本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

atlas-migrations

Authors and runs Atlas database schema migrations - declarative HCL or SQL schema definition with `atlas schema apply` for desired-state apply OR `atlas migrate diff` to generate versioned migrations against a dev DB; `atlas migrate apply` to deploy; `atlas migrate lint` to flag destructive / locking / data-loss patterns; `atlas migrate hash` to detect tampering. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, ClickHouse, SQLite, MariaDB, Snowflake, Oracle, Redshift, Spanner, CockroachDB, Databricks. Use when the user wants Terraform-style declarative DB schema management or modern SQL-first migration linting beyond Flyway / Liquibase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json767 B
  • references/atlas-caveats.md1.4 KB
  • references/hcl-schema.md1.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

atlas-migrations

Overview

Atlas manages and migrates database schemas as code - define the desired schema and Atlas plans, lints, tests, and applies the changes (per atlasgo.io/getting-started). Two operating modes:

  1. Declarative - define desired state in HCL or SQL; Atlas computes diff and applies (atlas schema apply).
  2. Versioned - Atlas generates timestamped migration files from schema diffs (atlas migrate diff); migrations apply forward (atlas migrate apply).

Most production teams use versioned mode for the audit trail; dev loops often use declarative mode for fast iteration.

How to use

Follow Steps 1-9 in order - lint (Step 6) is the gate before apply (Step 5).

Step 1 - Install

Per at-start:

# Homebrew (macOS / Linux)
brew install ariga/tap/atlas

# Docker: nothing to install, mount the migrations directory
docker run --rm --net=host -v "$(pwd)/migrations:/migrations" \
  arigaio/atlas migrate apply --url "$DATABASE_URL"

In GitHub Actions, uses: ariga/setup-atlas@v0 puts the CLI on the runner (Step 8, per at-gha). The getting-started page also lists per-platform binaries with md5 and sha256 checksums; verify the checksum before running a downloaded binary. Prefer these over piping the vendor install script into a shell, which runs unreviewed remote code.

Step 2 - Define schema

Per at-start, schema can be SQL (most common) or HCL. SQL example (PostgreSQL):

-- schema.sql
CREATE TABLE users (
  id serial PRIMARY KEY,
  name varchar(255) NOT NULL,
  email varchar(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
  created_at timestamptz DEFAULT now()
);

For the same schema expressed in Atlas's HCL DSL and guidance on when HCL vs SQL matters, see references/hcl-schema.md.

The dev DB referenced via --dev-url is a temporary scratch database Atlas uses to compute the diff (Atlas applies the desired state to the scratch DB, then computes the migration vs production).

Step 3 - Apply schema (declarative mode)

Per at-start:

atlas schema apply --url "$DATABASE_URL" --to file://schema.sql \
  --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public"

--url = target DB; --to = desired schema definition; --dev-url = scratch DB for diff computation. Atlas prints the planned changes and prompts for confirmation by default.

Step 4 - Generate versioned migrations

Per at-start:

atlas migrate diff initial --to file://schema.sql \
  --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public"

This generates a timestamped migration file in migrations/ (e.g., 20260506120000_initial.sql). Subsequent calls with a new schema generate new migrations against the previous state.

Step 5 - Apply versioned migrations

Verify (gate before applying): run Step 6 lint first and assert it reports no destructive / data-loss findings; if it flags one, fix the migration (add a DEFAULT, split the change, or add a new migration) and re-run lint until clean. Only then apply:

atlas migrate apply --url "$DATABASE_URL"

Atlas tracks state in atlas_schema_revisions table - each applied migration is recorded with its hash, so tampering is detected on subsequent applies.

Step 6 - Lint migrations

Per at-start:

atlas migrate lint --dev-url "..." --latest 1

Lints the most recent migration for: data loss, narrow-column operations (e.g., varchar(50) → varchar(20)), missing default on a NOT NULL add, lock-escalating ops on large tables, schema backwards-incompatibility.

The lint output is the value-add over Flyway / Liquibase - those tools are syntax-only; Atlas knows about destructive patterns.

Step 7 - Hash + integrity

Atlas computes hashes for each migration file. If a developer edits an already-applied migration, atlas migrate apply fails until atlas migrate hash re-syncs (intentional act). This protects against silent migration tampering.

Step 8 - CI integration

- uses: ariga/setup-atlas@v0
- name: Lint migrations
  run: atlas migrate lint --dir "file://migrations" \
    --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" \
    --latest 1
- name: Apply migrations to staging
  run: atlas migrate apply --url "${{ secrets.STAGING_DB_URL }}"

GitHub Action ariga/setup-atlas@v0 provides Atlas in the runner; the atlas-action orchestrator provides PR-comment integration with diff visualization.

Step 9 - Composition with sister tools

Beyond atlas migrate lint, apply adversarial review with team-specific risk policies that Atlas's built-in lint doesn't capture (e.g., "no DROP TABLE without DBA approval").

Worked example

Add a NOT NULL column status to a 40M-row users table:

  1. Edit schema.sql to add status varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active' on users.
  2. atlas migrate diff add_status --to file://schema.sql --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" writes migrations/20260506120000_add_status.sql.
  3. atlas migrate lint --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" --latest 1 passes because the NOT NULL add ships a DEFAULT (a NOT NULL add with no default is flagged).
  4. CI runs the same lint on the PR, then atlas migrate apply --url "$STAGING_DB_URL" records the migration in atlas_schema_revisions.
  5. A teammate later edits that applied file; their atlas migrate apply fails on hash mismatch until an intentional atlas migrate hash re-sync - the tamper guard working as designed.

Anti-patterns and limitations

The failure modes (editing applied migrations, skipping --dev-url, declarative schema apply straight to production, skipping lint in CI, blind atlas migrate hash) and the tool's limitations (partial HCL for some DBMS features, general-purpose lint rules, --dev-url requiring a real DBMS, paid Atlas Cloud) are catalogued in references/atlas-caveats.md.

References

  • at-start - getting-started, install commands, example schema, all atlas commands, supported databases
  • at-gha - ariga/setup-atlas GitHub Action
  • atlasgo.io/docs - full documentation
  • github.com/ariga/atlas - repository
  • flyway-migrations, liquibase-migrations, sqlmesh-migrations - sister tools (Flyway / Liquibase = imperative versioned; SQLMesh = data-pipeline + schema)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する