本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開日本語紹介

evidence-driven-testing

アプリの操作や変更後の動作を確かめ、画面録画やスクリーンショット、測定結果などの証拠をまとめて、指定先に結果を届けます。

原文原文の説明を見る

Records visual proof while testing UI behavior — the agent tests the app hands-on via computer use while a screen recording with structured test/assertion annotations captures the session — then posts the video and a results summary to the requested destination. Use when changed runtime behavior needs observable verification, including headless environments (scripted screenshots and probes) and non-UI changes (measured numbers, output pairs).

michaelshimeles/rstackスター 1,392(GitHub 1,392 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitHubPlaywright

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

こんなときに便利

  • UI操作を録画して動作を示したいとき
  • GUIなしで画面の状態を検証したいとき
  • APIや性能の変更を数値で確かめたいとき
  • PRに検証結果を添付したいとき

日本語での紹介

できること

変更後の動作を確かめ、内容に合った証拠を記録して結果をまとめます。GUIを操作できる環境では、エージェントがアプリを実際に操作する様子を録画し、テスト開始や検証結果の注釈を付けます。画面を使えない環境では、スクリプトで画面を撮影し、テストごとの結果を記録します。APIや性能の変更なら測定値、描画変更なら画像とピクセル比較など、画面操作以外の証拠も扱います。レポートにはテスト内容、環境、対象リビジョン、結果、注意事項を記載します。

こんなときに便利

UIの変更が実際に動くことを、レビュー担当者にも見える形で示したいときに向いています。GUIのない環境での確認や、API・性能など画面に現れない変更の検証にも使えます。

使い方の例

  • 「ログイン後の設定保存を確認し、画面録画と結果をまとめてください」
  • 「このAPI変更の前後で応答時間を測り、証拠を残してください」
  • 「このPRに、許可された範囲でテスト結果を添付してください」

注意点

録画にはPython 3、FFmpegとffprobeが必要で、OSごとの画面収録条件もあります。GUI操作には操作可能な画面と認証済みブラウザーセッションが必要です。ヘッドレス確認にはBash、Node 20以上、npm、Chromiumのシステムライブラリを使います。証拠の投稿には gh などが必要です。投稿先は依頼で指定された範囲に限ります。

この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md16.5 KB
  • scripts/evidence.py55.8 KB
  • scripts/playwright/package-lock.json1.1 KB
  • scripts/playwright/package.json134 B
  • scripts/run-playwright.sh952 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Evidence-Driven Testing

Record proof of behavior and deliver it to the requested destination.

Choose evidence proportional to the change. Use the recorder for interactive flows, scripted captures for headless UI checks, and output pairs for CLI or API changes. Documentation-only edits need content checks and verification of runnable examples, not a recording. Reuse suitable evidence already captured in the task. Publish only to destinations included in the requested work.

The recording is the capture of you testing the app via computer use: start the recorder, then drive the app yourself — click, type, navigate — through each test target. Every action in the video is the test being performed live; the recording has no value as evidence unless it shows that interactive session. If the harness has no computer-use tools but a GUI exists, drive the app with cua-driver instead (see below) — it is still your live session.

The bundled recorder, scripts/evidence.py, captures the display with FFmpeg on Linux, macOS, and Windows, timestamps each annotation you add while testing, burns them into the video on stop, and verifies the result with ffprobe. It writes evidence.mp4, report.md, and manifest.json into the session folder.

Inputs

  • Test targets (required): The behaviors/flows to verify, phrased as testable statements.
  • PR / issue (optional): Where to post the evidence. If omitted, deliver to the requester only.

The recorder

EVIDENCE below means the path to scripts/evidence.py inside this skill's folder (wherever the skill is installed, e.g. ~/.claude/skills/evidence-driven-testing/scripts/evidence.py). It needs only Python 3 and FFmpeg.

  • Check first: python3 $EVIDENCE doctor — verifies ffmpeg, ffprobe, libx264, and the ass filter (ready), then which screen-capture source works on this machine (capture_ready and the source auto will pick). Exits non-zero only when the toolchain is missing; read capture_ready before recording.

  • Platforms (--source auto picks the first available):

    OSSourceNeeds
    Linux X11 / XWaylandx11 (x11grab)DISPLAY set
    Linux Waylandwayland (wf-recorder)WAYLAND_DISPLAY set, wf-recorder on PATH, and a compositor confirmed to support wlr-screencopy — either a known wlroots one (Sway, Hyprland, river, Wayfire, labwc, dwl, niri) or verified via wayland-info. GNOME and KDE Wayland are not capturable this way; doctor says so. Use x11 through XWayland for X11 apps, or a fallback recorder. --source wayland still forces it
    macOSavfoundationScreen Recording permission granted to the terminal / agent host app; doctor lists screen indexes for --screen-index
    Windowsgdigrabany standard ffmpeg build; powershell for process checks

    Capture is the full screen by default; --geometry WxH and --offset X,Y crop a region on x11, wayland, and gdigrab. XWayland only sees X11 windows, so prefer the wayland source when the app under test is Wayland-native.

  • Crash-safe raw capture: the raw recording is MPEG-TS (raw.ts), so if the recorder is killed hard or crashes, what was captured still probes and renders. stop remuxes or re-encodes it into a standard evidence.mp4.

  • How stopping works: on Linux the recorder is signalled through a pidfd. On macOS and Windows, and on Linux when the kernel or a seccomp policy refuses pidfds, start launches a small supervisor process that owns the ffmpeg child, and stop asks it (via stop.request in the session folder) to interrupt, then terminate, then kill; it writes recorder-exit.json when done. Nothing ever signals a bare PID, so a recycled PID can't be hit. If the supervisor dies while the recorder is still running, stop refuses and tells you which PID to stop by hand. If it died before it could even record which process it started, stop stays blocked until you have checked for a stray recorder yourself and rerun it with --accept-untracked-recorder; the report then carries that caveat.

  • Fallback recorders when doctor reports no capture source (for example Wayland without wf-recorder): cua-driver recording start <dir> / stop (see the cua-driver section), or the OS recorder (macOS: screencapture -v out.mov). On these paths there is no annotation overlay, so keep the annotation protocol as files — an assertions.md listing each setup / test_start / assertion with its result and the approximate video timestamp, exactly as in the headless path.

  • Never present --source test (the synthetic pattern generator) as UI evidence. It exists to smoke-test the toolchain; the repo's tests/test_evidence.py exercises it.

Instructions

1. Prepare the screen

  • Maximize the browser/app window; close popups, notifications, and extra panels.
  • Navigate to the starting state (logged in, correct page) BEFORE recording, unless setup itself is under test.
  • Note the exact revision under test: git rev-parse HEAD and git branch --show-current (or the deployment URL) — the recorder stamps them into the report.

2. Start recording

  • Begin the screen recording before the first meaningful action:

    python3 $EVIDENCE start \
      --output .artifacts/<task-name> \
      --title "<what is being verified>" \
      --commit "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" --branch "$(git branch --show-current)" \
      --environment "<OS / browser / display / deployment>"
    

    It prints JSON with a session path and the chosen source; keep the path (SESSION=...) for every later command. The source is auto-detected and the whole screen is captured; pass --source, --geometry, --offset, --display/--xauthority (X11), --screen-index (macOS), or --output-name (Wayland) only when doctor or the situation calls for it.

  • Add a setup annotation describing the starting context:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type setup \
      --message "Logged in, navigating to connectors page"
    

3. Test via computer use, annotating as you go

  • Perform every interaction through computer use on the live app — the recording captures your session, so the testing and the evidence are the same act. Work at a watchable pace: let the UI settle after each action so state changes are visible on video.

  • At each named test's start, add a test_start annotation in Jest style:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type test_start \
      --message "It should execute the tool directly when permission is 'always'"
    
  • After each check, add an assertion annotation with --result passed, failed, or untested:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type assertion --result passed \
      --message "Tool ran without a permission prompt"
    
  • Rules for assertions:

    • One assertion per meaningful state change — consolidate, don't annotate per UI label.
    • Use "Precondition: ..." assertions to establish starting state.
    • Keep under 80 characters, high-signal (the recorder rejects longer messages).
    • If a test cannot run (missing prerequisite, expired auth window), mark it untested with the reason — never skip silently.
    • The timestamp records when you asserted, not whether it was true — look at the screen before choosing passed.

4. Stop and review

  • Stop recording after the final assertion:

    python3 $EVIDENCE stop "$SESSION"
    

    This stops the capture (gracefully, so the recorder flushes; escalating only if it ignores the request), burns the annotations into evidence.mp4, probes the result, and writes report.md and manifest.json next to it. It prints "verified": true on success; if rendering fails the session is marked finalization_failed — fix the reported cause and run stop again (a retry does not signal the recorder twice). If the recorder process can no longer be signalled safely (it died, or its PID now belongs to another process), the session is marked recorder_lost. Running stop again finalizes whatever video was captured, but only once that recorder process is confirmed gone — if it is still alive, stop it first, or the video would be rendered while still being written.

  • Confirm the recording captured the key moments before sharing: extract a frame at each assertion timestamp (ffmpeg -ss <t> -i evidence.mp4 -frames:v 1 frame.png) and check the state and the label are visible.

  • Fill in the Caveats section of report.md; never leave the placeholder.

5. Post the evidence

  • report.md is the report: what was tested, environment + exact commit, pass/fail per test, caveats. Extend it rather than rewriting from scratch.
  • Post the video + summary as a PR comment (embed in the PR description if it's your PR). gh pr comment cannot attach a local video — upload evidence.mp4 through the PR's comment box in an authenticated browser, or upload it to a host and link it (for example the before-and-after upload adapters). Reopen the comment and confirm the video plays before claiming it is posted.
  • If the task includes a tracker issue and posting there is authorized, attach the same video with a one-line result.
  • Send the report + recording to the requester.

Guardrails

  • The video must show the actual test session being driven live. Never present scripted playback, stitched clips, or synthetic footage as a recording; if the harness lacks computer-use tools but a GUI exists, drive via cua-driver; with no GUI at all, use the headless path instead.
  • Never record a half-covered or tiled window — maximize first.
  • Never record a screen showing secrets, tokens, customer data, or payment details; if a flow requires them, mark it untested and say why.
  • When verifying a fix, show or reference the old failure alongside the new success.
  • Always state the exact commit/branch/deployment tested against.

No computer-use tools? Drive with cua-driver (GUI available)

When a display exists but the agent has no built-in computer-use capability, use cua-driver (macOS / Windows / Linux) as the actuator. It is still you testing the app live — the recording rule holds unchanged; only the input mechanism differs.

  • Verify the setup with cua-driver doctor before recording. If a cua-driver skill is installed, read it and follow its protocol — the snapshot-before-action invariant is mandatory.
  • Loop per interaction: launch_app → get_window_state (accessibility tree
    • screenshot) → act via element_token (click, type_text, press_key) → verify_state for the expected postcondition. Each verify_state check maps 1:1 onto an assertion annotation.
  • Wherever doctor reports capture_ready: yes, keep using the bundled recorder above for the video and the annotations; cua-driver only supplies the input.
  • Otherwise, cua-driver recording start <output-dir> / cua-driver recording stop is the recorder (the output directory is required, and the daemon must be running: cua-driver serve). Video capture is on by default and is finalized to <output-dir>/recording.mp4 on stop — but on Windows/Linux it shells out to ffmpeg, so a missing ffmpeg or display yields only the per-turn trajectory folders (before/after screenshots, action.json, click.png), no video. After stopping, verify recording.mp4 exists before citing it; if it is absent, fix the recorder or present the per-turn before/after screenshots as numbered captures per the headless protocol.
  • If no annotation overlay is available on this path, keep the protocol as files: an assertions.md listing each test_start / assertion with its result, exactly as in the headless path.

Headless path (no GUI available)

When the agent has no desktop to record, keep the same assertion discipline; swap the recorder for scripted capture:

  • Save everything to .artifacts/<task-name>/ (gitignore it — evidence gets uploaded, never committed). Keep the capture script beside the captures so the run is repeatable.

  • Screenshots: the before-and-after CLI (@vercel/before-and-after) captures URLs or elements and its pairs feed PR embeds directly. In containers/VMs where Chrome fails with "No usable sandbox", set AGENT_BROWSER_ARGS="--no-sandbox".

  • Video / multi-step flows: a one-off Playwright script, run without adding playwright to the project's dependencies:

    bash /path/to/evidence-driven-testing/scripts/run-playwright.sh record.mjs
    

    The helper installs the pinned Playwright version from its bundled manifest and lockfile with npm ci in a temporary directory, copies the script beside that installation, installs Chromium if needed, and removes the temporary directory on exit. It preserves the caller's working directory, so relative artifact paths still point into your project. Node 20+ and npm are required; the browser cache remains available for later runs. Keep the script self-contained: relative imports and adjacent data files are not copied. Use the project's existing Playwright setup for scripts with local imports. When upgrading capture tooling, update scripts/playwright/package.json, regenerate its lockfile with npm, and rerun the capture checks.

    npx --package=playwright adds executables to PATH; it does not make the package importable from an arbitrary ESM script. Minimal record.mjs:

    import { chromium } from "playwright";
    const browser = await chromium.launch();
    try {
      const context = await browser.newContext({
        recordVideo: { dir: ".artifacts/<task-name>/" },
      });
      try {
        const page = await context.newPage();
        await page.goto("http://localhost:3000/path-under-test");
        // Drive the flow and check each expected state here.
      } finally {
        await context.close(); // Finalizes the video even if an assertion fails.
      }
    } finally {
      await browser.close();
    }
    

    Trim or compress with ffmpeg if the file is large.

  • The annotation protocol becomes files: number captures in test order with the assertion in the name — 01-precondition-signed-in.png, 02-it-saves-on-blur-passed.png — and keep an assertions.md in the artifacts folder listing each test_start / assertion with its result (passed / failed / untested + reason).

Non-UI changes still need evidence

  • API / performance: a scripted probe with measured numbers — request counts per phase, latency before/after — captured to probe-output.txt.
  • Rendering / canvas / shader: rendered frames plus pixel assertions (diff values), reviewed by eye and saved as PNGs.
  • Agent behavior: the relevant transcript excerpt showing the tool call and response.
  • Bug fixes: reproduce and capture the failure before writing the fix — that capture is the "before" half of a before/after pair.

Capture hygiene

  • Confirm the server you're probing is running your code (right port, right process), especially when multiple agents share a machine: lsof -i :<port> — or where lsof isn't installed, ss -ltnp "sport = :<port>" to find the listener's PID, then ps -p <pid> -o args= to confirm it's yours.
  • Evidence complements the repo's checks (typecheck/build/tests); it never replaces them.
  • Hand before/after media pairs to a before/after tool for the PR embed (e.g. before-and-after before.png after.png --markdown).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

before-and-after

無料概要あり

Webページや画像の変更前後を同じ条件で撮影し、画面の差を比べるためのスクリーンショットと、必要に応じて共有用Markdownを作成します。

  • UI変更の前後を比較したいとき
  • PR用の画面比較資料を作りたいとき
  • 特定のページ要素だけ撮影したいとき
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

code-structure

無料概要あり

複数の機能で重複する処理を整理し、業務ルールを担うアクションと再利用できる処理を担うサービスの分け方や移行手順を示します。

  • 重複した処理を共通化すべきか判断したいとき
  • 業務ルールと共通処理の置き場所を整理したいとき
  • 複数の呼び出し元を段階的にリファクタリングしたいとき
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

greploop

無料概要あり

PRやMRに寄せられたGreptileの指摘を確認し、対象を絞った修正と再レビューを繰り返して、現行リビジョンの評価と未対応事項を整理します。

  • PRのGreptile指摘を修正したいとき
  • MRのレビューを再依頼して確認したいとき
  • Perforceの変更をレビューしたいとき
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

greploop-apps

無料概要あり

通常のトリガーで大きなPRを処理できない場合に、`greploop` のワークフローを `@greptile-apps` トリガーで実行する互換用エントリーポイントです。

  • 大きなPRをGreptile Appsで処理したいとき
  • 通常のトリガーで扱えないPRをレビューしたいとき
  • 既存のgreploopワークフローを指定トリガーで実行
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

new-feature

無料概要あり

機能追加や修正に着手する前に、作業ごとのGit worktreeとブランチを用意し、既存の担当作業や変更範囲を確認して安全に編集を進めます。

  • 機能追加を専用ブランチで始めたいとき
  • 共有チェックアウトを保って修正したいとき
  • 既存PRとの変更範囲を確認したいとき
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

unslop

無料概要あり

コミット文やPR、ドキュメント、返信など、人が読む文章からAIらしい定型表現を取り除き、意味と口調を保ちながら具体的で自然な文に整えます。

  • PR本文を自然な文に整えたいとき
  • コミットメッセージを推敲したいとき
  • ドキュメントの定型表現を減らしたいとき
michaelshimeles/rstack1,3922026年10月26日 更新

michaelshimeles のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する