本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

lfg

Full autonomous engineering workflow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/coreスター 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitHub

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • references/tracker-defer.md13.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CRITICAL: You MUST execute every step below IN ORDER. Do NOT skip any required step. Do NOT jump ahead to coding or implementation. The plan phase (step 1) MUST be completed and verified BEFORE any work begins. Violating this order produces bad output.

When invoking any skill referenced below, resolve its name against the available-skills list the host platform provides and use that exact entry. Some platforms list skills under a plugin namespace (e.g., compound-engineering:ce-plan); others list the bare name. Invoking a short-form guess that isn't in the list will fail — always match a listed entry verbatim before calling the Skill/Task tool.

  1. Invoke the ce-plan skill with $ARGUMENTS.

    GATE: STOP. If ce-plan reported the task is non-software and cannot be processed in pipeline mode, stop the pipeline and inform the user that LFG requires software tasks. Otherwise, verify that the ce-plan workflow produced a plan file in docs/plans/. If no plan file was created, invoke ce-plan again with $ARGUMENTS. Do NOT proceed to step 2 until a written plan exists. Record the plan file path — it will be passed to ce-code-review in step 3.

  2. Invoke the ce-work skill.

    GATE: STOP. Verify that implementation work was performed - files were created or modified beyond the plan. Do NOT proceed to step 3 if no code changes were made.

  3. Invoke the ce-code-review skill with mode:autofix plan:<plan-path-from-step-1>.

    Pass the plan file path from step 1 so ce-code-review can verify requirements completeness. Read the Residual Actionable Work summary the skill emits.

  4. Persist review autofixes (REQUIRED after step 3, before residual handoff)

    Check git status --short. If ce-code-review mode:autofix changed files, stage only those review-fix files, commit them with fix(review): apply autofix feedback, and push the current branch before continuing. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. Do not proceed to step 5, run browser tests, or output DONE while review autofix edits remain only in the working tree. If no files changed, explicitly note that there were no review autofixes to persist.

  5. Autonomous residual handoff (only when step 3 reported one or more residual downstream-resolver findings; skip when it reported Residual actionable work: none.)

    Do not prompt the user. This step embraces the autopilot contract: residuals must become durable before DONE, but the agent never stops to ask.

    1. Load references/tracker-defer.md in non-interactive mode. Pass the residual actionable findings from step 3's summary (or the run artifact when the summary was truncated).

    2. Collect the structured return: { filed: [...], failed: [...], no_sink: [...] }.

    3. Compose a ## Residual Review Findings markdown section from the structured return:

      • For each item in filed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and a link to the tracker ticket URL.
      • For each item in failed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and the failure reason (e.g., Defer failed: gh returned 401 — tracker unavailable).
      • For each item in no_sink: a bullet with severity, file:line, and title inlined verbatim so the PR body or fallback file is the durable record.
    4. Detect the current branch's open PR without prompting:

      gh pr view --json number,url,body,state
      
    5. If an open PR exists, update it directly with gh; do not load any confirmation-driven PR update skill. Append or replace the ## Residual Review Findings section in the current PR body, write the new body to an OS temp file, then run:

      gh pr edit PR_NUMBER --body-file BODY_FILE
      
    6. If no open PR exists, create a tracked fallback file at docs/residual-review-findings/<branch-or-head-sha>.md containing the composed section and the source PR-review run context. Stage only that file, commit it with docs(review): record residual review findings, and push the current branch. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. This is the durable no-PR sink. Do not output DONE until either the existing PR body has been updated or this fallback file commit has been pushed. If both paths fail, stop and report the failed commands; do not silently proceed.

    Never block DONE on tracker filing failures once residuals have been durably recorded. A no_sink outcome is success only when the findings are present in the PR body or in the pushed fallback file.

  6. Invoke the ce-test-browser skill with mode:pipeline.

  7. Invoke the ce-commit-push-pr skill.

    This commits any remaining changes, pushes the branch, and opens a pull request. If step 5 already opened a PR (check with gh pr view --json number,url,state 2>/dev/null), skip PR creation but still commit and push any uncommitted changes.

  8. Output <promise>DONE</promise> when complete

Start with step 1 now. Remember: plan FIRST, then work. Never skip the plan.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

ask-matt

無料

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before writing a right-sized requirements document and planning implementation. Use for feature ideas, problem framing, when the user says 'let's brainstorm', or when they want to think through options before deciding what to build. Also use when a user describes a vague or ambitious feature request, asks 'what should we build', 'help me think through X', presents a problem with multiple valid solutions, or seems unsure about scope or direction — even if they don't explicitly ask to brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Clean up local branches whose remote tracking branch is gone. Use when the user says "clean up branches", "delete gone branches", "prune local branches", "clean gone", or wants to remove stale local branches that no longer exist on the remote. Also handles removing associated worktrees for branches that have them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JesusFilm/core252026年10月29日 更新

JesusFilm のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する