本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ce-dhh-rails-style

This skill should be used when writing Ruby and Rails code in DHH's distinctive 37signals style. It applies when writing Ruby code, Rails applications, creating models, controllers, or any Ruby file. Triggers on Ruby/Rails code generation, refactoring requests, code review, or when the user mentions DHH, 37signals, Basecamp, HEY, or Campfire style. Embodies REST purity, fat models, thin controllers, Current attributes, Hotwire patterns, and the "clarity over cleverness" philosophy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/coreスター 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • references/architecture.md12.8 KB
  • references/controllers.md6.2 KB
  • references/frontend.md10.4 KB
  • references/gems.md5.6 KB
  • references/models.md7.3 KB
  • references/testing.md6.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<objective> Apply 37signals/DHH Rails conventions to Ruby and Rails code. This skill provides comprehensive domain expertise extracted from analyzing production 37signals codebases (Fizzy/Campfire) and DHH's code review patterns. </objective>

<essential_principles>

Core Philosophy

"The best code is the code you don't write. The second best is the code that's obviously correct."

Vanilla Rails is plenty:

  • Rich domain models over service objects
  • CRUD controllers over custom actions
  • Concerns for horizontal code sharing
  • Records as state instead of boolean columns
  • Database-backed everything (no Redis)
  • Build solutions before reaching for gems

What they deliberately avoid:

  • devise (custom ~150-line auth instead)
  • pundit/cancancan (simple role checks in models)
  • sidekiq (Solid Queue uses database)
  • redis (database for everything)
  • view_component (partials work fine)
  • GraphQL (REST with Turbo sufficient)
  • factory_bot (fixtures are simpler)
  • rspec (Minitest ships with Rails)
  • Tailwind (native CSS with layers)

Development Philosophy:

  • Ship, Validate, Refine - prototype-quality code to production to learn
  • Fix root causes, not symptoms
  • Write-time operations over read-time computations
  • Database constraints over ActiveRecord validations </essential_principles>
<intake> What are you working on?
  1. Controllers - REST mapping, concerns, Turbo responses, API patterns
  2. Models - Concerns, state records, callbacks, scopes, POROs
  3. Views & Frontend - Turbo, Stimulus, CSS, partials
  4. Architecture - Routing, multi-tenancy, authentication, jobs, caching
  5. Testing - Minitest, fixtures, integration tests
  6. Gems & Dependencies - What to use vs avoid
  7. Code Review - Review code against DHH style
  8. General Guidance - Philosophy and conventions

Specify a number or describe your task. </intake>

<routing>
ResponseReference to Read
1, controllerreferences/controllers.md
2, modelreferences/models.md
3, view, frontend, turbo, stimulus, cssreferences/frontend.md
4, architecture, routing, auth, job, cachereferences/architecture.md
5, test, testing, minitest, fixturereferences/testing.md
6, gem, dependency, libraryreferences/gems.md
7, reviewRead all references, then review code
8, general taskRead relevant references based on context

After reading relevant references, apply patterns to the user's code. </routing>

<quick_reference>

Naming Conventions

Verbs: card.close, card.gild, board.publish (not set_style methods)

Predicates: card.closed?, card.golden? (derived from presence of related record)

Concerns: Adjectives describing capability (Closeable, Publishable, Watchable)

Controllers: Nouns matching resources (Cards::ClosuresController)

Scopes:

  • chronologically, reverse_chronologically, alphabetically, latest
  • preloaded (standard eager loading name)
  • indexed_by, sorted_by (parameterized)
  • active, unassigned (business terms, not SQL-ish)

REST Mapping

Instead of custom actions, create new resources:

POST /cards/:id/close    → POST /cards/:id/closure
DELETE /cards/:id/close  → DELETE /cards/:id/closure
POST /cards/:id/archive  → POST /cards/:id/archival

Ruby Syntax Preferences

# Symbol arrays with spaces inside brackets
before_action :set_message, only: %i[ show edit update destroy ]

# Private method indentation
  private
    def set_message
      @message = Message.find(params[:id])
    end

# Expression-less case for conditionals
case
when params[:before].present?
  messages.page_before(params[:before])
else
  messages.last_page
end

# Bang methods for fail-fast
@message = Message.create!(params)

# Ternaries for simple conditionals
@room.direct? ? @room.users : @message.mentionees

Key Patterns

State as Records:

Card.joins(:closure)         # closed cards
Card.where.missing(:closure) # open cards

Current Attributes:

belongs_to :creator, default: -> { Current.user }

Authorization on Models:

class User < ApplicationRecord
  def can_administer?(message)
    message.creator == self || admin?
  end
end

</quick_reference>

<reference_index>

Domain Knowledge

All detailed patterns in references/:

FileTopics
references/controllers.mdREST mapping, concerns, Turbo responses, API patterns, HTTP caching
references/models.mdConcerns, state records, callbacks, scopes, POROs, authorization, broadcasting
references/frontend.mdTurbo Streams, Stimulus controllers, CSS layers, OKLCH colors, partials
references/architecture.mdRouting, authentication, jobs, Current attributes, caching, database patterns
references/testing.mdMinitest, fixtures, unit/integration/system tests, testing patterns
references/gems.mdWhat they use vs avoid, decision framework, Gemfile examples
</reference_index>

<success_criteria> Code follows DHH style when:

  • Controllers map to CRUD verbs on resources
  • Models use concerns for horizontal behavior
  • State is tracked via records, not booleans
  • No unnecessary service objects or abstractions
  • Database-backed solutions preferred over external services
  • Tests use Minitest with fixtures
  • Turbo/Stimulus for interactivity (no heavy JS frameworks)
  • Native CSS with modern features (layers, OKLCH, nesting)
  • Authorization logic lives on User model
  • Jobs are shallow wrappers calling model methods </success_criteria>
<credits> Based on [The Unofficial 37signals/DHH Rails Style Guide](https://github.com/marckohlbrugge/unofficial-37signals-coding-style-guide) by [Marc Köhlbrugge](https://x.com/marckohlbrugge), generated through deep analysis of 265 pull requests from the Fizzy codebase.

Important Disclaimers:

  • LLM-generated guide - may contain inaccuracies
  • Code examples from Fizzy are licensed under the O'Saasy License
  • Not affiliated with or endorsed by 37signals </credits>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

ask-matt

無料

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before writing a right-sized requirements document and planning implementation. Use for feature ideas, problem framing, when the user says 'let's brainstorm', or when they want to think through options before deciding what to build. Also use when a user describes a vague or ambitious feature request, asks 'what should we build', 'help me think through X', presents a problem with multiple valid solutions, or seems unsure about scope or direction — even if they don't explicitly ask to brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Clean up local branches whose remote tracking branch is gone. Use when the user says "clean up branches", "delete gone branches", "prune local branches", "clean gone", or wants to remove stale local branches that no longer exist on the remote. Also handles removing associated worktrees for branches that have them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

JesusFilm のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する