本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

superior-database

Design, implement, review, or repair database schemas, queries, indexes, transactions, migrations, and backfills with explicit integrity and rollout constraints. Use when the datastore behavior or data lifecycle is a primary part of the task. Do not use for routine persistence calls whose schema and consistency contracts are unchanged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skillsスター 23(GitHub 23 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB
  • references/safe-migrations-and-backfills.md3.1 KB
  • references/schema-query-and-index-design.md3.1 KB
  • references/transactions-and-consistency.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Superior Database

Make data changes correct for the actual datastore, workload, and rollout environment. Preserve established migration tools and ownership boundaries; do not import generic database conventions without verifying engine behavior and repository practice.

Establish the data contract

Before changing a schema, query, or migration, determine:

  • datastore engine, version, topology, and relevant extensions;
  • authoritative schema and migration history;
  • entity ownership, identifiers, relationships, and tenant boundaries;
  • invariants that must hold at write time and read time;
  • expected cardinality, access patterns, ordering, and retention;
  • compatibility window across application versions, workers, and replicas;
  • data volume, traffic shape, lock sensitivity, and recovery expectations.

Inspect effective production constraints only through authorized, non-sensitive evidence. Do not assume local fixtures represent production volume, skew, nullability, or legacy states.

Design schema and queries together

Read references/schema-query-and-index-design.md when adding or changing tables, collections, fields, relationships, indexes, query shapes, pagination, or retention behavior.

  • Encode durable invariants in the datastore when the engine and rollout permit it.
  • Keep application validation for user feedback, but do not rely on it as the sole protection against concurrent or alternate writers.
  • Select indexes from real predicates, joins, ordering, uniqueness, and cardinality rather than indexing every filtered field.
  • Verify query semantics for nulls, collation, timezones, ordering ties, and empty sets.
  • Bound result sets and write batches; avoid hidden full scans, unbounded fan-out, and per-row queries.

Do not denormalize, partition, shard, or introduce a cache without demonstrated workload pressure and a clear consistency owner.

Preserve transactional truth

Read references/transactions-and-consistency.md when work spans related writes, concurrent actors, replicas, queues, caches, idempotency, or cross-service workflows.

  • Define the invariant and the exact boundary that must be atomic.
  • Use datastore guarantees deliberately; do not infer serialization from application request order.
  • Keep transactions short and avoid remote calls while holding locks unless the established architecture proves it safe.
  • Make retryable operations idempotent and distinguish transaction retry from business-operation replay.
  • Treat cache invalidation, replica lag, and event publication as explicit consistency contracts.

Plan migrations as deployments

Read references/safe-migrations-and-backfills.md for production-facing schema changes, constraint introduction, type changes, table rewrites, backfills, data repair, or removal of old representations.

  • Prefer compatibility-first expand, migrate, verify, and contract phases when multiple application versions may coexist.
  • Identify locks, rewrites, validation cost, replication impact, and failure recovery before execution.
  • Make backfills bounded, observable, resumable, and idempotent where practical.
  • Define verification and rollback or forward-recovery behavior before destructive or irreversible steps.
  • Never run a production migration, destructive query, broad data correction, or shared-environment load test without explicit authorization and the intended environment.

A migration file compiling locally is not evidence that its production execution is safe.

Verify the result

Use the repository's existing database and test tooling. Verify proportionately:

  • migration applies from the supported previous state and reaches the intended schema;
  • rollback works when it is promised and semantically possible;
  • old and new application versions behave according to the compatibility plan;
  • constraints reject invalid states and preserve valid legacy data;
  • representative queries return correct results with stable ordering;
  • query plans and runtime behavior are checked against representative shape and scale when performance is in scope;
  • backfill counts, checkpoints, error handling, and reruns preserve invariants.

Report commands actually run, datastore/version used, data scale represented, and conditions not exercised. Never claim zero downtime without evidence for the relevant engine, topology, workload, and deployment sequence.

Combine skills narrowly

  • Use superior-logic for domain behavior, API contracts, and application orchestration around persistence.
  • Use superior-testing when migration, integration, compatibility, or concurrency test design is a primary concern.
  • Use superior-debugging when a data symptom exists but its causal mechanism is uncertain.
  • Use superior-performance when representative query, capacity, resource, or latency measurement is a primary concern.
  • Use superior-reliability when replication, availability, failover, backup objectives, or recovery readiness is primary.
  • Use superior-delivery when migrations must be coordinated with artifact promotion, rollout, or rollback.
  • Use superior-api-security for tenant isolation, unsafe query construction, sensitive-data exposure, or abuse-driven resource controls.
  • Use superior-docs after verified schema, migration, recovery, or operational procedure changes.

Do not broaden a focused database change into a datastore replacement, ORM rewrite, or infrastructure migration without explicit scope.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Review or implement interface accessibility for semantics, keyboard operation, focus, contrast, status communication, zoom, and assistive technology. Use when accessibility is explicitly requested, required by the product contract, or a changed interaction creates substantial accessibility risk. Do not activate for every visual edit or use it as a generic design audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

Implement, harden, or review defensive security controls for REST APIs, including authentication and authorization boundaries, validation, rate limiting, abuse prevention, resource limits, SSRF defenses, safe errors, logging, and security tests. Use when API security, endpoint hardening, threat review, rate limiting, token handling, or sensitive business-flow protection is an explicit concern. Do not use for ordinary endpoint logic without meaningful security scope or for offensive exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

Design, implement, or assess project structure, module ownership, dependency boundaries, and safe file or folder organization. Use when project architecture, feature placement, separation of responsibilities, or architectural refactoring is a primary concern, including new framework projects. For a read-only assessment, do not modify files unless the user also requests changes; do not activate merely because ordinary feature work adds a file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

Review a code change, diff, commit, branch, or pull request for actionable defects, regressions, security risks, compatibility breaks, and missing verification. Use when code review is the primary requested outcome. Keep the review read-only unless the user explicitly asks to implement fixes; do not use as a substitute for implementation or a specialized visual audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

Add, revise, or remove source-code comments while preserving executable behavior. Use for comment-only cleanup, documentation comments, TODO quality, and reducing narration. Do not use when the requested change modifies logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

Write or revise user-facing product and marketing copy with a specific voice, verifiable claims, natural rhythm, and useful actions. Use for interface labels, onboarding, landing pages, help text, and product messaging. Do not use for code comments or neutral technical documentation unless tone editing is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KodekaTeam/superior-skills232026年10月29日 更新

KodekaTeam のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する