本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開日本語紹介

openspec-ff-change

OpenSpecの変更について、実装に必要な計画成果物を依存関係に沿ってまとめて作成し、実装を始められる状態に整えるスキルです。

原文原文の説明を見る

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually. Also use when the user says "openspec ff" or "opsx ff".

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsスター 1,422(GitHub 1,422 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

こんなときに便利

  • 変更の計画成果物をまとめて作りたいとき
  • 機能説明から実装計画を整えたいとき
  • 既存コードを踏まえて変更を準備したいとき

日本語での紹介

できること

OpenSpecの変更について、実装開始に必要な成果物を依存関係に沿って作成します。変更名または作りたいものの説明を受け取り、変更用のディレクトリを作成したうえで、必要な成果物と作成順を確認します。各成果物の作成前には指示や関連ファイルを読み、対象プロジェクトの実装、テスト、設定、ドキュメントを調べて内容を具体化します。作成後は状態を再確認し、実装に必要な成果物がそろうまで進めます。

こんなときに便利

一つずつ成果物の作成を依頼せず、OpenSpecの計画をまとめて整えたいときに向いています。機能追加や修正の説明から、既存コードを踏まえた計画資料を用意したい場合にも使えます。必要な内容が曖昧なときは、作業を始める前に確認します。

使い方の例

  • 「ユーザー認証を追加する変更の計画をまとめて作って」
  • 「openspec ff」
  • 「決済画面の入力チェックを改善する変更を準備して」

注意点

OpenSpec CLIが必要です。OpenSpecを導入済みのプロジェクト、または登録済みストアを対象にします。

この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md11.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.

One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.

Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:

  • Auto-selected: you chose this workflow yourself, without the user naming OpenSpec, naming this skill, or running its slash command. Stop using OpenSpec and answer the request normally, as you would with no OpenSpec installed. Do not ask them to set anything up and do not mention OpenSpec setup.
  • Explicit OpenSpec request: the user named OpenSpec, named this skill, or ran its slash command. Stop before writing and ask how to proceed: set this project up (openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.

In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

    Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

  2. Create the change directory

    openspec new change "<name>"
    

    This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.

  3. Get the artifact build order

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to get:

    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
  4. Create every artifact in the required set

    Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

    Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

    a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

    • Get instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
      
    • The instructions JSON includes:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
      • skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
      • resolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
    • Inspect the relevant project before drafting: Read context and rules first, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, configuration, and documentation outside openspec/. Keep inspection read-only and proportional to the change; reuse findings for later artifacts and inspect more only as needed.
      • Identify the target project from the request and project context; the planning home may be separate from the code. If the target is unclear, ask. For greenfield or non-code changes, inspect the available structure and relevant documents. If source is unavailable, state the limitation and ask when it materially affects the plan.
      • Ground scope, approach, and tasks in what you find. Distinguish observed behavior from assumptions and proposed additions; surface conflicts with existing specs instead of silently deciding which is correct.
      • Do this discovery now, rather than leaving generic "explore the codebase" or "make a plan" tasks for implementation. Keep any necessary follow-up investigation specific to an unresolved question.
    • Choose the output path before creating anything. If resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose a concrete path inside changeRoot that matches the glob, and verify it remains inside changeRoot after resolving symlinks, both in its parent directories and in the file itself if it already exists; if it does not, stop and tell the user. Otherwise the output path is resolvedOutputPath
    • If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path; otherwise stop and tell the user. Then verify the artifact file exists at that output path
    • Otherwise create the artifact file using template as the structure and write it to that output path
    • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
    • Show brief progress: "✓ Created <artifact-id>"

    b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires)

    • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    • The required set is applyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
    • status is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends on
    • An artifact already reading status: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
    • Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
    • Skip one only when status already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
    • Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still blocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
    • Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

    c. If an artifact requires user input (critically unclear context):

    • Ask the user to clarify
    • Then continue with creation
  5. Show final status

    openspec status --change "<name>"
    

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

  • Change name and location
  • List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
  • What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
  • Prompt: "Run /openspec-apply-change or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

  • Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
  • If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - but only once you have chosen and checked the output path, and only if it can write there
  • The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
  • Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
  • Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

  • Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
  • If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
  • If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
  • Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

accelerate-local-work

無料概要あり

複数の独立したローカル作業を安全性と依存関係を確認して実行計画にまとめ、対応環境では並列化やAppleシリコン向け処理の選択を支援します。

  • ビルドやテストの独立した処理を並列化したいとき
  • 複数段階の作業計画を安全に実行したいとき
  • Appleシリコン向け処理の候補を確認したいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月27日 更新

add

無料概要あり

将来の読み手が理由を知りたくなる未決定や暫定対応を、技術的負債として登録し、後から項目ごとに整理できるスキルです。

  • 暫定対応を負債として記録したいとき
  • TODOや未完了作業を管理したいとき
  • 負債の影響箇所や解消条件を残したいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月28日 更新

adk-framework-adapters

無料概要あり

LangChain、EINO、AutoGen、AgentScope、CrewAI向けのコード雛形やAPI対応、プロジェクト構成を参照し、バージョン確認を踏まえてAIエージェント開発を支援します。

  • 指定したフレームワークで雛形を作りたいとき
  • 複数のエージェントフレームワークを比較したいとき
  • ツール定義やメモリ設定の例を参照したいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月26日 更新

agent-debug-fixer

無料概要あり

エラーやテスト失敗、画面の異常などを再現して原因を特定し、テストで確認しながら影響を絞った修正を進めるデバッグ用スキルです。

  • テスト失敗の根本原因を調べたいとき
  • 画面や機能の不具合を小さく修正したいとき
  • 再発防止のテストを先に用意したいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月28日 更新

agent-dev-workshop

無料概要あり

対話を通じてAI Agentの要件整理から設計、ツール定義、コード生成、動作確認まで6段階で進め、実行可能なプロジェクトを作ります。

  • Agentの要件と設計を整理したいとき
  • 実行可能なAgentの試作品を作りたいとき
  • ツールやPromptの構成を決めたいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月26日 更新

agent-drift-auditor

無料概要あり

プロジェクトの範囲拡大や作業の分岐、命名・設計の不整合を読み取り専用で点検し、根拠と深刻度を添えた診断や、続行・分割・一時停止などの判断材料を報告します。

  • 作業が当初の範囲からずれていないか調べたいとき
  • 複数の計画や設計の食い違いを見つけたいとき
  • 変更せずにコードと決定事項を点検したいとき
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,4222026年10月28日 更新

hashgraph-online のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する