本文へ移動
cccskills
GitHub Copilot 公式無料GitHub で公開

brief

Turns a short intent, often around 20 words, into a brief that can run unattended. The brief has the user's words verbatim, an outcome owner, an observable done-when, a feedback loop, constraints and neighbors, a budget, an autonomy level, an absence window, stop conditions and a report contract. Runs only on `/lever brief`, when another lever skill delegates, or on an explicit request to write a brief or hand work off ("kick off", "spin up", "hand this to", "while I'm asleep", "I'll be away"). It files issues, so it never runs just because work is happening in parallel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/leverスター 49(GitHub 49 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitHub

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md11.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Brief

The person with the intent should write a short sentence, and the agent should do the structuring. Experts type short kickoffs. What makes their delegation work is the brief compiled from that sentence. It says what done looks like, how the worker will know it is working, what it must not touch, how long it has, who lands the result and what to do while nobody is watching. This skill compiles that brief into templates/brief.md. It explores the repo to fill fields instead of asking the human.

When to use

  • Handing work to anything that will run without you watching: a child session, a background agent, a coding agent on an issue, a scheduled run, or an automation prompt.
  • Fanning out the same intent across N sessions, slices, models or hypotheses.
  • Any kickoff longer than one sentence that will run for more than about 30 minutes.

Do not use it for a quick interactive edit you will watch, or when a brief for this work already exists. Amend the existing brief instead of writing a second one.

Steps

  1. Quote the ask verbatim under ## Ask (verbatim). Keep typos and casing. Never paraphrase the only copy. When briefs pass through several agents, the quote is what stops intent from drifting.

  2. Explore before asking. Read the code, open issues and PRs, CI and existing instruments. Write down what the code actually supports today as a baseline line. Fill every field you can from the repo. The question budget defaults to 0. If one field truly needs the human, ask a single question that covers all of it.

  3. Outcome and owner. Write one line for the outcome, and name the person or team who cares about the result. Name one owner per outcome. If ownership is split, write two briefs.

  4. Done-when you can observe. State it as checks someone other than the author can run: a test passes, CI is green on the final commit, a metric crosses a threshold, or a screenshot or video shows a specific state. Name the evidence level that counts as done. Merged is not the same as deployed or measured. "It works" is not a done-when.

  5. Feedback loop. If the work is iterative, run find-the-loop and link or summarize its Loop Card. If there is no baseline, the worker's first step is to measure one.

  6. Constraints and neighbors. List out-of-scope paths, read-only areas, real security limits, and the non-goals. Give every constraint a source and expiry, for example (source: operator, expires: end of task). A constraint with no source isn't real, so drop it. For neighbors, list other lanes, PRs, sessions or people touching the same files, so the worker coordinates instead of colliding.

  7. Budget. Take the spend tier and budget the router resolved (your tier, capped by the repo's budgets:), and which steps get a premium model. Set a timebox, a maximum number of iterations or attempts, a maximum PR size, and API and compute limits. For polling, use the minimum poll interval and API budget from .github/lever.yml budgets: when present. Also set the budget stop: what to do at 80% of the budget, which is to report and then finish or park.

  8. Autonomy level. Resolve it with autonomy-dial. Record the level, the ceiling and where the level came from. If the prompt doesn't say who lands the work, ask the one kickoff question from docs/autonomy.md once. Skip it if the ask already answers it ("then merge", "hand off to the owning team").

  9. Absence window and blocked policy. Say when the human is away, for example "no human until 09:00 PT". Pick a blocked policy:

    • decide-and-log: make the call and record the assumption;
    • park-and-next: set the item aside and take the next one;
    • ask-parent: escalate to the coordinating agent, never the human, while they are absent.

    Human-only questions are surfaced once, with a recommended answer, in the next report. Delivery beats planning: do not produce status or plans in place of work.

  10. Stop conditions. Write all three:

    • success: the done-when passes at the required evidence level;
    • give-up or re-plan: the budget is spent, or there has been no meaningful progress for the stuck threshold (default 2 h), in which case write a simpler plan, get a second-model critique and pick one;
    • escalate: the one decision only a human can make.
  11. Report contract. Name who receives reports, the cadence, and the format, following progress-contract and templates/status-digest.md. The default is silent unless something changed.

  12. Fan-out ("1 of N"). When there are several workers, write N sibling briefs that share the same Ask, rules, budget and report contract. Each brief adds a line You are 1 of N. Your slice: <area | model | hypothesis>. Siblings: <slices>. Slices must not overlap in the files they write. When comparing arms, every arm uses the same Loop Card.

  13. File it. The brief lives on a GitHub issue in the target repo, so any session can resume it (docs/tracking.md). Title it with the outcome. The body is the brief, then an empty ## Status section and the <!-- lever: … --> marker. Assign it to the outcome owner (usually the user) and label it lever, creating the label if it's missing. More than one lane: one sub-issue per lane with its "1 of N" brief, also labelled lever, linked to the parent with gh api repos/{o}/{r}/issues/{n}/sub_issues -F sub_issue_id=$(gh api repos/{o}/{r}/issues/{child} --jq .id) (the child's id, not its number). Search label:lever first and amend an existing brief for the same outcome instead of filing a second one. No triage permission, or someone else's repo the user hasn't said to file in: keep the brief in the session and say so.

  14. Pick the runner. Use brief.runner from ~/.copilot/lever.yml if set. Otherwise end with one choice: here (this session coordinates now), cloud (assign each lane sub-issue to Copilot) or later (filed, nobody runs it yet). Then:

    • here: run /lever deliver #<issue> and keep it alive across turns: in the CLI, /goal <done-when> and /every 30m /lever deliver #<issue>; in the app, /goal and a session automation that runs /lever deliver #<issue> every 30 min. Each tick is a deliver sweep; /lever status stays read-only. Write runner=here and the coordinator into the marker.
    • cloud: assign each lane sub-issue to Copilot. Offer /lever automate for a paused Copilot Automation that shepherds the resulting PRs at the resolved autonomy level.
    • later: stop. Print /lever deliver #<issue> as the command to run when ready.

    In interactive mode, show the brief once before filing. In autopilot, file it and go.

Example (abridged)

Ask (verbatim): "ci on the app is way too slow. make it faster, I'm offline till morning. measured by wall clock"

The brief this produces:

  • Outcome: PR time-to-green on the critical path. Owner: the app's maintainers.
  • Done when: p50 TTG improves above the A/A floor across ≥6 paired runs. Evidence level: measured.
  • Loop: the Loop Card from find-the-loop (CI row), with a baseline as the first step.
  • Constraints:
    • Don't widen workflow permissions: (source: repo policy).
    • Don't touch release/** (source: operator, expires: end of task).
    • Neighbors: an open PR touching the caching steps.
  • Budget: 10 h. At most 10 parallel arms. 75 API calls per merged PR.
  • Autonomy: L1 do-not-merge arms, and winners handed off at L2 (ceiling L2: CODEOWNERS required). Absence window until 09:00 PT, decide-and-log.
  • Stop:
    • Success: keep bar met.
    • Give up: 3 consecutive rejects per layer, or the budget is spent.
    • Escalate: none expected.
  • Report: a morning digest, silent overnight unless something lands.

Dials

DialDefaultOptions
Question budget0. Explore, then ask one batched question only if blocked1–3 questions; full interview
Brief lengthFull templateTerse: Ask, done-when, autonomy, stop
Autonomy levelResolved by autonomy-dialL0–L5
Blocked policydecide-and-logpark-and-next; ask-parent; ask-human (only when present)
Absence windowAsked once if the user signals absenceNone; fixed hours; "until done"
Stuck threshold2 h without meaningful progress → re-plan30 min – 8 h
Budget stopReport at 80%, then finish or park50–100%
Fan-out1N copies sliced by area, model or hypothesis
Report target and cadenceBack to the delegator, on changeHourly; milestones; daily digest; issue comment
ApprovalInteractive: show before filing. Autopilot: file and goAlways show; never show
Where it livesAn issue assigned to the owner, label lever; sub-issues per laneSession only (no issue)
Runnerbrief.runner, else ask oncehere; cloud; later

Outputs

An issue labelled lever and assigned to the owner, with a filled templates/brief.md in its body and one sub-issue per lane. Sibling briefs share one Ask, and each carries its own "1 of N" line. A one-line summary goes back to the user: #<issue> · <N> lane(s) · <outcome> · done when <check> · L<n> · runner <here|cloud|later>.

This skill's own feedback loop

  • Metric: steering messages per delegated task, and the first-pass rate to done-when. Both should improve.
  • Retro: when a worker asks a question, stalls, gets steered, or reports "done" and is wrong, name the brief field that was missing or vague. Append a gap line to the brief, and adjust this skill's defaults once the same gap appears three times.
  • Field coverage: track how often each field is filled. Stop conditions are usually the weakest field, so check them first.

Failure modes it prevents

  • Intent drift when a paraphrase of a paraphrase reaches the third agent.
  • "Done" that means "I stopped". Unobservable done-whens.
  • Workers interrogating the human about things exploration could answer.
  • Collisions with neighboring work. Constraints with no source that pile up and never expire.
  • Overnight runs that stop at the first question nobody is awake to answer.
  • Unbounded polling and API burn.

Why this exists

  • Across ~1.8k sessions, one developer's own kickoffs had a median of 18 words. Briefs that agents wrote for other agents had a median of 423. Across 418 pairs, the median expansion was 10.5×. The skill is in the compiling, not in long prompts.
  • Over nine months, the share of kickoff briefs with acceptance criteria rose from 0% to 43%. Explicit stop conditions remained the weakest field at 14%.
  • 67% of agent-written briefs carried the user's words verbatim, which kept intent stable across chains of agents.
  • Plans with a baseline and a metric shipped. A +105k-line rewrite with an 8-phase dependency graph and no incremental loop stalled.
  • Same-prompt fan-out worked as a method: "you are 1 of 20 parallel triage sessions" across a public issue tracker.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

automate-it

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Turns a task you keep doing by hand into a paused GitHub Copilot Automation with an event trigger, a least-privilege tool list, a PARAMETERS + CONTRACT prompt, a quiet exit and a propose-only improver sibling. It creates automations, so it runs only on `/lever automate` or an explicit ask ("automate this", "run this on every PR/issue", "do this nightly", "make this run in the cloud"). When the same task has been done 3 or more times by hand, or a local self-wake has fired 5 or more times for the same job, suggest it in one line instead of running it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

autonomous-delivery

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Runs long-lived delivery as a coordinator with parallel lanes. Sets authority and pacing dials up front, keeps lanes alive and fed, lands work through a single-writer release train, and reports status only when something changed. Runs only on `/lever deliver`, "/autonomous-delivery" or an explicit request to run multi-hour, overnight or multi-lane delivery ("run this overnight", "keep N streams going", "don't stop until it ships"), or to re-arm an existing run after a restart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

autonomy-dial

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Resolves how far an agent may take a change, from L0 propose to L5 release. It reads the repo's real GitHub rules (rulesets, branch protection, CODEOWNERS, merge queue) and `.github/lever.yml`, applies per-path and per-class limits, records every grant verbatim with its source and expiry, and exposes a `may_merge` check that delivery skills call before landing anything. Use when a delivery skill or automation starts, when creating an automation, before any merge or enqueue, or when the user says "merge", "ship it", "land it", "then merge", "hand off", "do not merge", "freeze" or "you can merge X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

cross-model-review

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Reviews a PR, diff, plan or skill with 2–3 models from different providers working blind and independently, and surfaces only the findings they agree on or that survive a contradiction-first proof; a precision mode runs one automated reviewer that posts at most two proven findings and stays silent otherwise. Use when asked to "review this with opus, codex and gemini", "rubber duck this plan", "second opinion", "only show me issues the models agree on", when a plan is about to drive a day or more of work, when work has been stuck for hours, or when setting up review-on-ready automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

experiment-arms

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Runs many single-hypothesis "arms" as do-not-merge PRs, measures each with paired, interleaved runs against a cost-matched control, keeps only the arms that clear a keep bar set in advance, records every negative, and composes the winners into a stack that is re-measured on real traffic after merge. It opens PRs and burns CI, so it runs only on `/lever arms` or an explicit ask to measure ideas ("which of these ideas actually helps?", "is this change worth it?", "try that tip I saw", "run arms on this") for a CI, perf, eval, benchmark or cost hill-climb where the system can be run on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

find-the-loop

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Before iterating on a speedup or quality problem, build the feedback loop first and write it down as a Loop Card that names the outcome, the instrument the agent runs itself, the noise floor, the keep bar and the stop rule. Use on `/lever loop`, when asked to speed up, optimize, hill-climb or "make X better" against something measurable, and when a loop smell shows up mid-task: the user has pasted two or more screenshots or numbers, "still broken" has come up twice, the agent said "please try it" without running it, someone claims a win from one run, or the human is acting as the instrument. Not for one-shot fixes that existing tests already prove.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/lever492026年10月29日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する