本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

blue-sky-filings

Produces a practitioner-grade Blue Sky compliance memorandum and execution plan for U.S. securities offerings. Analyzes NSMIA covered securities preemption, classifies offerings under Regulation D/Rule 506 or alternative federal exemptions, maps state jurisdictional nexus distinguishing offers from sales, and generates a state-by-state filing plan with Form D/EFD workflow, fee schedules, amendment triggers, and renewal calendars. Use this skill when advising on private placement Blue Sky compliance, Reg D notice filings, multi-state offering coordination, state securities registration exemptions, Form D filings, EFD submissions, or state fee budgeting. Also trigger when the user mentions covered securities preemption, NSMIA analysis, or asks about state notice filing requirements. Even if the user just says "Blue Sky" or "state filings for our raise," use this skill.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md11.1 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Blue Sky Filings Compliance Workflow

Why This Skill Exists

Blue Sky compliance is one of the most common sources of post-closing securities exposure. Missed state notice filings create rescission rights for investors — a powerful leverage tool in disputes. The complexity comes from the intersection of federal preemption (NSMIA) with 50+ state regimes, each with different deadlines, fees, forms, and renewal requirements. When Blue Sky is treated as a back-office afterthought, offerings close with gaps that surface as litigation risk years later.

This skill produces an integrated compliance memo and execution plan that prevents those gaps — jurisdictional nexus analysis, preemption classification, and a state-by-state filing plan with timelines and recordkeeping.


Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)

Ask every time unless the user says "use defaults" or "just draft." Gather:

  1. Offering summary — security type, aggregate amount, price/valuation, planned closing dates, single-close vs. rolling/evergreen
  2. Federal legal basis — Rule 506(b), 506(c), 504, Section 4(a)(2), Reg S, registered offering, Rule 147/147A, or other
  3. Offering documents — PPM, investor deck, term sheet, subscription agreement, investor questionnaire, AV verification procedures (if 506(c))
  4. Investor geography — state of residence/domicile (individuals) or principal place of business (entities); states where offers were directed
  5. Intermediaries — identity, geographic footprint, and state registration status of any broker-dealers, finders, or placement agents
  6. First sale date — confirmed or projected
  7. Prior filings — existing Blue Sky matrices, prior Form D filings, ongoing offerings

If the user doesn't respond, apply and clearly label these defaults: Rule 506(b) offering; no general solicitation; single closing; EFD filing method where available.

Optional: priority investor states, issuer type, non-U.S. investors (Reg S interplay), expected secondary transfers or SPV structures.


Step 1: Classify Federal Posture and Covered Security Status

Identify whether securities are "covered securities" under 15 U.S.C. § 77r [VERIFY].

CategoryNSMIA SectionPreempts State Registration?State Authority Preserved
Exchange-listed securities18(b)(1)YesFraud enforcement
Registered investment company securities18(b)(2)Yes (Form NF, not Form D)Fraud enforcement
Rule 506(b) / 506(c) offerings18(b)(4)(F)YesNotice filings, fees, consent to service, fraud
Rule 504 offerings—NoFull state registration authority
Rule 147/147A intrastate—NoFull state registration authority
Section 4(a)(2) (without Rule 506)—Generally noFull state registration authority

For non-covered securities, analyze state pathways: registration by coordination, qualification, notification/filing, or available state exemptions.

Document factual basis for exemption selection — general solicitation analysis, investor qualification method, and why all conditions are satisfied.


Step 2: Map Jurisdictional Nexus (Offers vs. Sales)

For each state, document the factual hook triggering Blue Sky obligations:

  • Location of investors who received offers (critical in 506(c) general solicitation)
  • Location of investors who completed purchases
  • Location of issuer personnel conducting solicitation
  • Accessibility of marketing materials in additional states

Entity investors: Principal place of business, state of formation, and location of investment decision-maker may each matter — confirm which address concept the subscription agreement uses.

Negative space: Document states considered and excluded, with reasoning.

Evidence to preserve: Where subscription materials were sent, investor residency representations, acceptance location, wire origin records.


Step 3: Build State-by-State Compliance Pathway

For each state:

FieldContent
Federal basisExemption relied upon
Preempted?Yes / No per Step 1
State filing methodEFD / direct filing / state portal
Forms requiredForm D copy, Form U-2 (consent to service), state-specific forms
FeeAmount + calculation basis [VERIFY]
DeadlineDays after first sale [VERIFY]
Renewal required?Yes/No; if yes, annual anniversary date
Source URLLink to state regulator's filing page, or [VERIFY]

Intermediary check: NSMIA does not preempt state broker-dealer registration. Confirm placement agents/finders are registered in each solicitation state — an unregistered intermediary can jeopardize the issuer's exemption.

State-specific flags (all require verification):

  • New York — Rule 506 offerings accepted via EFD; legacy GBL § 359-e may add complexity [VERIFY]
  • California — Section 25102(f) for non-Rule-506 private placements requires pre-existing relationships [VERIFY]
  • Texas / Washington — Known to issue comments on notice filings if disclosures deemed insufficient [VERIFY]
  • Merit review states — Confirm state does not impose additional conditions beyond Form D + fee

Step 4: Execute Form D and EFD Filing Workflow

SEC Form D timing: File via EDGAR no later than 15 calendar days after first sale [VERIFY current instructions].

"First sale" = issuer first receives irrevocable consideration (subscription accepted + payment received — not distribution of materials or expressions of interest).

Filing checklist:

  • Confirm first sale date and implicated states
  • Verify Form D fields match offering documents (issuer name, jurisdiction, officers, amount, exemption)
  • File Form D via EDGAR
  • Submit state notices via EFD or direct filing; pay applicable fees
  • Save conformed copies, fee receipts, and state acceptances to closing binder
  • Complete Rule 506(d) bad actor screening for all covered persons — a disqualifying event eliminates Rule 506 and NSMIA preemption entirely

Multi-closing offerings: File additional state notices for each new investor state at or before first sale in that state.

Fee budgeting: Fees range from ~$100 flat to percentage-based with caps, varying significantly by state [all specific amounts require current verification].


Step 5: Manage Amendments, Renewals, and Closing Filings

Form D amendment triggers:

  • Adding general solicitation (requires restructuring 506(b) to 506(c))
  • Change to minimum investment amount
  • Addition or change of placement agent
  • Expansion into new investor states
  • Material change to use of proceeds
  • Increase in total offering amount

Renewal obligations: Many state notices expire 12 months after initial filing. Rolling/evergreen offerings must renew before expiration — a lapse may create rescission exposure.

Closing/final filing: File Form D amendment reporting total amount sold and offering close.

Escalation protocol: "If any investor is added in a state not on the current Blue Sky tracker, counsel must be notified before circulating final subscription documents, and no funds shall be accepted until state notice filing requirements are confirmed."


Step 6: Produce Deliverables

Three integrated layers:

  1. Executive Summary (for CFOs/board) — plain language: what must be done, by when, who is responsible
  2. Legal Analysis — covered securities/preemption framework, chosen exemption and conditions, limits of state authority
  3. Implementation Section — state-by-state filing plan, recordkeeping requirements, escalation rules, compliance calendar

Mandatory Front Matter

Include Assumptions and Open Items listing every [VERIFY] item with:

  • What needs to be confirmed
  • Where/how to confirm it
  • Who is responsible and by when

Checkpoint B: Post-Draft Alignment (Mandatory)

After delivering the initial memo, ask:

  1. Are there additional investor states not yet included in the filing plan?
  2. Is the first sale date confirmed, or should the timeline remain provisional?
  3. Should local Blue Sky counsel be engaged for any specific states?
  4. Does the client need the compliance calendar delivered in a specific format?

Quality Audit

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Preemption determination confirmed with verified statutory citation
  • Every state-specific requirement cites a verifiable source or carries [VERIFY]
  • Offer states and sale states distinguished (not conflated)
  • Form D fields consistent with offering documents
  • Intermediary registration confirmed for each solicitation state
  • Rule 506(d) bad actor screening included in workflow
  • Amendment triggers and renewal dates documented
  • Fee budget aggregated across all filing states
  • Escalation protocol included for new investor states
  • Assumptions and open items listed prominently
  • No state law requirements stated as facts without sourcing

Guidelines

  • Anti-hallucination: Every state-specific requirement (deadline, fee, form, portal) must cite a verifiable primary source URL or carry [VERIFY] — never state state law requirements as facts without sourcing
  • Rescission framing: Primary litigation risk is investor rescission under Section 12 of the Securities Act and analogous state provisions — frame all compliance gaps in terms of this exposure
  • Offer ≠ Sale: Do not conflate; Rule 506(c) general solicitation may expand the offer footprint significantly beyond sales
  • No merit review for covered securities: NSMIA preempts substantive review for Rule 506 — but confirm state is not attempting to impose it
  • Form D consistency: Total offering amount on state EFD filings must match SEC Form D Part C, Question 1
  • Local counsel: Recommend for merit review states, high-profile offerings, or aggressive enforcement states
  • Confidentiality: Treat all drafts as privileged work product under Model Rule 1.6
  • Attorney review required: All output is draft guidance requiring attorney review before use or filing. State administrative rules and fee schedules change frequently; verify all state-specific requirements via primary sources before reliance

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する