本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-development

Design and build custom Claude Code agents with effective descriptions, tool access patterns, and self-documenting prompts. Covers Task tool delegation, model selection, memory limits, and declarative instruction design. Use when: creating custom agents, designing agent descriptions for auto-delegation, troubleshooting agent memory issues, or building agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skillsスター 671(GitHub 671 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールPlaywright

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB
  • .claude-plugin/plugin.json735 B
  • README.md2.1 KB
  • rules/agent-memory-limits.md1.0 KB
  • rules/agent-pattern.md2.2 KB
  • rules/agent-self-documentation.md2.9 KB
  • rules/custom-agent-descriptions.md2.1 KB
  • rules/custom-agent-instructions.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Development for Claude Code

Build effective custom agents for Claude Code with proper delegation, tool access, and prompt design.

Agent Description Pattern

The description field determines whether Claude will automatically delegate tasks.

Strong Trigger Pattern

---
name: agent-name
description: |
  [Role] specialist. MUST BE USED when [specific triggers].
  Use PROACTIVELY for [task category].
  Keywords: [trigger words]
tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash
model: sonnet
---

Weak vs Strong Descriptions

Weak (won't auto-delegate)Strong (auto-delegates)
"Analyzes screenshots for issues""Visual QA specialist. MUST BE USED when analyzing screenshots. Use PROACTIVELY for visual QA."
"Runs Playwright scripts""Playwright specialist. MUST BE USED when running Playwright scripts. Use PROACTIVELY for browser automation."

Key phrases:

  • "MUST BE USED when..."
  • "Use PROACTIVELY for..."
  • Include trigger keywords

Delegation Mechanisms

  1. Explicit: Task tool subagent_type: "agent-name" - always works
  2. Automatic: Claude matches task to agent description - requires strong phrasing

Session restart required after creating/modifying agents.

Tool Access Principle

If an agent doesn't need Bash, don't give it Bash.

Agent needs to...Give toolsDon't give
Create files onlyRead, Write, Edit, Glob, GrepBash
Run scripts/CLIsRead, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash—
Read/audit onlyRead, Glob, GrepWrite, Edit, Bash

Why? Models default to cat > file << 'EOF' heredocs instead of Write tool. Each bash command requires approval, causing dozens of prompts per agent run.

Allowlist Pattern

Instead of restricting Bash, allowlist safe commands in .claude/settings.json:

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "Write", "Edit", "WebFetch(domain:*)",
      "Bash(cd *)", "Bash(cp *)", "Bash(mkdir *)", "Bash(ls *)",
      "Bash(cat *)", "Bash(head *)", "Bash(tail *)", "Bash(grep *)",
      "Bash(diff *)", "Bash(mv *)", "Bash(touch *)", "Bash(file *)"
    ]
  }
}

Model Selection (Quality First)

Don't downgrade quality to work around issues - fix root causes instead.

ModelUse For
OpusCreative work (page building, design, content) - quality matters
SonnetMost agents - content, code, research (default)
HaikuOnly script runners where quality doesn't matter

Memory Limits

Root Cause Fix (REQUIRED)

Add to ~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc:

export NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=16384"

Increases Node.js heap from 4GB to 16GB.

Parallel Limits (Even With Fix)

Agent TypeMax ParallelNotes
Any agents2-3Context accumulates; batch then pause
Heavy creative (Opus)1-2Uses more memory

Recovery

  1. source ~/.bashrc or restart terminal
  2. NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=16384" claude
  3. Check what files exist, continue from there

Sub-Agent vs Remote API

Always prefer Task sub-agents over remote API calls.

AspectRemote API CallTask Sub-Agent
Tool accessNoneFull (Read, Grep, Write, Bash)
File readingMust pass all content in promptCan read files iteratively
Cross-referencingSingle context windowCan reason across documents
Decision qualityGeneric suggestionsSpecific decisions with rationale
Output quality~100 lines typical600+ lines with specifics
// ❌ WRONG - Remote API call
const response = await fetch('https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages', {...})

// ✅ CORRECT - Use Task tool
// Invoke Task with subagent_type: "general-purpose"

Declarative Over Imperative

Describe what to accomplish, not how to use tools.

Wrong (Imperative)

### Check for placeholders
```bash
grep -r "PLACEHOLDER:" build/*.html

### Right (Declarative)

```markdown
### Check for placeholders
Search all HTML files in build/ for:
- PLACEHOLDER: comments
- TODO or TBD markers
- Template brackets like [Client Name]

Any match = incomplete content.

What to Include

IncludeSkip
Task goal and contextExplicit bash/tool commands
Input file paths"Use X tool to..."
Output file paths and formatStep-by-step tool invocations
Success/failure criteriaShell pipeline syntax
Blocking checks (prerequisites)Micromanaged workflows
Quality checklists

Self-Documentation Principle

"Agents that won't have your context must be able to reproduce the behaviour independently."

Every improvement must be encoded into the agent's prompt, not left as implicit knowledge.

What to Encode

DiscoveryWhere to Capture
Bug fix patternAgent's "Corrections" or "Common Issues" section
Quality requirementAgent's "Quality Checklist" section
File path conventionAgent's "Output" section
Tool usage patternAgent's "Process" section
Blocking prerequisiteAgent's "Blocking Check" section

Test: Would a Fresh Agent Succeed?

Before completing any agent improvement:

  1. Read the agent prompt as if you have no context
  2. Ask: Could a new session follow this and produce the same quality?
  3. If no: Add missing instructions, patterns, or references

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It Fails
"As we discussed earlier..."No prior context exists
Relying on files read during devAgent may not read same files
Assuming knowledge from errorsAgent won't see your debugging
"Just like the home page"Agent hasn't built home page

Agent Prompt Structure

Effective agent prompts include:

## Your Role
[What the agent does]

## Blocking Check
[Prerequisites that must exist]

## Input
[What files to read]

## Process
[Step-by-step with encoded learnings]

## Output
[Exact file paths and formats]

## Quality Checklist
[Verification steps including learned gotchas]

## Common Issues
[Patterns discovered during development]

Pipeline Agents

When inserting a new agent into a numbered pipeline (e.g., HTML-01 → HTML-05 → HTML-11):

Must UpdateWhat
New agent"Workflow Position" diagram + "Next" field
Predecessor agentIts "Next" field to point to new agent

Common bug: New agent is "orphaned" because predecessor still points to old next agent.

Verification:

grep -n "Next:.*→\|Then.*runs next" .claude/agents/*.md

The Sweet Spot

Best use case: Tasks that are repetitive but require judgment.

Example: Auditing 70 skills manually = tedious. But each audit needs intelligence (check docs, compare versions, decide what to fix). Perfect for parallel agents with clear instructions.

Not good for:

  • Simple tasks (just do them)
  • Highly creative tasks (need human direction)
  • Tasks requiring cross-file coordination (agents work independently)

Effective Prompt Template

For each [item]:
1. Read [source file]
2. Verify with [external check - npm view, API call, etc.]
3. Check [authoritative source]
4. Score/evaluate
5. FIX issues found ← Critical instruction

Key elements:

  • "FIX issues found" - Without this, agents only report. With it, they take action.
  • Exact file paths - Prevents ambiguity
  • Output format template - Ensures consistent, parseable reports
  • Batch size ~5 items - Enough work to be efficient, not so much that failures cascade

Workflow Pattern

1. ME: Launch 2-3 parallel agents with identical prompt, different item lists
2. AGENTS: Work in parallel (read → verify → check → edit → report)
3. AGENTS: Return structured reports (score, status, fixes applied, files modified)
4. ME: Review changes (git status, spot-check diffs)
5. ME: Commit in batches with meaningful changelog
6. ME: Push and update progress tracking

Why agents don't commit: Allows human review, batching, and clean commit history.

Signs a Task Fits This Pattern

Good fit:

  • Same steps repeated for many items
  • Each item requires judgment (not just transformation)
  • Items are independent (no cross-item dependencies)
  • Clear success criteria (score, pass/fail, etc.)
  • Authoritative source exists to verify against

Bad fit:

  • Items depend on each other's results
  • Requires creative/subjective decisions
  • Single complex task (use regular agent instead)
  • Needs human input mid-process

Quick Reference

Agent Frontmatter Template

---
name: my-agent
description: |
  [Role] specialist. MUST BE USED when [triggers].
  Use PROACTIVELY for [task category].
  Keywords: [trigger words]
tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash
model: sonnet
---

Fix Bash Approval Spam

  1. Remove Bash from tools if not needed
  2. Put critical instructions FIRST (right after frontmatter)
  3. Use allowlists in .claude/settings.json

Memory Crash Recovery

export NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=16384"
source ~/.bashrc && claude

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

1password

無料

Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in (single or multi-account), or reading/injecting/running secrets via op.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

A股实时行情与分时量能分析。获取沪深股票实时价格、涨跌、成交量,分析分时量能分布(早盘/尾盘放量)、主力动向(抢筹/出货信号)、涨停封单。支持持仓管理和盈亏分析。Use when: (1) 查询A股实时行情, (2) 分析主力资金动向, (3) 查看分时成交量分布, (4) 管理股票持仓, (5) 分析持仓盈亏。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

Scan HTML and JSX for accessibility issues with AI-powered fix suggestions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

Multi-channel ABM automation that turns LinkedIn URLs into coordinated outbound campaigns. Scrapes profiles, enriches with Apollo (email + phone), gets mailing addresses via Skip Trace, then orchestrates email sequences, LinkedIn touches, and handwritten letters via Scribeless. The secret weapon for standing out in crowded inboxes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

accli

無料

This skill should be used when interacting with Apple Calendar on macOS. Use it for listing calendars, viewing events, creating/updating/deleting calendar events, and checking availability/free-busy times. Triggers on requests like "check my calendar", "schedule a meeting", "what's on my schedule", "am I free tomorrow", or any calendar-related operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills6712026年3月7日 更新

sundial-org のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する