本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

project-flow-ops

Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skillsスター 141(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Project Flow Ops

<skill_contract> <input>Project objective, tasks, owners, dependencies, budgets, artifacts, current states, and definitions of done.</input> <output>A WIP-limited project state with ranked work, explicit blockers, bounded actions, and verified closure receipts.</output> <done>Every active item has one owner and observable artifact, and completion is backed by its named fresh verification.</done> <non_goals>Hidden WIP, duplicate ownership, status by intuition, backlog accumulation, or completion without evidence.</non_goals>

Maintain a small, inspectable project state machine: BACKLOG -> ACTIVE -> BLOCKED | COMPLETED. Optimize flow and verified outcomes, not task volume.

Usage Template

Provide: project objective, current tasks, owners, dependencies, time budget, artifacts, and definition of done. Optional: prior review receipts.

Workflow

<intake>

Normalize each item into {id, objective, owner, state, artifact, definition_of_done, budget, dependencies}. Reject duplicate ownership and distinguish waiting from active execution.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

If an active item lacks an owner, artifact, or observable definition of done, return NEEDS_INPUT. Probe the ambiguity with the largest impact on scheduling; do not guess priority from wording alone.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>
  1. Rank work by objective impact, urgency, dependency leverage, and cost of delay.
  2. Limit ACTIVE to one or two items per owner.
  3. Decompose the selected item until one bounded action can produce a reviewable artifact.
  4. For a blocker, record owner, missing condition, evidence, next probe, and review time; move independent work forward.
  5. Run the verification named in the definition of done.
  6. Move to COMPLETED only with a fresh receipt; otherwise keep ACTIVE or BLOCKED.
  7. At review, remove stale backlog items and state the next constraint.
</execute> <evaluate>

Check state-transition legality, WIP limits, ownership, artifact existence, and completion evidence. Use an independent check for consequential deliverables. If verification fails, reopen the item with the failure evidence and smallest corrective action.

</evaluate>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus project objective, task ledger, dependency map, WIP count, transition history, and receipts. Transitions are append-only events; current state is derived from the latest valid event.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: ownership, priority boundary, or definition of done is missing.
  • BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY: execution cannot continue; preserve the blocker contract and review time.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: the artifact fails its named check; reopen rather than relabel completion.
  • NO_PROGRESS: two reviews produce no new evidence; reduce scope, change strategy, or escalate.
  • BUDGET_STOP: stop active work, persist state, and report the highest-value next action.

Output Contract

Return status, result (project board and transition decisions), evidence (artifacts and receipts), unknowns, and next_action with owner and review time.

Edge Cases

  • Everything is marked urgent: use cost of delay and dependency leverage, then force one explicit tradeoff.
  • A task is 90% complete but verification is unavailable: keep it active or blocked; never infer the final 10%.

Success Metrics

  • Active WIP remains within the declared limit.
  • Every completed task has an artifact and fresh verification receipt.
  • Blocked work names an owner, next probe, and review time.

Quality Gates

  • Every active task has one owner and bounded budget.
  • State transitions are legal and traceable.
  • Completion evidence is fresh and objective.
  • The next constraint is explicit after each review.

</skill_contract>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Mark393295827 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する