── Alternative plan
    └── Risk warnings and mitigation

III. Integration with Existing Legal Skills

This skill complements existing installed legal skills:

ScenarioPrimary SkillSupplementary Skill
Contract dispute litigationThis skill (strategy + documents)contract-risk-reviewer (contract review)
Criminal defensedefense-lawyer (defense strategy)This skill (trial + documents)
Labor dispute arbitrationlabor-law-advisor (labor law)This skill (arbitration procedure + application)
Legal text analysislegal-seven-step-workflow (7-step method)This skill (document drafting)
Rights protection letterlegal-rights-drafter-claw (letters)This skill (subsequent litigation)
Legal concept interpretationlegal-concept-deep-dive (concept deep dive)This skill (trial application strategy)
M&A due diligencelawyer-due-diligence (DD report)This skill (litigation risk for contract terms)

IV. Reference Resources

FileContentWhen to Load
references/civil-procedure.mdCivil litigation full workflow guideWhen handling civil disputes
references/criminal-procedure.mdCriminal case stages and key pointsWhen handling criminal cases
references/admin-procedure.mdAdministrative litigation guideWhen handling administrative cases
references/legal-document-templates.md12 core legal document templatesWhen drafting legal documents
references/trial-practice.mdCourt preparation, defense, cross-examination strategiesWhen preparing for trial
references/evidence-rules.mdBurden of proof, evidence three-dimension test, evidence chainWhen dealing with evidence issues
references/arbitration.mdCommercial arbitration, labor arbitration, international arbitration full workflowWhen handling arbitration/labor arbitration cases

V. Important Notes

  1. All legal documents and strategic recommendations output by this skill are for reference only. Review by a licensed attorney is required before formal use.
  2. Verify all cited laws and regulations for the latest version — AI may not cover recent amendments.
  3. Litigation strategy is highly dependent on individual case details; tailor output to actual case circumstances.
  4. For substantive legal analysis of specific cases, consider coordinating with the legal-seven-step-workflow-mctmilk skill.
  5. Critical deadlines (appeal period, statute of limitations, evidence submission period) must be manually verified.
  6. This skill does not substitute for formal legal advice. For significant cases, retain a qualified attorney.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する