本文へ移動
cccskills
GitHub Copilot 公式無料GitHub で公開

browser-canvas-validation

Use the Copilot browser canvas first for rendered route checks, interaction tests, screenshots and visual, responsive or accessibility evidence. Use configured isolated Playwright MCP only when the canvas is unavailable for a required check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replicaスター 29(GitHub 29 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールPlaywright

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • WORKFLOW.md9.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Browser canvas validation

Canvas inspection requires a Copilot host exposing the browser canvas. It is not a universal browser API. A repository-configured isolated Playwright MCP fallback can cover authorized checks only when the canvas is unavailable for that check. This policy also governs browser evidence gathered by other skills and agent work. Existing automated suites and CI/capture drivers remain unchanged. Default to read-only validation of the requested outcome. A validation request does not authorize source fixes, commits, publishing or real application mutations. Use approved test state and confirm side effects before submissions, deletion, messages or changes to authentication.

Required reads and dependencies

Read context resolution and the complete workflow before driving a page. Install product-design for the shared resolver and scenario policy. The optional agent-browser fallback is needed only for an explicit CLI-only request or a named requirement neither the canvas nor configured MCP fallback can meet, not for ordinary checks. If a required companion or sibling skill is missing, stop and name its path before checks. Do not auto-install dependencies.

Select the first existing root, .agents/context/, then .github/contexts/. Read the applicable BROWSER-VALIDATION.md sections and owner topics for target/readiness, canvas identifiers, safe state and recovery. In the shared template, these are Target and readiness, Canvas host and identifiers, Sessions, safe state and artifacts, and Recovery and cleanup. Read Configured Playwright MCP fallback or Existing CLI adapter only when that fallback is needed.

Read the applicable REPOSITORY.md section for the target (Where UI lives in the shared template), Commands when a command is needed, and Constraints for relevant permissions or lifecycle. Follow applicable owner links. If a consumer uses different headings, select the equivalent sections by owner rather than reading the entire file.

Read PRODUCT-DESIGN.md when expected product behavior is unresolved, when assessing scenario behavior or fidelity, or when checking forms, persistence, destructive actions or externally visible changes. A fully specified, read-only route or menu check can use the request as its expected outcome. Read DESIGN-SYSTEM.md for component-specific assertions, ACCESSIBILITY.md for accessibility checks and RESPONSIVE-DESIGN.md for responsive checks. No manifest or canvas-specific pack file is required. Never mix roots.

Missing required context stops validation. Report the selected root/file and offer setup-skills to author or refresh context under the shared resolution rules. Do not invoke it automatically. Never read drafts as active context. Follow relevant owner links and evidence anchors, preserve proposed-default labels and disclose conflicts. Read the complete applicable owner sections, not unrelated sections or topics. Product context owns scenarios and state policy. Browser context owns target URL, server, routes and recovery.

Use only permitted sources. Do not research remotely or broaden exclusions during validation. Request explicit refresh if required documentation is stale or missing. A document with gaps does not prove runtime capabilities.

Runtime contract

Do not discover canvas capabilities for source-only tasks. For rendered checks, identify the browser canvas and inspect its actual schemas before the first required operation. Reuse a schema already discovered for the same provider in this session. Rediscover only after provider reload/reconnect, a schema mismatch or an explicit request to check for changed capabilities; a timeout alone does not invalidate it. Never carry schemas across providers or sessions.

If the browser canvas or required tools are absent, report the blocker and use only the explicit configured MCP handoff in WORKFLOW.md when applicable. Use the advertised open input and action schemas; no frozen action list overrides the runtime.

Keep the canvas type and caller-chosen instanceId handle distinct. Address the panel with that handle through invoke_canvas_action. If the advertised action needs no separate page identifier, call it directly; do not wait for a page-acquisition tool. Reuse a context-declared session handle when appropriate. Only when an action schema requires a separate page identifier, obtain it from runtime results or an explicit supported host contract. If discovery and returned identifiers cannot satisfy an action schema, report the mismatch and stop rather than inventing a value or an unavailable tool. Missing required page acquisition may use the same explicit MCP handoff; it is not an action failure or permission to infer IDs. A missing action can use that handoff for the affected assertion only; keep supported checks in the canvas.

Open/reuse once, read fresh rendered structure, assert the target rendered, then act using observed elements and advertised actions. Re-read after DOM changes, navigation or reload before using refs. Do not assume a click returns a snapshot or that scoped reads/batching exist. Details and recovery are in WORKFLOW.md.

Output

Report target, context document paths, runtime, tested state/flow, assertions and evidence. Separate confirmed failures from unavailable or untested assertions. An overall pass requires every applicable requested assertion to be verified. No render, missing evidence or unavailable runtime means failed or incomplete validation. Static checks do not prove live browser behavior. Do not automatically run broader design, accessibility, responsive or cross-browser audits.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

accessibility-audit

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Audits actual components and routes against applicable WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria using consumer-owned design-system evidence and repository tools. Use when asked for an accessibility audit, a11y check, keyboard or focus review, contrast check, or screen-reader verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

add-seed-data

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Creates or updates believable deterministic raw fixture scenarios without breaking an existing prototype. Use when asked to add or change fixtures, seed data, sample data, scenarios, or cross-record relationships. Not for UI redesign, live-data infrastructure, or unrelated commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

agent-browser

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Use for explicit agent-browser CLI checks or a named browser capability neither the Copilot canvas nor configured Playwright MCP can supply. Ordinary rendered checks and browser selection belong to browser-canvas-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

code-review

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Review Replica pull requests using the same shared conventions and project guides as implementation agents. Use when reviewing changes to code, tests, workflows, or documentation in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

component-design-system-review

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Reviews existing UI components for design-system consistency, states, responsiveness and accessibility using consumer-owned context. Use when asked to review component quality, check design-system adherence or audit component consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

context-templates

GitHub Copilot 公式無料

Shared context template library for setup-skills. Read when discovering context documents or their ownership. This library supplies research inputs, not active product context or a separate authoring workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica292026年10月27日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する