Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an Obsidian wiki needs a reproducible health audit for structure, provenance, links, understanding, lifecycle, and promotion readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
<skill_contract> <input>Vault root, path configuration, audit scope, exclusions, prior baseline, and explicit repair authorization if any.</input> <output>A reproducible, severity-ranked wiki health report with file-level evidence, debt queues, and bounded repair proposals.</output> <done>All twelve checks record scope and receipts, findings are reproducible, and report-only mode leaves content unchanged.</done> <non_goals>Silent deletion, immutable-source mutation, unapproved repair, semantic rewrite, or health claims without scan evidence.</non_goals>
Audit the wiki as a governed knowledge graph. Report prioritized, reproducible findings; make no content mutation unless separately authorized.
Provide: vault root, optional path config, audit scope, prior report, and whether repairs are authorized. Default to report-only.
Resolve configured source, concept, entity, clipping, daily, system, and log paths. Record scan timestamp, file count, exclusions, and prior baseline. Fail closed if the supplied path is not the intended vault.
</intake><unknowns_gate>
If the vault root or path semantics are ambiguous, return NEEDS_INPUT before scanning or writing. Missing optional directories are findings; inaccessible required directories are BLOCKED_PERMISSION.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>Run twelve checks and preserve file-level evidence:
Classify P0 integrity loss, P1 broken provenance/navigation, P2 debt, and P3 improvement. Prefer deterministic checks; label semantic judgments separately.
Re-scan a sample of findings, deduplicate root causes, and compare counts with the prior baseline. A report is invalid if paths, scan scope, or reproduction details are absent. If repair was authorized, run the relevant check again after each bounded repair.
</evaluate><state_contract>
Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus vault fingerprint, scan scope, finding ledger, severity counts, baseline delta, authorized repairs, and receipts. Never overwrite the prior report.
</state_contract>
NEEDS_INPUT: vault identity or configured path semantics are unclear.BLOCKED_PERMISSION: required files cannot be read or an authorized report cannot be written.VERIFY_FAILED: a finding cannot be reproduced; downgrade or remove it.BUDGET_STOP: scan budget ends; return coverage and the unscanned queue rather than a whole-vault claim.Return status, result (severity-ranked findings and health summary), evidence (paths, checks, counts, samples), unknowns (coverage gaps), and next_action with owner and cheap verification.
</skill_contract>
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。