本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ccg-docs

Generate, discover, read, and lint CCG documentation. Use when producing Markdown and Wiki snapshots, narrowing broad module questions with search, reading generated docs from configured content roots with get_doc_content, or diagnosing orphan, missing, stale, incomplete, contradiction, dead-ref, and drift findings. Do not use for direct source annotation authoring or exact call-graph analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graphスター 17(GitHub 17 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

ccg-docs — Documentation Discovery

Separate DB-backed discovery from generated-file reads, then validate both the selected evidence and documentation quality.

Routing

TaskTool
Broad question about a moduleMCP search, phrased as a question, then get_doc_content
Focused annotation or symbol keywordccg search or MCP search
Exact generated Markdown bodyget_doc_content
Exact signature or relationshipget_node or query_graph
Regenerate Markdown and Wiki snapshotccg docs --out docs
Audit generated docsccg lint

search is a DB-backed narrowing layer. A question is scored against recorded @intent/@domainRule reasons as well as names, and every hit carries a node_id; it does not read a separately generated retrieval index. Read a file's Markdown with get_doc_content, then use graph tools for exact symbols and relationships. Local MCP clients use ccg serve; self-hosted clients connect to ccg-server over Streamable HTTP.

Discovery Pipeline

Use the ccg skill's Freshness Boundary before relying on graph evidence. If refresh is required, report the gap; do not invoke ccg-build unless the user explicitly names it. search can narrow candidates without generated Markdown:

search(query: "how does a caller get authenticated", limit: 5)

Generate files only when the task needs current Markdown, Wiki output, or get_doc_content:

ccg docs --out docs  # Markdown + wiki-index.json compatibility snapshot
ccg lint             # Documentation quality checks; --strict exits 1 on actionable issues

Content-Root Contract

search returns DB-backed candidates with source file_path values; it does not prove that a corresponding generated Markdown file exists in the filesystem root used by get_doc_content.

  • For the default namespace, get_doc_content resolves file_path beneath the MCP server's configured rag.index_dir (default .ccg).
  • For a named namespace, it resolves beneath {namespace_root}/{namespace}.
  • ccg docs --out docs writes Markdown to docs, but it does not make those files readable beneath the default .ccg content root.
  • To support default-namespace MCP reads, either generate with ccg docs --out .ccg/docs --rag-index-dir .ccg, configure rag.index_dir to a root that already contains docs, or use a direct local file read.
  • For a named namespace, place generated docs beneath that namespace directory before calling get_doc_content.

Pass the selected result's relative generated-doc path to get_doc_content. If the read fails, report the configured-root mismatch; do not guess paths outside the allowed root.

Lint Categories

CategoryMeaning
orphanGenerated doc without matching code
missingCode without generated doc
staleCode changed but doc did not
unannotatedMissing required intent/domain annotation
contradictionDoc contradicts the current signature
dead-refBroken @see reference
incompleteMissing required parameter or return documentation
driftDocumentation structure diverged from code

Quality Checkpoints

  1. Sparse results: add accurate @intent or @index annotations with the ccg-annotate skill.
  2. Stale generated docs: assess graph freshness with the ccg skill. If graph refresh is required, report that the user must explicitly invoke ccg-build; do not invoke it automatically.
  3. Empty answers to a question-shaped search: an empty answer usually means nobody recorded a reason in the area, not that the graph is stale. Confirm namespace statistics and refresh only when the graph is missing or stale.
  4. Missing get_doc_content file: compare the generated-doc path with the configured content root before regenerating.
  5. Exact-answer needs: switch from documentation discovery to get_node, query_graph, or trace_flow.

Boundary

  • Treat search as a narrowing layer, not a guaranteed Top-1 answer.
  • Confirm the selected generated-doc path is readable before treating its body as evidence.
  • Do not hand-edit generator-managed Markdown when the source annotation or generator owns the content.
  • Separate current lint results from pre-existing unrelated findings.
  • Never infer that successful generation to an arbitrary --out directory made the file MCP-readable.

Completion

Report generated Markdown and Wiki-index paths when generation was requested, the configured content root and selected generated-doc path for each document read, namespace and graph freshness, and the exact lint summary or why lint was not run. Record any discovery/read mismatch rather than claiming a candidate body was inspected.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

ccg

無料

Fast read-only code discovery with a bounded code-context-graph search and targeted source verification. Use when an ordinary positive lookup or explanation needs an entry point, recorded intent, known-path inventory, or direct relationship evidence. Do not use for absence, completeness, exhaustive inventory, deep flow or impact analysis, or graph writes; use ccg-search-verify for defensible negative claims, and require explicit invocation for ccg-analyze or ccg-build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

Explicit-only deep analysis of algorithms, feature pipelines, and code relationships with CCG impact radius, bounded flow tracing, callers/callees, git-diff risk, affected stored flows, and cross-namespace references. Use only when the user explicitly names the ccg-analyze skill in the current request. Do not invoke merely because a task asks about a flow, pipeline, impact, caller, or relationship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

code-context-graph — annotation system. AI-driven annotation workflow, tag reference, and annotation search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

Author, refine, and verify CCG annotations such as @intent, @domainRule, @sideEffect, @mutates, @index, and @see. Use when adding business meaning to code, improving annotation-aware code or documentation retrieval, fixing annotation lint findings, checking supported tag syntax, or documenting operational contracts. Do not use for generated Markdown editing or annotations that merely restate symbol names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

ccg-build

無料

Explicit-only graph ingestion for building, updating, migrating, and postprocessing code-context-graph graphs from source visible to the CCG runtime. Use only when the user explicitly names the ccg-build skill in the current request. Do not invoke merely because a graph is missing or stale, annotations need reindexing, or another workflow would benefit from a refresh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

ccg-docs

無料

code-context-graph — documentation generation, RAG indexing, and docs quality linting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tae2089/code-context-graph172026年8月22日 更新

tae2089 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する