本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

contract-compatibility-gate

Builds a unified deployment-readiness gate that aggregates verdicts from any combination of Pact `can-i-deploy`, oasdiff (OpenAPI), graphql-inspector (GraphQL), and `buf breaking` (Protobuf), applies severity-aware pass/fail thresholds, and emits a single go / no-go decision with per-finding rationale. Use when authoring a CI step that gates a deployment on cross-protocol contract compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json541 B
  • references/gate-implementation-and-ci.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

contract-compatibility-gate

Overview

Modern services rarely speak just one protocol. A single deployment might depend on Pact verifications (consumer/provider HTTP), OpenAPI compatibility for an external REST surface, GraphQL schema regressions for a public graph, and Protobuf breaking-change checks for internal gRPC. Each tool has its own exit code, its own severity levels, and its own concept of "breaking":

ToolVerdict surface
Pact can-i-deployExit 0 = yes / 1 = no (can-i-deploy)
oasdiff breakingExit driven by --fail-on ERR/WARN/INFO (oasdiff-breaking)
graphql-inspector diffNon-zero on BREAKING; zero on DANGEROUS / NON_BREAKING (gqi-diff)
buf breakingNon-zero on any rule violation in active categories (buf-breaking)

This skill defines a unified gate: collect each tool's structured output, normalize to one record shape, apply a single severity rule, emit one verdict.

When to use

  • A deployment depends on more than one protocol (typical for a service exposing both gRPC + REST, or a frontend consuming both GraphQL and REST).
  • The team wants the verdict in $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY (or equivalent) rather than four separate "❌ pact" / "❌ oasdiff" CI badges.
  • Some checks should be advisory rather than blocking - e.g. block on oasdiff ERR but let WARN pass with a comment.
  • The team wants per-tool ratchet behavior (existing failures grandfathered, new failures block).

If the project uses one protocol only, defer this gate - use the matching per-tool SKILL.md's "CI integration" section directly.

How to use

  1. Identify each protocol's source. For every protocol the deployment consumes, run the matching per-tool skill and capture its output as a CI artifact (see Identify your sources below).
  2. Normalize findings. Flatten every tool's per-finding output into the one record shape (see The unified record).
  3. Classify severity. Map each tool's native severity onto blocker / warn / info (see Severity normalization).
  4. Apply the gate rule. Any non-ratcheted blocker makes the verdict no-go; warnings report but do not block by default (see The gate decision rule).
  5. Emit one artifact and exit. Write a single markdown + JSON summary; a no-go exits non-zero so CI halts. The full gate script, CI wiring, and artifact format live in references/gate-implementation-and-ci.md.

Identify your sources

For each protocol the deployment consumes, pick the tool from the matching plugin skill and ensure its output is captured as a CI artifact (always with if: always() on the upload):

ToolSkillArtifact
Pactpact-contract-testingcan-i-deploy exit code + matrix
oasdiffopenapi-contract-diff--format json array
GraphQLgraphql-schema-regressiongrep-parsed text or JSON action
Protobufprotobuf-compat-checking--error-format json array

The unified record

Flatten every tool's per-finding output into one shape:

{
  "tool":     "oasdiff",
  "protocol": "openapi",
  "finding":  "response-success-status-removed",
  "severity": "blocker",
  "subject":  "GET /pets",
  "message":  "the success response status '200' was removed",
  "ratchet":  false,
  "owner":    "@api-platform"
}
FieldSource
toolpact / oasdiff / graphql-inspector / buf.
protocolpact / openapi / graphql / protobuf.
findingtool-specific rule ID (oasdiff id, graphql-inspector change type, buf rule like FIELD_NO_DELETE).
severitynormalized - blocker / warn / info.
subjectendpoint / type / message + field that's affected.
messagehuman-readable rationale (tool's own message).
ratchetoptional - true if grandfathered; false blocks if severity is blocker.
owneroptional - team/handle responsible for the surface.

Severity normalization

ToolTool severityNormalized
Pactcan-i-deploy exit 1blocker
oasdiffERRblocker
oasdiffWARNwarn
oasdiffINFOinfo
graphql-inspectorBreakingblocker
graphql-inspectorDangerouswarn
graphql-inspectorNon-breakinginfo
buf breakingany rule under active categoryblocker

buf breaking doesn't classify by severity - every violation is treated as a blocker. To downgrade, exclude rules in buf.yaml rather than at the gate level (see protobuf-compat-checking).

The gate decision rule

Pseudocode:

def gate_decision(records, *, allow_warn=True):
    blockers = [
        r for r in records
        if r["severity"] == "blocker" and not r.get("ratchet", False)
    ]
    warnings = [r for r in records if r["severity"] == "warn"]
    return {
        "verdict": "no-go" if blockers else "go",
        "blocker_count": len(blockers),
        "warning_count": len(warnings),
        "blockers": blockers,
        "warnings": warnings,
    }

Default behavior is strict-but-warn-tolerant: any non-ratcheted blocker fails the gate; warnings show up in the report but don't block. For stricter projects, set allow_warn=False.

Worked example

Run the gate on one provider PR end to end. The pets-api provider opens a release PR that (a) removes the 200 response from GET /pets in its OpenAPI spec and (b) deletes Order.amount from orders/v1.proto. The web-app consumer already has a Pact contract verified against production.

  1. Each protocol step runs and writes its artifact (each with || true, so a failing tool still emits its file):
    • pact-broker can-i-deploy for web-app -> production exits 0 - the consumer never read the deleted field.
    • oasdiff breaking --format json records response-success-status-removed on GET /pets at level ERR.
    • buf breaking --error-format json records FIELD_NO_DELETE on orders/v1.Order.amount.
    • graphql-inspector diff records a Dangerous change on Pet.legacyTag.
  2. The gate script normalizes each finding and classifies severity per the Severity normalization table:
[
  {"tool": "pact", "protocol": "pact", "finding": "can-i-deploy-yes", "severity": "info", "subject": "web-app -> production"},
  {"tool": "oasdiff", "protocol": "openapi", "finding": "response-success-status-removed", "severity": "blocker", "subject": "GET /pets"},
  {"tool": "buf", "protocol": "protobuf", "finding": "FIELD_NO_DELETE", "severity": "blocker", "subject": "orders/v1.Order.amount"},
  {"tool": "graphql-inspector", "protocol": "graphql", "finding": "Dangerous", "severity": "warn", "subject": "Pet.legacyTag"}
]
  1. gate_decision finds two non-ratcheted blockers, so the verdict is no-go (blocker_count: 2, warning_count: 1).
  2. The gate emits its summary to $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY and exits non-zero:
# Contract Compatibility Gate - verdict: NO-GO
Blockers: 2
- oasdiff :: GET /pets :: response-success-status-removed
- buf :: orders/v1.Order.amount :: FIELD_NO_DELETE
Warnings: 1
- graphql-inspector :: Pet.legacyTag :: Dangerous

The deployment halts on one verdict even though can-i-deploy alone would have passed. To ship, the provider restores the removed response and field, or marks each finding ratchet: true with a documented migration plan. The full gate script, CI wiring, and artifact format are in references/gate-implementation-and-ci.md.

References

  • pact-contract-testing
  • openapi-contract-diff
  • graphql-schema-regression
  • protobuf-compat-checking
  • can-i-deploy - Pact deployment gate exit codes.
  • oasdiff-breaking - oasdiff severity tiers.
  • gqi-diff - GraphQL Inspector breaking classification.
  • buf-breaking - buf breaking-change category model.
  • Gate script, CI wiring, and artifact format: references/gate-implementation-and-ci.md.
  • data-quality-gate and visual-baseline-gate - sibling gate skills with the same artifact shape.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する