複数の独立したローカル作業を安全性と依存関係を確認して実行計画にまとめ、対応環境では並列化やAppleシリコン向け処理の選択を支援します。
- ビルドやテストの独立した処理を並列化したいとき
- 複数段階の作業計画を安全に実行したいとき
- Appleシリコン向け処理の候補を確認したいとき
OpenSpecの変更について、実装に必要な計画成果物を依存関係に沿ってまとめて作成し、実装を始められる状態に整えるスキルです。
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually. Also use when the user says "openspec ff" or "opsx ff".
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るOpenSpecの変更について、実装開始に必要な成果物を依存関係に沿って作成します。変更名または作りたいものの説明を受け取り、変更用のディレクトリを作成したうえで、必要な成果物と作成順を確認します。各成果物の作成前には指示や関連ファイルを読み、対象プロジェクトの実装、テスト、設定、ドキュメントを調べて内容を具体化します。作成後は状態を再確認し、実装に必要な成果物がそろうまで進めます。
一つずつ成果物の作成を依頼せず、OpenSpecの計画をまとめて整えたいときに向いています。機能追加や修正の説明から、既存コードを踏まえた計画資料を用意したい場合にも使えます。必要な内容が曖昧なときは、作業を始める前に確認します。
OpenSpec CLIが必要です。OpenSpecを導入済みのプロジェクト、または登録済みストアを対象にします。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.
One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.
Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:
openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).
IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"
This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for contextcontext and rules first, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, configuration, and documentation outside openspec/. Keep inspection read-only and proportional to the change; reuse findings for later artifacts and inspect more only as needed.
resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose a concrete path inside changeRoot that matches the glob, and verify it remains inside changeRoot after resolving symlinks, both in its parent directories and in the file itself if it already exists; if it does not, stop and tell the user. Otherwise the output path is resolvedOutputPathinstruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path; otherwise stop and tell the user. Then verify the artifact file exists at that output pathtemplate as the structure and write it to that output pathcontext and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the fileb. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires)
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonapplyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alonestatus is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends onstatus: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create onestatus already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider itblocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anywaydone, skipped, or was deliberately skippedc. If an artifact requires user input (critically unclear context):
Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
/openspec-apply-change or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."Artifact Creation Guidelines
instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact namesinstruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - but only once you have chosen and checked the output path, and only if it can write theretemplate as the structure for your output file - fill in its sectionscontext and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
<context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifactGuardrails
apply.requiresまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
複数の独立したローカル作業を安全性と依存関係を確認して実行計画にまとめ、対応環境では並列化やAppleシリコン向け処理の選択を支援します。
将来の読み手が理由を知りたくなる未決定や暫定対応を、技術的負債として登録し、後から項目ごとに整理できるスキルです。
LangChain、EINO、AutoGen、AgentScope、CrewAI向けのコード雛形やAPI対応、プロジェクト構成を参照し、バージョン確認を踏まえてAIエージェント開発を支援します。
エラーやテスト失敗、画面の異常などを再現して原因を特定し、テストで確認しながら影響を絞った修正を進めるデバッグ用スキルです。
対話を通じてAI Agentの要件整理から設計、ツール定義、コード生成、動作確認まで6段階で進め、実行可能なプロジェクトを作ります。
プロジェクトの範囲拡大や作業の分岐、命名・設計の不整合を読み取り専用で点検し、根拠と深刻度を添えた診断や、続行・分割・一時停止などの判断材料を報告します。