本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

asbestos-abatement-plan

Drafts an asbestos abatement plan compliant with OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 and EPA NESHAP 40 CFR 61 Subpart M. Extracts facility details from uploaded surveys and contractor documents to produce a regulatory filing and operational guide. Use when preparing pre-abatement regulatory submissions, contractor work plans, or facility owner compliance documentation for asbestos removal projects.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Asbestos Abatement Plan

Produces a federally compliant abatement plan serving as both a regulatory filing and operational blueprint for ACM removal. Covers scope, containment, removal methodology, worker protection, air monitoring, waste disposal, and final clearance.

Prerequisites

Before drafting, collect:

  1. Asbestos survey report — inspector name/accreditation, survey date, all ACM locations with material type, condition, friability, mineral type, % content (PLM/TEM), quantities (SF/LF/piece count)
  2. Facility ID — legal entity, address, parcel/tax ID, county, owner/authorized rep, tenant info if applicable
  3. Contractor credentials — license number + expiration, EPA accreditation, competent person name/cert number
  4. Project schedule — start date, phasing, expected completion
  5. NESHAP threshold determination — total friable ACM quantity; thresholds: >260 LF pipe, >160 SF surfacing, or >1 m³ friable ACM

Quick Start

  1. Extract all project specifics from uploaded documents; use [INSERT ___] only where data is unavailable
  2. Determine NESHAP notification status — if thresholds met, 10 working days advance notice to EPA regional office + state agency
  3. Classify each ACM scope item (Class I/II/III) — Class I triggers most stringent OSHA requirements
  4. Draft each output section below in order
  5. Flag state-specific requirements that exceed federal minimums

Output Sections

1. Regulatory Authority & Purpose

  • Cite governing regulations: OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101; EPA NESHAP 40 CFR 61 Subpart M; applicable state regs
  • State plan is the controlling document; deviations require written competent-person approval + agency notification
  • NESHAP notification applicability and deadline
  • Plan availability for OSHA/EPA/state inspectors and employee representatives

2. Project Identification

Table with: facility legal name, address/parcel ID, owner/authorized rep, contractor/license/expiration, EPA accreditation, competent person/cert, project dates. Populate from documents.

3. Scope of Work & ACM Characterization

Reference survey report. Table each ACM location with: material type, friability, condition, asbestos %/mineral, quantity, OSHA class. State aggregate totals and confirm NESHAP threshold status.

4. Work Area Preparation & Containment

  • Regulated area — perimeter barriers + OSHA warning signage at all approaches
  • Critical barriers — 6-mil fire-retardant poly, floor-to-ceiling, all seams/penetrations sealed airtight; HVAC/electrical/plumbing sealed
  • Negative pressure — HEPA-filtered machines, ≥4 air changes/hr, ≥−0.02 in. WC differential (verify each shift), continuous through abatement + ≥24 hrs post-cleaning
  • Decon enclosure — three-chamber (equipment → shower → clean room), hot/cold water, overlapping poly curtains
  • Pre-abatement prep — remove/cover furniture with sealed poly, isolate HVAC, seal outlets/fixtures

5. Removal Methodology

  • Keep ACM continuously wetted with amended water (surfactant) from removal through containerization
  • Work section by section; prefer hand tools over power tools
  • If cutting unavoidable: wet thoroughly, cut slowly, HEPA local exhaust at cut point
  • Waste containerization: friable → double-bagged 6-mil poly (≤2/3 capacity); non-friable → wetted, poly-wrapped; label all containers with OSHA warning + generator name + date
  • Progressive cleaning: HEPA vacuum each shift-end; post-removal cycle: HEPA vacuum → wet wipe → visual inspection → repeat until clean

6. Worker Protection

  • Class I PPE: full-body disposable coveralls with hood/foot coverings; full-face APR with HEPA (APF 50 min) or PAPR (APF 1000); disposable gloves. Half-face not permitted for Class I
  • Respiratory program: PLHCP medical eval, annual fit testing, clean-shaven requirement, seal-check training
  • Decon sequence: (1) equipment room — HEPA vacuum PPE, bag disposables, keep respirator on; (2) shower — full body wash with respirator; (3) clean room — remove respirator, don clean clothing
  • Equipment decon: HEPA vacuum → wet wipe → visual inspection; wrap in poly for transport

7. Air Monitoring Protocol

Sample TypeTimingLocationsMethodAction Level
BackgroundPre-abatement≥3 outside regulated areaPCM/NIOSH 7400Baseline
PersonalDaily during workHighest-exposure workersPCMPEL 0.1 f/cc TWA; STEL 1.0 f/cc
Area perimeterEach shiftOutside barriers, adjacent spacesPCMAbove background → stop/investigate
Final clearancePost-cleaning, ≥24 hr neg. pressure≥5 distributed locationsPCM/NIOSH 7400≤0.01 f/cc
  • Clearance uses aggressive sampling (fans/blowers, door movement, personnel activity)
  • Clearance failure → re-clean, re-sample via NVLAP-accredited independent lab

8. Waste Management & Disposal

  • All waste (ACM, PPE, poly, HEPA filters) = RACWM
  • Secured staging area with warning signs, weather-protected
  • Licensed hauler, enclosed vehicle, waste shipment record per load
  • Permitted asbestos landfill; retain signed disposal receipts as permanent records
  • Maintain tracking log: date, quantity, transporter, destination, shipment record number

9. Emergency Procedures

ScenarioResponse
Containment breachStop work → add negative air → repair → sample adjacent areas → evacuate/clean if fibers confirmed
Worker injuryFirst-aid responds with RPE; move injured through decon or provide RPE to responders
Fire/evacuationDecon exit if safe; direct exit if imminent danger; decon + medical eval post-event
Unexpected ACMStop area work → competent person evaluates → sample → amend plan → update NESHAP if thresholds now exceeded

10. Final Clearance & Project Closeout

Clearance sequence: visual inspection (competent person, supplemental lighting) → ≥24 hrs negative pressure → aggressive air sampling (≥5 samples) → lab results ≤0.01 f/cc → release for reoccupancy

Final report must include: executive summary, work narrative with deviations, all air monitoring results with lab reports/chain of custody, photo documentation (pre/during/post), waste tracking log and shipment records, all licenses/certs, competent person certification statement.

Signatures: competent person, contractor authorized rep, facility owner authorized rep (name, title, date).

Record retention: OSHA requires 30-year minimum. Facility owner maintains as permanent building records accessible to future owners/tenants/contractors. Contractor retains copies; transfers to successor or owner upon cessation.

Post-project filing: check whether state/local agency requires final report submission (commonly 30 days post-completion).

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Extract from documents first — never fabricate project-specific data
  • Confirm NESHAP notification status before drafting; deadline and responsible party must be explicit
  • Verify ACM class for every scope item — Class I triggers strictest OSHA requirements
  • State regs may exceed federal minimums — always flag state-specific requirements
  • Mark uncertain or potentially amended CFR citations with [VERIFY]
  • Describe performance specs, not commercial product names
  • Plan must withstand OSHA/EPA scrutiny as a defensible 30-year permanent record

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する