本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

geo-optimizer

Optimize existing blog posts and web content for GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — AI search visibility on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Use whenever a user provides a blog URL or pastes existing content and asks to optimize it for AI search, rewrite for LLM visibility, improve GEO score, make content answer-first, add FAQ sections, restructure headings for AI retrieval, improve citation potential, or audit content for AI readiness. Also triggers on "GEO optimize this", "make this AI-search ready", "rewrite for Perplexity", "optimize for ChatGPT", "optimize for Google AI Overviews", "improve AI visibility", "reformat for AI search", "make this content citation-worthy", "content isn't showing up in AI search", "why isn't my blog cited by AI", "GEO audit", "answer-first rewrite", "restructure for AI", "make my blog AI-friendly", "improve LLM citability". Do NOT trigger for writing new content from scratch — use geo-content for that.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

GEO Optimizer

Analyze and rewrite existing content to maximize visibility, citability, and retrieval by AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews).

Always produce two outputs:

  1. HTML report — GEO audit with before/after score, issue breakdown, and annotated changes
  2. DOCX — clean, ready-to-publish rewritten article

Step 1: Detect Input Mode

URL mode — User provides a link. Use web_fetch to retrieve the page. Extract: title, meta description, H1, all headings (H2/H3), body text, existing FAQs, and any schema present.

Paste mode — User pastes raw content. Use as-is. Infer target query from the H1 or opening paragraph.

If neither is provided, ask: "Please share the blog URL or paste the content you'd like to GEO optimize."

If web_fetch fails (gated page, login wall, etc.), tell the user and ask them to paste the content instead.


Step 2: Identify the Primary Target Query

Before auditing or rewriting, determine:

  • What one core question should this post answer?
  • Is the H1 query-shaped (sounds like something a real person would search)?
  • Does the opening paragraph answer it directly?

State the primary target query explicitly. This drives all rewriting decisions.


Step 3: GEO Audit — Score the Original

Score the original content across 5 dimensions (20 points each, 100 total).

1. Answer-First Structure (0–20)

  • Do the opening 2–3 sentences directly answer the primary query?
  • Is the key insight stated upfront, not buried in the conclusion?
  • Deduct for preamble, background-first intros, or "In this article, we will…" openers.

2. Heading Quality (0–20)

  • Are H2/H3s query-shaped — do they sound like something searchable?
  • Do headings make sense read out of context (as an AI would extract them)?
  • Deduct for vague headings like "Introduction", "Overview", or "More Details".

3. Chunkability & Section Independence (0–20)

  • Can each section be understood without reading the rest of the article?
  • Are self-referential phrases absent ("as mentioned above", "as we'll see below")?
  • Are paragraphs short and purposeful (3–4 lines max)?

4. Citation Signals (0–20)

  • Are specific statistics, data points, or named sources present?
  • Are claims concrete and attributable rather than vague ("studies show", "experts say")?
  • Are definitions, numbered steps, or comparison tables present?

5. FAQ & Structured Formats (0–20)

  • Is there a FAQ section written in realistic search-language questions?
  • Are tables used for comparisons or criteria where applicable?
  • Are there definition blocks or quotable summary statements?

Compute and record the GEO Score Before: X/100 with per-dimension breakdown.


Step 4: Rewrite the Content

Apply all of the following in order:

4a. Rewrite the Opening (Answer-First)

Lead with a direct, quotable answer to the primary target query in the first sentence. Follow with 1–2 sentences of supporting context. Remove any preamble, hook, or "by the end of this article…" language entirely.

4b. Rewrite All Headings

Rephrase every H2 and H3 to be query-shaped and self-explanatory when read out of context.

  • Before: "Benefits of X" → After: "What Are the Main Benefits of X?"
  • Before: "Our Approach" → After: "How Does [Topic] Work in Practice?"
  • Before: "Introduction" → After: Remove or replace with the actual topic

4c. Rewrite Each Section for Chunkability

  • Remove self-referential phrases
  • Break any paragraph longer than 4 lines into shorter units
  • Make the first sentence of each section a mini-answer for that section's heading

4d. Strengthen Citation Signals

  • Replace vague claims with specific statistics or named sources. If the original has none, infer credible sources that fit (e.g. "According to a 2024 Gartner report…") and flag these clearly as suggested additions for the writer to verify.
  • Add a definition block for the core concept if one is missing
  • Add a comparison table if the content compares tools, methods, or options

4e. Add or Improve FAQ Section

Write 5–7 FAQ questions in real search language (the kind a person types into Google or Perplexity). Each answer: 2–4 sentences, direct, self-contained, quotable. Place the FAQ near the bottom of the article.

4f. Suggest Meta Optimization

Always produce:

  • Slug: short, keyword-first, hyphenated
  • SEO Title: query match, under 60 characters
  • Meta Description: spoils the answer, 150–160 characters
  • H1: slightly more descriptive than the slug, still query-shaped

Step 5: Re-Score the Rewritten Content

Apply the same 5-dimension scoring to the rewritten version. Compute the GEO Score After: X/100. Show the delta clearly: e.g., "GEO Score: 38/100 → 84/100 (+46 points)"


Step 6: Generate Outputs

Output A: HTML Report

Read /mnt/skills/public/frontend-design/SKILL.md for design tokens and styling before writing the HTML.

The report must include:

  1. Header — Article title, source URL (if provided), optimization date
  2. Score Card — Before/after GEO score with visual progress bars for each dimension
  3. Audit Summary — Per-dimension issues with severity labels (High / Medium / Low)
  4. Meta Suggestions — New slug, SEO title, meta description, H1
  5. Before/After Sections — Original vs. rewritten for each major section (use a toggle/collapsible pattern)
  6. FAQ Section — Newly written FAQ rendered cleanly at the bottom

Save to: /mnt/user-data/outputs/geo-report.html

Output B: DOCX

Read /mnt/skills/public/docx/SKILL.md before generating the file.

The .docx must have two sections:

Section 1 — Cover Page

  • Article title (large, bold, dark navy 1E3A5F)
  • Left border accent on title block
  • Meta block: Slug, SEO Title, Meta Description, H1, Mode, Date
  • GEO Score summary: Before / After / Improvement
  • Score breakdown table (5 dimensions × Before/After/Change)
  • Page break after cover

Section 2 — Article Body (with footer showing page numbers)

  • Full rewritten article, clean and publish-ready
  • Heading hierarchy: H1 (36pt navy) → H2 (26pt navy) → H3 (22pt accent blue)
  • Body text in Calibri 11pt (22 half-points), color 2C2C2C
  • Tables: light gray headers (E8EEF4) with dark text, alternating row fills (F7F9FB). Always use ShadingType.CLEAR — never SOLID. Always set both columnWidths on the table AND width on each cell.
  • FAQ section at the bottom with H2 heading, divider, then Q (bold navy) + A (indented body) pairs
  • No audit commentary anywhere — just the finished article

Use Calibri as the default font throughout. Set page size explicitly: US Letter 12240 × 15840 DXA, 1" margins (1440 DXA each side).

Save to: /mnt/user-data/outputs/geo-optimized-article.docx


GEO Principles (The Why Behind Every Decision)

  • Retrieval first: AI engines match queries to headings and opening sentences before body text. Query-shaped H1s and H2s win.
  • Answer-first: AI quotes the first clear answer it finds. Put the conclusion before the context.
  • Chunkability: AI engines extract sections independently. Every section must stand alone.
  • Citation-friendly formats: Definitions, numbered steps, bullets, FAQs, and comparison tables are the formats AI engines quote most.
  • Specificity wins: Concrete claims with numbers and sources get cited. Vague generalities do not.
  • Self-contained sections: No cross-references. No "as we discussed." If a section needs the previous one to make sense, rewrite it.

Edge Cases

  • Short content (<500 words): Flag it. GEO optimization works best on 800+ word posts. Still optimize what exists and recommend which sections to expand.
  • Non-English content: Optimize in the same language as the input.
  • Already high-scoring content (>80/100): Focus the report on the remaining gaps. Don't rewrite what's already working — annotate it as "strong" and move on.
  • Thin or promotional content: If the content is mostly marketing copy with little informational value, flag this explicitly. GEO optimization cannot compensate for low informational depth — recommend expanding the substance first.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Create accessibility testing plans covering assistive technologies and WCAG criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Infrasity-Labs のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する