本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

loop-engineering

Use when a repeatable task must become a bounded Trigger -> Execute -> Verify -> State loop, scheduled automation, goal agent, or metric-driven research cycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skillsスター 141(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml246 B
  • references/ci-repair-loop-example.md4.6 KB
  • scripts/validate_loop_contract.py8.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Loop Engineering

<skill_contract> <input>A repeatable task with inspectable state, finite budgets, permissions, and an independent verifier.</input> <output>A validated Trigger -> Execute -> Verify -> State contract plus resumable run receipts.</output> <done>The declared metric or stop condition is supported by fresh validator and verifier evidence.</done> <non_goals>Dependency-graph orchestration, unbounded autonomy, or self-certified completion.</non_goals>

Build loops only when repeated execution creates evidence. Every loop needs admission, a validated contract, durable state, independent evaluation, bounded retries, stop/recovery rules, and a final receipt.

Usage Template

Provide: objective, trigger, scope/non-goals, inputs, state/artifact paths, metric, verifier, permissions, budgets, stop condition, recovery, and write-back. See references/ci-repair-loop-example.md for a worked contract.

Workflow

<intake>

Select one mode:

  • Goal: run until a defined end state or cap.
  • Loop: poll/iterate while eligible work exists.
  • Automation: start from an external schedule/event; the trigger is not execution evidence.
  • AutoResearch: vary experiments against an objective metric in a sandbox.

Admit only if work is repeatable, outputs are inspectable, a verifier exists, failures are recoverable, and autonomy is worth the orchestration/review cost. Otherwise use a one-shot workflow.

Use graph-engineering instead when explicit data dependencies, independent branches, typed joins, or node-local recovery create measurable value. A Graph node may use this Loop contract for local repetition; Graph width does not replace finite Loop depth.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

Classify unknowns as known, probeable, testable, or blocked. Missing objective, verifier, permission boundary, budget, or recovery is NEEDS_INPUT; do not infer these controls from intent. Unknown implementation details may be resolved inside the loop only when the probe is bounded and reversible.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>

Write this contract before acting:

Objective:                 Mode: Goal | Loop | Automation | AutoResearch
Trigger:                   Scope:                 Non-goals:
Owner:                     Inputs:
Artifacts path:            State path:            Work clock:
Success metric:            Evidence:              Verifier:
Topology: single-agent | maker-checker | manager-workers
Max iterations:            Time limit:            Budget:
Review budget:             Stop condition:
Write-back:                Permission boundary:   Recovery:

Validate it with scripts/validate_loop_contract.py --strict. Then iterate:

  1. Observe: load durable state, fresh environment evidence, budgets, and last error.
  2. Orient: update one hypothesis; choose the smallest action that can change the metric.
  3. Decide: check scope, permissions, expected evidence, and rollback.
  4. Act: execute one bounded action and capture artifact/diff/receipt.
  5. Verify: use a deterministic check or independent checker; compare metric and guardrails.
  6. State: append diagnosis, action, evidence, delta, budget, and next decision atomically.
  7. Stop/continue: stop on success, cap, permission boundary, regression, repeated signature, or no useful work.

Normalize the model/runtime termination signal after every action. complete still requires the declared verifier; tool_request returns proposed arguments to the host permission gate; checkpoint/truncation persists state before any continuation; refusal, error, or unknown escalates. Never infer completion from fluent prose or from the word "stop" alone.

For maintenance and queue loops, declare an allowed NO_OP outcome and its eligibility query. A quiet iteration is successful only when the query proves there was no eligible work, output count is within policy, and no side effect occurred.

Use single-agent by default, maker-checker for ambiguous/high-risk evaluation, and manager-workers only for genuinely independent work with an explicit integration gate.

If a validated Graph owns the dependency topology, this skill owns only the bounded retry behavior inside its declared loop nodes.

</execute> <evaluate>

The verifier must test the declared result rather than reward activity. Check evidence freshness, metric movement, guardrails, scope, and state replay. For external or consequential actions, require approval and verified rollback before crossing the boundary.

</evaluate>

<retry_policy>

max_attempts equals the contract's finite max iterations. Retry only after a named diagnosis and a changed input, tool, scope, or strategy. Stop on the same failure signature twice, metric regression, exhausted review budget, or NO_PROGRESS.

</retry_policy>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus contract version, trigger receipt, hypothesis, action, normalized termination reason, artifact/diff, metric/guardrail delta, permissions, output count, no-op receipt, work clock, and recovery point. Append iterations; write current state atomically.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: a mandatory contract field is absent; do not start.
  • BLOCKED_PERMISSION: the next action crosses authority; checkpoint and request approval.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: result or guardrail fails; rollback/regroup before another attempt.
  • NO_PROGRESS: the same signature repeats or the metric is unchanged after a changed attempt.
  • BUDGET_STOP: any iteration, time, tool, cost, or review cap fires. max_attempts is always finite.

Output Contract

Return status, result (metric/end-state decision), evidence (validator and iteration receipts), unknowns, and next_action (stop, retry, approval, recovery, or handoff).

Edge Cases

  • A scheduled job fired but produced no run receipt: status is triggered, not completed; inspect executor state.
  • The model ends because its context or token budget is exhausted: checkpoint and return BUDGET_STOP or resume from state; do not label truncation success.
  • A queue poll returns zero items: accept NO_OP only after the declared query and side-effect check pass.
  • The metric improves while a safety guardrail regresses: rollback and return VERIFY_FAILED; never optimize the headline metric alone.

Success Metrics

  • The strict validator passes before execution.
  • Every iteration changes evidence, state, or diagnosis within finite budgets.
  • A fresh verifier supports the final status and residual risk.

Quality Gates

  • Trigger, owner, topology, budgets, stop, recovery, and write-back are explicit.
  • Builder opinion is not the only verifier.
  • Termination classes and any legal no-op have host-owned routing and evidence.
  • State replay recovers the next decision losslessly.
  • External mutation requires approval and rollback.

</skill_contract>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Mark393295827 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する