initiative

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-ANCHOR:START -->

[BLOCKING] Run declared skill steps in order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge without explicit user approval. [BLOCKING] Update task tracking before/after each step or sub-skill: in_progress → completed. [BLOCKING] Completed steps need brief evidence; skipped steps need an explicit reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, maintain an equivalent tracker with synchronized statuses.

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-ANCHOR:END -->

Renamed: formerly /idea; use /initiative. The old slash command has no alias. /work-item --mode=refine turns the initiative into delivery work.

AI-SDD Artifact Contract (M1–M7): Initiatives stay tech-agnostic business intent; logical IDs belong downstream, and abstract [Source: namespace/service/id] anchors stay in a separate evidence carrier. Keep physical code coordinates and repository paths out of portable narrative. MUST ATTENTION READ .claude/skills/shared/sdd-artifact-contract.md for full mandate and carrier rules. Project Protocol Overlay: Resolve only the most-specific matching tier; derive body paths from overlay names, report malformed or missing bodies, and apply surviving rules additively without waiving framework or user-confirmation gates. MUST ATTENTION READ .claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.md for the full resolution contract.

Work tracking: Keep the project's tracked work current in the same change, as its root instructions (CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md) say. When the project uses the portable tracker (taskTracking.mode is observe or linked), read the linked work integration guide at capture, start, saved-work, verification, handoff and close-out checkpoints. Use the actual linked producer and exact items; retain the primary outcome and record optional upkeep once through the common owner. Continue untracked when no link exists; acceptance remains explicit.

Work record shape: The initiative file is a work record owned by /task-track. Read Records another skill authors before writing or editing it: status: draft on capture, no assignee, and no decision or priority key of this skill's own. Approval and every later status, and the initiative's type, priority level, due date and areas, are tracker values recorded through /task-track; tracker-owned fields of a tracked record change only there.

Quick Summary

Goal: Turn a vague product idea into a validated, tech-agnostic, module-anchored initiative artifact ready for /work-item --mode=refine to convert into a task — preserving problem intent without leaking solution or stack choices.

Summary:

• Purpose: capture raw idea as structured, validated initiative artifact; preserve problem intent, keep the problem statement tech-agnostic with no solution/stack/IDs, and hand clean narrative to /work-item --mode=refine.
• Main steps/tasks (run in order): (1) Gather problem/value/users/scope; (2) Generate INITIATIVE-{YYMMDD}-{NNN} draft from initiative-template.md; (3) Capture problem/value/users; (4) Detect module through project structure and selected-profile canonical indexes/owners silently, prompting only if ambiguous/no match; (5) Load feature context (8-12K tokens: entities, BR-/TC patterns); (6) Save canonical artifact; (6.5) Discovery Interview — ONE interview of 4-6 ask user question tool questions; (7) Validation Summary — written from those answers, then ONE short unconditional ask user question tool confirming the revised problem statement / scope (not a second interview); (8) Suggest /work-item --mode=refine.
• Modes/gates: Existing repo → silently detect module and load context; Greenfield → skip module detection and structure reads, use market/WebSearch context, ask business questions more often, and NEVER ask about tech stack. The Discovery Interview (Step 6.5: 4-6 questions incl. always-on testability, each category asked once) and the Validation Summary with its one confirm question (Step 7) are NON-NEGOTIABLE.
• Output: Persist to initiatives/{YYMMDD}-{role}-initiative-{slug}.md under the team-artifacts root (default team-artifacts; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path) with t_shirt_size; downstream task owns FR-/BR- IDs and inherits the clean narrative.

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION TaskCreate task to READ project-structure-reference.md — project patterns and structure. Not found → search project documentation, coding standards, architecture docs.

Workflow:

1. Gather Info — Ask problem, value, scope, target users
2. Generate Artifact — Create INITIATIVE-YYMMDD-NNN file from template with draft status
3. Capture Details — Record problem statement, value, target users
4. Detect Module — Auto-match module and load feature context from docs
5. Load Context — Read related module/feature docs within the 8-12K budget
6. Save Artifact — Persist to the canonical initiatives path 6.5. Discovery Interview — ONE interview: ask user question tool 4-6 structured questions (MANDATORY)
7. Validation Summary — derived from the interview answers, then ONE unconditional confirm ask user question tool on the revised problem statement / scope (MANDATORY)
8. Suggest Next — Point to /work-item --mode=refine for task creation

Key Rules:

• Output: initiatives/{YYMMDD}-{role}-initiative-{slug}.md under the team-artifacts root (default team-artifacts; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path)
• Validation NEVER optional — MANDATORY.
• Auto-detect module silently; prompt only when ambiguous or no match.
• MUST ATTENTION include t_shirt_size (XS/S/M/L/XL) in artifact for early sizing
• [BLOCKING] Tech-agnostic output (M1): Keep the problem statement tech-agnostic in all modes per spec-principles.md §3 in the reference-docs root (default docs/project-reference; a docsRoots.projectReference.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path); name no framework/product/language/design-pattern; defer stack preference to tech research.
• M3 Logical-ID Assignment (forward to task): Initiatives assign no logical IDs. When advanced via /work-item --mode=refine, the task assigns FR-/BR- IDs as the PRIMARY citation spine and carries [Source: namespace/service/id] abstract anchors separately from business-intent prose; never put physical code coordinates or repository-root paths in the initiative. Keep problem/value narrative free of source identifiers so the task inherits it cleanly.

Contents

• Quick Summary
• Greenfield Mode
• Detailed Workflow
• Output Formats
• Examples
• Next Steps
• Prompt-Enhance Closing Anchors
• Closing Reminders

Greenfield Mode

Auto-detected: No codebase means no discovered source directories, manifest files, or populated project-config.json; planning artifacts (docs/, plans/, .claude/) don't count. Require actual code directories with content.

Greenfield actions:

1. Skip module detection (no modules exist yet)
2. Skip project-structure-reference.md (won't exist)
3. Focus on market gap, competitors, differentiation
4. Keep problem statement tech-agnostic
5. Enable WebSearch for market/competitor context
6. Increase ask user question tool frequency — capture vision, constraints, team profile, scale expectations
7. [CRITICAL] NEVER ask about tech stack during initiative capture. Stack is a research-driven decision AFTER full business analysis (business-evaluation phase); acknowledge volunteered preferences, then defer to tech-stack research.

Detailed Workflow

Step 1: Gather Information

• No title → ask: "What's the idea in one sentence?" Ask: "What problem does this solve?" "Who benefits from this?" "Any initial scope thoughts?"

Step 2: Generate Artifact

• Template: .claude/docs/team-artifacts/templates/initiative-template.md (framework-owned path — NOT the configurable team-artifacts root in docs/project-config.json); ID: INITIATIVE-{YYMMDD}-{NNN} (the next number no existing record uses); intent: one sentence stating the outcome; status: draft.

Step 3: Capture Details

• Document problem statement, expected value, and target users.

Step 4: Detect Project Module

Dynamic Discovery:

1. Resolve modules and canonical artifact owners from config, required references and existing indexes. A valid native contract supplies its own owner/roles/identifiers; absent-profile strict defaults may use module/bucket READMEs and canonical README.*.md owners. Invalid/unresolved declarations stay BLOCKED. Match initiative intent to this discovered structure; a filename alone does not select a profile.

Scenario	Action
Clear match	Auto-detect — NEVER show confidence levels
Ambiguous / no match	Prompt: "Which project module?" + Glob results + "Cross-cutting/Infrastructure"
2+ modules detected	Load ALL modules, add all to related_features

If module detected:

1. Read the discovered module/index overview and relevant owner sections; use verified navigation to select the related capabilities. Do not require a module README or treat a preview as a complete required read.
2. Add frontmatter: module: {detected_module}, related_features: [Feature1, Feature2].

Step 5: Load Feature Context

1. Read the selected module/index overview and identify the closest capability owner(s).
2. Read relevant intent/contracts/evidence using the resolved profile; extract related concepts, rules and case identities. BR-/TC- are absent-profile examples, never a parallel namespace for native owners. Keep the context budget and explicit missing-owner gaps.

Token Budget: Target 8-12K tokens total.

Step 6: Save Artifact

• Path: initiatives/{YYMMDD}-{role}-initiative-{slug}.md under the team-artifacts root (default team-artifacts; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path); infer role from context or ask; include detected domain context.

Artifact Path (canonical convention) — Command /initiative → base path initiatives/ inside the team-artifacts root (default team-artifacts; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path), role token po, type initiative. Filename pattern: {YYMMDD}-{role}-{type}-{slug}.md → e.g. 260119-po-initiative-dark-mode-toggle.md. Slug = lowercased basename, non-alphanumeric → -, trimmed, max 50 chars.

• Work record hand-off: the saved file follows Records another skill authors. When taskTracking.mode is observe or linked, or the user asks for tracking, offer once to track it through /task-track --mode=maintain, handing over what the capture settled (its type, and a priority level, a due date or an area when the user stated one) for that section's hand-off to record; otherwise continue untracked. On an initiative that already has a tracking block, edit only the body and this skill's own keys. Capturing or validating an initiative never approves it: approval is a person's decision recorded through /task-track --mode=lifecycle.

Step 6.5: Discovery Interview (MANDATORY — the ONE interview)

Decision log: inside a workflow, read the run's ## Decisions first (/start-workflow → Step Execution Protocol, Decision log): ask only what it leaves open or new evidence reopened, cite reused answers instead of asking again, and append every new answer.

Apply the Decision Interview protocol: brief the user first on the drafted problem, value, users and scope, then ask. Use ask user question tool for 4-6 structured questions, a hard cap for this interview, batched into as few calls as the tool allows; each question MUST ATTENTION be a decision card with 2-4 options, what each option gives and costs, and one marked "(Recommended)" with its reason. Every category is asked AT MOST ONCE across this skill — there is no second question round on the same category. Ask a question only after the answers it depends on: a category that depends on an earlier answer goes in a later call.

Category	Purpose	Example
Problem Clarity	Distinguish problem from solution; confirm the statement is user-focused	"What problem does this solve?" + options
User Persona	Identify primary user	"Who benefits most?" + role options
Scope	MVP vs full vision; boundaries to settle now	"What's the smallest valuable version?"
Testability	Define done?	"How would you verify this works?"
Impact / Value	Business value sizing	"What value, and how many users/processes affected?"
Constraints	Known blockers	"Any technical/business constraints?"
Scale	Expected load/growth	"How many users/transactions expected?"
Stakeholders	Who else should review	"Who else should review this initiative?"

Greenfield: NEVER include tech-stack questions; focus on business problem, users, scale, constraints.

Testability Question (ALWAYS include): "How would you verify this feature works correctly?" — Options: manual test steps, automated test criteria, metric thresholds.

Document all answers under ## Discovery Interview, and list each category the cap left unasked as Not asked (/work-item --mode=refine reads this section and asks only the categories it leaves unanswered).

Step 7: Validation Summary (MANDATORY — derived summary + ONE confirm question, not a second interview)

Write ## Validation Summary from the Discovery Interview answers: the confirmed decisions and the follow-up action items, and update the artifact from them. Then ALWAYS ask ONE short ask user question tool ("Is the revised problem statement / scope right?") confirming it, whether or not the answers changed the Step 3 text; no other question is asked in this step.

Validation Output Format:

## Validation Summary

**Validated:** {date}

### Confirmed

- {decision}: {user choice}

### Action Items

- [ ] {follow-up if any}

Step 8: Suggest Next Step

After capture, use ask user question tool:

1. /work-item --mode=refine — Refine into task (Recommended)
2. /spec [mode=tests] — Jump straight to test spec
3. /plan — Start implementation planning

Output: "Initiative captured! To refine into a task, run: /work-item --mode=refine {filename}". If detected, add: "Module context from {module} will be used during refinement."

Output Formats

Domain Context Section

## Domain Context (Project Features)

### Module

{module_name}

### Related Features

- {Feature1} - [docs link]
- {Feature2} - [docs link]

### Domain Entities

- **Primary:** {Entity1}, {Entity2}
- **Related:** {Entity3}

### Existing Business Rules

- BR-{MOD}-XXX: {Brief description}

UI Sketch Section

## UI Sketch

### Layout

{Rough ASCII wireframe — see UI wireframe protocol}

### Key Components

- **{Component}** — {purpose} _(project owner/boundary; tier only when the project defines one)_

Search existing libs before proposing new components. Backend-only initiative: ## UI Sketch → N/A — Backend-only change. No UI affected.

Examples

Paths below show the default team-artifacts root; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides it.

/initiative "Dark mode toggle for settings"
# Creates: <team-artifacts root>/initiatives/260119-po-initiative-dark-mode-toggle.md

/initiative "Add goal progress tracking notification"
# Creates with module context: <team-artifacts root>/initiatives/260119-po-initiative-goal-progress-notification.md

---

Next Steps

Inside a workflow: when this skill runs as a step of an active workflow, skip the prompts in this section and return the result — the workflow's next step decides what runs (/start-workflow → Step Execution Protocol, Workflow-step mode).

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS After completion, use ask user question tool:

• "/work-item --mode=refine (Recommended)" — Transform initiative into actionable task
• "/web-research" — Initiative needs market research first
• "Skip, continue manually" — user decides

---

[IMPORTANT] Before starting, use TaskCreate for small tasks. Keep task depth proportional to the work.

External Memory: For complex/lengthy research, analysis, scans, or reviews, write intermediate findings to tmp/reports/ — prevents context loss and preserves a deliverable.

Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — every claim, finding, or recommendation needs file:line proof or traced evidence; confidence >80% acts, <80% verifies first.

<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:START -->

Protocol guides — Apply each protocol only when its read-when condition holds. If a protocol's text is not in your context, read its file below before you act on it.

• decision-interview — Brief the user, then ask every material decision as a decision card in dependency-ordered rounds; asking the user to confirm, choose or validate decisions → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/decision-interview.md
• sequential-thinking-protocol — Structured multi-step reasoning with revision, branch and hypothesis markers; planning, debugging or reviewing complex or ambiguous work → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/sequential-thinking-protocol.md
• ui-wireframe — Wireframe from the design inputs using the project's component owners; sketching a user interface → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/ui-wireframe.md

<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:END --> <!-- SYNC:decision-interview:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION interview: look up facts yourself · brief before the first question · ask every material decision the hosting skill's budget allows, in dependency order, as a decision card (options with gains and costs, a reasoned recommendation) · never pad or self-answer · play answers back and record unasked decisions as unconfirmed.

<!-- /SYNC:decision-interview:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:sequential-thinking-protocol:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION use structured reasoning for complex or ambiguous work, implicitly when visible markers would clutter. Verify hypotheses, revise assumptions, and close with confidence, assumptions, open questions and a concrete next action.

<!-- /SYNC:sequential-thinking-protocol:reminder --> <!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-CLOSING:START -->

Prompt-Enhance Closing Anchors

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Run declared steps in order; NEVER skip, reorder, or merge without explicit user approval. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Set task in_progress before each step/sub-skill; set completed after. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Completed steps need concise evidence; skipped steps need explicit reasons. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION If Task tools unavailable, maintain an equivalent synchronized tracker.

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-CLOSING:END -->

Closing Reminders

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal: Turn a vague product idea into a validated, tech-agnostic, module-anchored initiative artifact ready for /work-item --mode=refine to convert into a task — preserving problem intent without leaking solution or stack choices.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — Main steps (run in order, NEVER skip/reorder): (1) Gather info; (2) Generate artifact INITIATIVE-{YYMMDD}-{NNN} draft from initiative-template.md; (3) Capture problem/value/users; (4) Detect module through project structure and selected-profile canonical indexes/owners; (5) Load feature context (8-12K budget); (6) Save to canonical path; (6.5) Discovery Interview (ONE interview, ask user question tool 4-6); (7) Validation Summary derived from its answers + ONE confirm ask user question tool; (8) Suggest next → /work-item --mode=refine. — why: AI keeps dropping the skill's own mid-pipeline steps; the interview and module detection are the most-forgotten.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Mode gate: existing codebase → detect module and load context; Greenfield → skip module and structure reads, use market/WebSearch context, ask business questions more often, and NEVER ask about tech stack.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):

• UI Wireframe: for UI-bearing initiatives, use project ownership/observed boundaries; search existing components and reuse only when behavior/platform contracts fit. Backend-only is N/A.
• AI-SDD M1–M3: Keep initiative prose tech-agnostic business intent; defer logical IDs and [Source: ...] carriers to the downstream task.
• Sequential Thinking: multi-step Thought N/M with REVISION/BRANCH/HYPOTHESIS markers and confidence closer.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Discovery Interview (Step 6.5) + Validation Summary (Step 7) NEVER optional — run the ONE ask user question tool interview and the ONE Step 7 confirm question even for "simple" initiatives and never re-ask a category — why: discovery uncovers hidden constraints and confirms problem framing, and a repeated question burns the PO's time. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION ALWAYS keep problem statement tech-agnostic (M1, spec-principles.md §3, all modes) — name no framework/product/language/design-pattern; defer any stack preference to the later tech-research phase — why: task inherits the narrative cleanly downstream IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION in greenfield mode NEVER ask about tech stack — acknowledge a volunteered preference, then defer to the business-evaluation phase — why: stack is a research-driven decision after business analysis, not a capture-time guess IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION TaskCreate break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including a task to READ project-structure-reference.md (skip in greenfield — it won't exist) IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate all decisions with user via ask user question tool — NEVER auto-decide — and NEVER show confidence levels on an auto-detected module match IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION auto-detect module from the evidenced project structure and selected artifact owners/indexes — prompt only when ambiguous or no match; greenfield → skip module detection — why: confirm with Glob() evidence, not assumption IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION assign NO logical IDs (M3) — an initiative is tech-agnostic business intent only; the downstream task owns FR-/BR- assignment and [Source: namespace/service/id] anchors — why: keep the problem/value narrative free of source identifiers so the task inherits it cleanly IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION include t_shirt_size (XS/S/M/L/XL) in the artifact and keep the feature-context load within the 8-12K token budget — why: early sizing feeds prioritization; over-budget reads dilute attention IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION persist to initiatives/{YYMMDD}-{role}-initiative-{slug}.md under the team-artifacts root (default team-artifacts; a docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path), then hand off to /work-item --mode=refine for task conversion — why: canonical path keeps downstream tooling aligned IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION the initiative file is a work record owned by /task-track: unused id, status: draft, no assignee, no decision or priority key of this skill's own; approval, type, priority level and due date are recorded only through /task-track, and on a tracked initiative so are title/intent/status/priority — why: a second status vocabulary makes the tracker refuse the record IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION on UI-bearing initiatives, search existing components and reuse when behavior/platform contracts fit; classify by project ownership/observed boundaries. A visual percentage does not establish compatibility; backend-only work is N/A. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line proof or traced evidence for every claim/recommendation, confidence >80% to act, <80% verify first — why: certainty without evidence is the root of hallucination IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review task to verify work quality

Anti-Rationalization:

Evasion	Rebuttal
"Initiative is simple, skip interview"	NEVER skip — discovery uncovers hidden constraints
"Module is obvious, skip detection"	Still run Glob() — confirm with evidence not assumption
"Validation is redundant after interview"	ALWAYS run both — the confirm question checks the derived problem statement / scope, not a new category
"Greenfield check is optional"	Auto-detect is MANDATORY — no manual override
"User mentioned a framework, capture it"	Stay tech-agnostic — acknowledge, defer to tech-research phase
"I'll assign FR-/BR- IDs now"	NO logical IDs at initiative stage — the task assigns them downstream
"Reuse an existing component? new is faster"	For UI, search existing components and verify behavior/platform fit before proposing a new owner; use the project’s taxonomy

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION the 3 rules to never skip: (1) run BOTH Discovery + Validation ask user question tool gates; (2) keep the problem statement tech-agnostic (no stack/IDs); (3) cite file:line evidence, confidence >80% to act.