本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ghz-load

Wraps ghz, the gRPC load testing tool, for throughput and latency benchmarking. Covers test invocation (--proto + --call + host:port; or --protoset for compiled descriptors), load parameters (-n total requests, -c concurrency, -r RPS rate limit, -z duration), output formats (json/csv/html/influx-summary for CI consumption), the metrics reported (RPS achieved, latency p50/p95/p99, status-code distribution, errors), and CI integration patterns for regression gating. Use when benchmarking a gRPC service's throughput or detecting latency regressions in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md9.2 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json683 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

ghz-load

Overview

Per ghz.sh/docs/usage, ghz accepts a .proto (or compiled protoset), a method, a host:port, and load parameters, and emits per-request metrics + a summary. This skill wraps ghz for two use cases: ad-hoc throughput measurement and CI regression gating.

When to use

  • New gRPC service - what's the throughput ceiling?
  • Suspected latency regression - quantify before / after a change.
  • CI gate: each PR runs a short ghz pass and fails if p99 exceeds the previous baseline.
  • Capacity planning - at what concurrency does the service hit its CPU/memory ceiling?

Authoring

Install

Per ghz.sh/docs/install:

# Homebrew
brew install ghz

# Go install
go install github.com/bojand/ghz/cmd/ghz@latest

Verify:

ghz --version

Configure a config.json

Per ghz docs, --config=path reads a JSON / TOML config. For reproducibility, commit it to the repo:

{
  "proto": "./proto/user.proto",
  "import-paths": ["./proto", "./vendor"],
  "call": "user.v1.UserService/GetUser",
  "host": "localhost:8080",
  "insecure": true,
  "total": 10000,
  "concurrency": 50,
  "rps": 0,
  "data": {
    "id": "user-1"
  },
  "format": "json",
  "output": "ghz-report.json",
  "skipFirst": 100
}

skipFirst: 100 discards the first 100 requests (cold-cache / warmup). Set per-service.

Running

Basic load test

ghz --proto=./proto/user.proto \
    --call=user.v1.UserService/GetUser \
    --insecure \
    -n 10000 -c 50 \
    -d '{"id": "user-1"}' \
    localhost:8080

Per ghz.sh/docs/usage:

FlagMeaning
--protoPath to the .proto file
--protosetPath to a compiled descriptor set (alternative)
--import-pathsComma-separated proto import paths
--callpackage.Service/Method
--insecure"Use plaintext and insecure connection"
-n, --total=N"Number of requests to run. Default is 200"
-c, --concurrency=N"Number of request workers to run concurrently"
-r, --rps=N"Requests per second (RPS) rate limit"; 0 = unlimited
-z, --duration=NTotal duration (30s, 5m) - alternative to -n
-t, --timeout=NPer-request timeout (default 20s)
-dJSON message payload
-DPath to a JSON file containing the payload

Rate-limited (RPS pinning)

ghz --proto=./proto/user.proto \
    --call=user.v1.UserService/GetUser \
    --insecure \
    -c 50 -z 60s -r 200 \
    -d '{"id":"user-1"}' \
    localhost:8080

Run for 60s, 50 concurrent workers, capped at 200 RPS. Useful for confirming the service can sustain the target rate.

Duration mode

ghz -z 5m -c 100 ...

When testing for stability / soak, -z beats -n - the test ends after N minutes regardless of throughput.

Streaming methods

Streaming RPCs aren't natively load-tested by ghz; it sends one unary call per worker per request. For streaming load see grpc-streaming-test-author.

Parsing results

Summary (default summary format)

Summary:
  Count:        10000
  Total:        20.45 s
  Slowest:      120.34 ms
  Fastest:      2.15 ms
  Average:      10.23 ms
  Requests/sec: 488.94

Status code distribution:

Status code distribution:
  [OK]            9983 responses
  [DeadlineExceeded] 17 responses

Per the status-code catalog in grpc-streaming-test-author (references/status-codes.md), any non-OK is a flag for investigation.

JSON output for CI consumption

ghz --config=ghz.config.json
# Writes ghz-report.json

Schema highlights:

{
  "count": 10000,
  "total": 20450000000,
  "average": 10230000,
  "fastest": 2150000,
  "slowest": 120340000,
  "rps": 488.94,
  "latencyDistribution": [
    {"percentage": 50, "latency": 8000000},
    {"percentage": 95, "latency": 25000000},
    {"percentage": 99, "latency": 80000000}
  ],
  "statusCodeDistribution": {"OK": 9983, "DeadlineExceeded": 17},
  "errorDistribution": {}
}

Latencies are nanoseconds.

Other formats

Per ghz.sh/docs/usage, --format options: summary (default), csv, json, pretty, html, influx-summary, influx-details. Use html for shareable single-file reports; influx-* to ship metrics to InfluxDB.

CI integration

Baseline regression gate

# .github/workflows/grpc-perf.yml
name: grpc-perf
on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - "service/**"
      - "proto/**"

jobs:
  ghz-baseline:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    services:
      service-under-test:
        image: my-grpc-service:pr-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
        ports: [8080]
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - name: Install ghz
        run: |
          curl -L https://github.com/bojand/ghz/releases/download/v0.120.0/ghz-linux-x86_64.tar.gz | tar xz
          # user-owned bin dir on PATH: no sudo, no write to /usr/local/bin
          mkdir -p "$HOME/.local/bin" && mv ghz "$HOME/.local/bin/"
          echo "$HOME/.local/bin" >> "$GITHUB_PATH"
      - name: Warm + load
        run: |
          ghz --config=tests/perf/ghz.config.json
      - name: Restore baseline
        uses: actions/cache@v4
        with:
          path: baseline-ghz-report.json
          key: ghz-baseline-${{ github.base_ref }}
      - name: Compare
        run: python tests/perf/compare-ghz.py baseline-ghz-report.json ghz-report.json

compare-ghz.py checks p99 latency is within +10% of baseline; fails otherwise:

import json, sys

baseline = json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))
current = json.load(open(sys.argv[2]))

def p99(report):
    for entry in report["latencyDistribution"]:
        if entry["percentage"] == 99:
            return entry["latency"]
    return None

p99_baseline = p99(baseline) / 1_000_000  # ms
p99_current = p99(current) / 1_000_000
delta = (p99_current - p99_baseline) / p99_baseline

if delta > 0.10:
    print(f"❌ p99 regressed: {p99_baseline:.1f}ms → {p99_current:.1f}ms ({delta*100:.1f}%)")
    sys.exit(1)
print(f"✅ p99: {p99_baseline:.1f}ms → {p99_current:.1f}ms ({delta*100:+.1f}%)")

Standalone benchmark report

ghz --config=ghz.config.json --format=html --output=ghz-report.html

Generate a single HTML report attached to the PR for human review of distribution shape (long tail, bimodal, etc.).

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
-n 100 for a "load test"Sample size too small; metrics noisyAt least -n 5000 or -z 30s
No skipFirstCold cache / JIT warmup inflates latenciesskipFirst: ~5-10% of total
Unbounded --concurrencyTests the load generator, not the serviceMatch -c to expected production concurrency
Single-payload load testMisses cache / branch-prediction noiseVary -d payloads via -D <file>
Compare summary across runs without statistical contextSingle-run noise → false regressionsRun N=3 times; compare distributions, not single numbers
--insecure against TLS-required servicesConnection failure dominates resultsMatch prod TLS config
Treating non-OK as transport failureStatus codes have meaning per AIP-194Inspect distribution; classify per grpc-streaming-test-author references/status-codes.md
Load-testing on shared CI runnerOther jobs perturb CPU; noisyDedicated runner or isolate via Docker resource limits

Limitations

  • No streaming load. ghz issues unary calls per worker. For server-streaming or bidi load, write a bespoke harness or use grpc-streaming-test-author.
  • No real-world workload mix. All workers call the same method. For realistic load, run multiple ghz processes in parallel with different --call per process.
  • No replay from production traces. ghz is generator-driven, not replay-driven. For replay see vegeta or k6.
  • Latency reported as one-way. Network + serialisation + deserialisation included; can't isolate which dominates.
  • Auth tokens are static. No token-refresh mid-test. Use long-lived test tokens.

References

  • ghz usage: ghz.sh/docs/usage.
  • ghz install: ghz.sh/docs/install.
  • $GITHUB_PATH for a user-owned install dir in CI: GitHub Actions: adding a system path.
  • Status code interpretation: grpc-streaming-test-author (references/status-codes.md).
  • Streaming load (sibling): grpc-streaming-test-author.
  • Other load tools (cross-plugin, HTTP-focused; ghz is gRPC-specific): k6-load-testing, jmeter-load-testing.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する