新しい機能や企画を作り始める前に、対話で目的や希望、制約を整理します。必要に応じて図や試作品で認識を確かめ、作業の規模に合った設計をまとめるスキルです。
- 新機能の目的を明確にしたいとき
- 講演や事業のアイデア整理
- 画面や部屋の配置を見比べたいとき
機能開発を別の作業領域で進めるために、既存の分離状態を確認し、環境標準の機能かgit worktreeで領域を用意。依存関係の準備と開始前のテストも行います。
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
機能開発を独立した作業領域で進めるための準備を行います。まず、すでに分離された領域にいるかを確認し、必要なら実行環境に備わる作成機能を使います。その機能がなければ、ブランチごとに別の作業ディレクトリを持てるgit worktreeを使います。保存先の選択、Gitの管理対象から除外されているかの確認、依存関係の準備、開始前のテストまで扱います。
現在の作業場所から分離して新機能を開発したいときや、実装計画に着手する前の準備に向いています。既存の作業領域を重複して作らず、変更前から存在するテストの失敗も確認できます。
手動作成にはGitが必要です。作成方針の指定がない場合は利用者の同意を確認し、辞退された場合は現在の場所で進めます。プロジェクト内の保存先は除外設定を確認し、未設定なら.gitignoreを更新してコミットします。権限で作成が阻まれた場合は現在の場所で準備を続けます。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Ensure work happens in an isolated workspace. Prefer your platform's native worktree tools. Fall back to manual git worktrees only when no native tool is available.
Core principle: Detect existing isolation first. Then use native tools. Then fall back to git. Never fight the harness.
Announce at start: "I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace."
Before creating anything, check if you are already in an isolated workspace.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
Submodule guard: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also true inside git submodules. Before concluding "already in a worktree," verify you are not in a submodule:
# If this returns a path, you're in a submodule, not a worktree — treat as normal repo
git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null
If GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON (and not a submodule): You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
Report with branch state:
<path> on branch <name>."<path> (detached HEAD, externally managed). Branch creation needed at finish time."If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (or in a submodule): You are in a normal repo checkout.
Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? If not, ask for consent before creating a worktree:
"Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."
Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.
You have two mechanisms. Try them in this order.
The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate, a /worktree command, or a --worktree flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.
Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using git worktree add when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.
Only proceed to Step 1b if you have no native worktree tool available.
Only use this if Step 1a does not apply — you have no native worktree tool available. Create a worktree manually using git.
Follow this priority order. Explicit user preference always beats observed filesystem state.
Check your instructions for a declared worktree directory preference. If the user has already specified one, use it without asking.
Check for an existing project-local worktree directory:
ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null # Preferred (hidden)
ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null # Alternative
If found, use it. If both exist, .worktrees wins.
If there is no other guidance available, default to .worktrees/ at the project root.
MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:
git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null
If NOT ignored: Add to .gitignore, commit the change, then proceed.
Why critical: Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.
# Determine path based on chosen location
path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
cd "$path"
Sandbox fallback: If git worktree add fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.
Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:
# Node.js
if [ -f package.json ]; then npm install; fi
# Rust
if [ -f Cargo.toml ]; then cargo build; fi
# Python
if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then pip install -r requirements.txt; fi
if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi
# Go
if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi
Run tests to ensure workspace starts clean:
# Use project-appropriate command
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail: Report failures, ask whether to proceed or investigate.
If tests pass: Report ready.
Worktree ready at <full-path>
Tests passing (<N> tests, 0 failures)
Ready to implement <feature-name>
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Already in linked worktree | Skip creation (Step 0) |
| In a submodule | Treat as normal repo (Step 0 guard) |
| Native worktree tool available | Use it (Step 1a) |
| No native tool | Git worktree fallback (Step 1b) |
.worktrees/ exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
worktrees/ exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
| Both exist | Use .worktrees/ |
| Neither exists | Check instruction file, then default .worktrees/ |
| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
| Permission error on create | Sandbox fallback, work in place |
| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
| No package.json/Cargo.toml | Skip dependency install |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'm obviously not in a worktree — no need to check" | Run Step 0. Harness-created isolation and submodules both fool eyeballing; the detection commands settle it. |
"git worktree add is quicker than hunting for a native tool" | A native tool (e.g. EnterWorktree) owns placement, branching, and cleanup. Bypassing it is the #1 mistake — it creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage. |
| "The worktree directory is surely ignored already" | Run git check-ignore. An unignored worktree directory commits the whole tree into the repo. |
| "Any directory name works" | Explicit instructions beat an existing project-local directory, which beats the .worktrees/ default. |
| "The workspace is fresh — baseline tests can wait" | A dirty baseline makes every later failure ambiguous. Run the tests now; proceeding past failures is your human partner's call. |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
新しい機能や企画を作り始める前に、対話で目的や希望、制約を整理します。必要に応じて図や試作品で認識を確かめ、作業の規模に合った設計をまとめるスキルです。
superpowersの作業記録を読み、作業の重複や計画逸脱、時間・トークン消費などを調べます。ファイルの行番号を根拠に、経緯を報告書へまとめるスキルです。
互いに依存しない不具合やテスト失敗を別々のエージェントに割り当て、並行して調査・修正するスキル。担当範囲を明確にし、結果の確認と変更の統合まで案内します。
作成済みの実装計画を、同じセッションでタスクごとに実行します。テストの失敗と成功、進捗や判断を記録し、最後にブランチ全体をレビューするスキルです。
実装完了後に全テストを確認し、ローカルでのマージ、Pull Request作成、現状維持を選んで進めます。選択と作業環境に応じてブランチや作業領域を整理します。
コードレビューの指摘を実際のコードや対応環境と照らし合わせ、妥当性を確認します。不明点の整理、根拠を示した返答、修正ごとのテストまで進めるスキルです。