Liferayのソースコードを対象に、対応する整形ツールとルールを使って形式をそろえ、生成ファイルを避けながら修正対象を確認できます。
- モジュールのソースを整形したいとき
- コミット済み変更の書式を確認したいとき
- Goやシェルの整形ルールを適用したいとき
現在のブランチからGitHubのPRを作成し、関連するJiraチケットをレビュー状態に移してPRのURLを記録する手順を進めます。
Create a GitHub PR for the current branch. Use when the user asks to create a PR, send a PR, or invokes /pr.
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見る現在のブランチにある変更からGitHubのPRを作成し、関連するJiraチケットと結び付けます。コミットのチケット番号を集め、対象リポジトリやベースブランチを確認したうえで、タイトルと本文を用意します。本文には修正内容、変更方法、PRチェックの結果を記載します。PR作成前にタイトルと本文を提示し、利用者の承認後に作成します。作成後はチケットごとに対象となる課題を特定し、レビュー状態への移行とPR URLの記録を進めます。
ブランチの変更をPRとして提出し、Jiraの作業記録も合わせて更新したいときに使えます。複数のチケットにまたがる変更や、フォーク先を指定したPRの準備にも対応する手順が含まれています。
通常は pr-check の成功が必要です。テストを追加するコミットがない場合は理由が必要です。PR本文を提示した後、承認を得て作成します。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Create a GitHub PR for the current branch, transition the linked Jira tickets to review, and record the PR URL on those tickets.
The base branch is master in liferay/liferay-portal and master-private in liferay/liferay-portal-ee. Use the base branch of the repository that a remote of this checkout points at (check git remote --verbose).
Below, ${BASE_BRANCH} stands for that base branch, and <repository> stands for that repository without its organization, such as liferay-portal.
At least one commit adds tests. When none do, ask the user for a rationale and refuse to proceed without one. The only exceptions are PRs with no code changes (e.g., language key updates or markdown changes).
The current branch is a development branch, not ${BASE_BRANCH} or any other protected branch.
The pr-check skill must pass. Skip only when ${ARGUMENTS} contains --skip-pr-check. A skip requires a reason: take it from the text following the flag when present, otherwise prompt the user for one. The reason is recorded in the PR Check section, which is written for a skip rather than omitted. When ${ARGUMENTS} contains --skip-pr-reviewer, pass the flag and the text following it to pr-check, which skips only its PR Reviewer validation.
The current Git branch must contain the commits ready to ship.
A branch may span more than one ticket. Resolve the ticket set — every ticket the PR touches.
The ticket key follows the pattern LPD-12345, LCD-12345, LRCI-1234, and similar forms (uppercase letters, hyphen, digits).
Collect every distinct ticket key from the subjects of the branch's commits relative to ${BASE_BRANCH}. Each subject is prefixed with its ticket (LPD-12345 <subject>); extract every distinct key, in commit order (oldest first). When no commit carries a ticket, prompt the user for one.
The target repository defaults to <fork-owner>/<repository>. When ${ARGUMENTS} names a different org/repo, use that; when it matches an alias below, expand the alias; otherwise, ask the user to choose <fork-owner> from the teams below, leaving out any team that has no fork of <repository>:
liferay-acliferay-appsecliferay-bpmliferay-commerceliferay-content-managementliferay-core-infraliferay-database-infraliferay-devtoolsliferay-frontendliferay-headlessliferay-page-managementliferay-platform-experienceliferay-searchliferay-site-managementWhen the pr-check run reports that the branch sits on the forward target and ${ARGUMENTS} names no repository, use the forward target instead of asking.
The following short aliases resolve to a target repository:
brian → brianchandotcom/<repository>The PR head is <github-username>:<branch-name> (the GitHub username is read from the user's origin remote URL — for example, git@github.com:brianchandotcom/liferay-portal.git yields brianchandotcom), and the base is ${BASE_BRANCH}.
Push the current branch to the user's remote when it has not been pushed yet or when new local commits exist.
The title is concise (under 72 characters) and prefixed with the key of the first ticket in the set:
LPD-83847 Fix OutOfMemoryError during batch engine import
The body follows this format, with one browse link per ticket in the set:
https://liferay.atlassian.net/browse/TICKET-ID-1
https://liferay.atlassian.net/browse/TICKET-ID-2
## What Is Being Fixed
Explain the problem or bug that motivated the change — what was going wrong or what was missing.
## How It Is Being Fixed
Explain the approach taken across all commits. Describe the key changes and the reasoning behind the approach. Write in plain prose rather than bullet points.
## Why Are There No Tests?
This optional section is only included when the commits do not add any tests. It should contain the rationale provided by the user.
## PR Check
<pr-check Results Summary>
<!-- pr-check {"result": "<state>", "sha": "<tested-SHA>"} -->
The PR Check section is the Results Summary block emitted by the pr-check skill that ran as the precondition — the overall state line, the tested SHA, the table of validations, and every note appended below it, since any row can carry a note, a PASS included — pasted verbatim, followed by a hidden marker. The marker is an HTML comment, invisible in rendered Markdown, whose payload is a JSON object of the form <!-- pr-check {"result": "<state>", "sha": "<tested-SHA>"} -->, where <state> is success when the overall state is PASS and failure when it is FAIL, so a run carrying NOT VERIFIED rows records success, and <tested-SHA> is the full 40-character SHA from the Results Summary. The webhook reads the result and sha fields to apply the pr-check commit status to that SHA and the pr-check - <state> label to the PR, so this skill records no status or label itself.
When build/test-plan/result.json exists and its head is the tested SHA, add a Test plan: <count> run, <passed> passed. line between the Results Summary block and the marker. Leave it out otherwise. Put a blank line before and after it. <count> is the number of entries in tests. <passed> is the number of those entries whose result is passed.
When pr-check was skipped via --skip-pr-check, still write the section, but as a skip rather than a run. Under the same ## PR Check heading, the body is a single **pr-check: SKIPPED** — <reason> line with no table, and the marker payload adds a reason field alongside result (set to skipped) and the PR head SHA. The JSON object keys are alphabetical (reason, result, sha).
**pr-check: SKIPPED** — <reason>
<!-- pr-check {"reason": "<reason>", "result": "skipped", "sha": "<head-SHA>"} -->
The webhook applies the status and label when it processes the pull_request event for the newly opened PR, so no publish step is needed at creation. Use the pr-check-publish skill only to record a later pr-check run on an existing PR.
Use a direct, to-the-point style. Avoid being verbose. Present the proposed title and body to the user before submitting, and proceed once they approve.
Create the pull request with --body-file, or with --body from a quoted-heredoc variable; either keeps the marker's literal ! off the command line, where it could otherwise trigger history expansion and corrupt the marker. Use mktemp for the file so it stays out of the working tree, and remove it afterward.
body_file=$(mktemp)
gh pr create \
--base "${BASE_BRANCH}" \
--body-file "${body_file}" \
--head <github-username>:<branch-name> \
--repo <target-org/repo> \
--title "<title>"
rm "${body_file}"
Apply the steps below to every ticket in the ticket set, recording the outcome per ticket and continuing on failure.
For each ticket, fetch it (issue type, status, subtasks) and resolve the target ticket — the one whose status reflects active work and on which the PR URL is recorded:
| Ticket Type | Target |
|---|---|
Bug (10004) | The bug itself |
Task (10002) | Its Technical Task (10153) subtask |
Technical Task (10153) | Itself |
When the target is not already in an in-progress status, transition it first:
| Target Type | Destination | Transition ID |
|---|---|---|
| Bug | In Progress | 61 |
| Technical Task | In Progress | 41 |
Then transition it to review:
| Target Type | Destination | Transition ID |
|---|---|---|
| Bug | In Review | 71 |
| Technical Task | In Peer Review | 31 |
When the review transition fails (for example, because the ticket is already in a later status), still proceed to record the PR URL.
Set the Git Pull Request field (customfield_10201) on the target ticket to the new PR URL.
This handling applies per target ticket, while recording the PR URL above.
When the Git Pull Request field already holds one or more PR URLs, ask the user whether the new PR supersedes the existing one or is added alongside it.
When the user chooses supersede:
Overwrite Git Pull Request with the new PR URL, dropping the previous value.
Add a comment on the previous PR, linking to the new one (for example, Superseded by <new-pr-url>.).
Close the previous PR when possible. When the user lacks permission to close it directly, add a ci:close comment instead, so the CI bot closes it.
When the user chooses add:
Report back to the user with:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Liferayのソースコードを対象に、対応する整形ツールとルールを使って形式をそろえ、生成ファイルを避けながら修正対象を確認できます。
不具合の説明や修正コミットから必要事項を整理し、再現手順や期待・実際の動作を含むバグチケットをLPDプロジェクトのJiraに登録できます。
説明やコミット内容をもとに、必要な情報を整えてLPDプロジェクトのJiraにタスクを登録し、チケット番号と閲覧URLを受け取れます。
Liferay向けのMarkdown文書を、前付けの順序や見出しの表記、シェル記法、文章の調子まで整え、リポジトリの規約に沿った読みやすい形に仕上げます。
LiferayのPoshi `.testcase` を内容に応じてPlaywright、Jest、JUnit、Java統合テストへ移行し、既存テストとの重複や移行を妨げる条件も整理します。
LiferayコンポーネントのPoshiテストを調べ、重複するテストを統合・整理する計画を立ててから、確認しやすい単位でテスト数を減らします。