本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gitlab-ci-test-jobs

Configures GitLab CI/CD test stages - `.gitlab-ci.yml` with parallel matrix, artifact reports (junit, coverage), services (postgres, redis), needs / dependencies between jobs, only/except + rules for trigger filtering, retry policy. Use when the project hosts on GitLab and the team wants idiomatic GitLab CI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitLabPostgreSQL

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json454 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

gitlab-ci-test-jobs

Overview

Configured via .gitlab-ci.yml at the repo root. Structure: stages (sequential phases) → jobs (parallel within a stage) → steps (a job's script: array).

When to use

  • Project hosts on GitLab (self-hosted or .com).
  • Existing .gitlab-ci.yml needs standardization.
  • The team values GitLab's tight VCS / CI / registry / artifacts integration.

Step 1 - Basic test job

# .gitlab-ci.yml
stages:
  - test

test:
  stage: test
  image: node:22
  script:
    - npm ci
    - npm test

Default: runs on every push to any branch. Per-branch / per-MR filtering via rules: (Step 7).

Step 2 - Parallel matrix

test:
  stage: test
  image: node:22
  parallel:
    matrix:
      - NODE_VERSION: ['20', '22']
        OS_IMAGE: ['node:20', 'node:22']
  script:
    - npm ci
    - npm test

parallel: matrix: runs the job once per matrix entry. Use GitLab's matrix syntax for cross-product / explicit include for specific combinations.

Step 3 - Services (PostgreSQL, Redis)

test:
  stage: test
  image: node:22
  services:
    - name: postgres:15
      alias: postgres
      variables:
        POSTGRES_PASSWORD: test
    - name: redis:7
      alias: redis
  variables:
    DATABASE_URL: 'postgres://postgres:test@postgres:5432/postgres'
    REDIS_URL: 'redis://redis:6379'
  script:
    - npm ci
    - npm test

The service hostname is the alias field; reachable from the job container.

Step 4 - JUnit + coverage reports

test:
  stage: test
  script:
    - npm ci
    - npm test -- --reporters=default --reporters=jest-junit
  artifacts:
    when: always
    reports:
      junit: junit.xml
      coverage_report:
        coverage_format: cobertura
        path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml
    paths:
      - junit.xml
      - coverage/
    expire_in: 30 days
  coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*([0-9.]+)%/'

GitLab natively renders:

  • JUnit XML in the MR's "Test summary."
  • Coverage in the MR widget (the coverage: regex parses %).
  • Cobertura coverage as inline annotations on diff lines.

Step 5 - Stages + needs

stages:
  - lint
  - test
  - integration
  - e2e

lint:
  stage: lint
  script: npm run lint

unit:
  stage: test
  script: npm test
  needs: [lint]   # don't wait for stage; run as soon as lint passes

integration:
  stage: integration
  script: npm run test:integration
  needs: [unit]

e2e:
  stage: e2e
  script: npm run test:e2e
  needs: [integration]

needs: enables DAG-style pipelines (newer GitLab feature) - jobs run as soon as their dependencies finish, not waiting for the full stage.

Step 6 - Retry policy

test:
  retry:
    max: 2
    when:
      - runner_system_failure
      - stuck_or_timeout_failure
      - api_failure

Distinguish retry classes:

  • runner_system_failure - runner died; safe to retry.
  • script_failure - test failed; don't retry (masks bugs).
  • unknown_failure - case by case.

Step 7 - Trigger filtering via rules:

test:
  rules:
    - if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == 'merge_request_event'
      changes:
        - 'src/**/*'
        - 'tests/**/*'
        - 'package.json'
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == 'main'
    - if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == 'schedule'
  script:
    - npm test

Modern rules: replaces older only: / except: (still work but deprecated for new config).

Step 8 - Caching

test:
  cache:
    key:
      files:
        - package-lock.json
    paths:
      - .npm/
      - node_modules/
  script:
    - npm ci --cache .npm --prefer-offline
    - npm test

cache: per-job; speeds repeat installs. Pin the key to package-lock.json so cache invalidates on dep changes.

Step 9 - Variables + secrets

variables:
  CI: 'true'
  NODE_ENV: 'test'

test:
  script:
    - npm test
  variables:
    # Job-level overrides
    NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: $CI_NPM_TOKEN

Secrets configured in Project Settings → CI/CD → Variables (masked + protected for sensitive values).

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
retry: 5 on test failuresHides flake; never resolved.retry: when: only for runner / API failures (Step 6).
Hardcoded credentials in .gitlab-ci.ymlSecrets in repo.CI/CD Variables (Step 9).
One mega-stage with all jobsNo parallelism; slow pipeline.Stages + needs (Step 5).
Missing artifact upload on failureFailure debugging needs results.when: always (Step 4).
Default image: for everythingPulls Docker image per job; slow.Pin lightweight default (e.g., alpine:latest for non-build jobs).

Limitations

  • GitLab Runner setup for self-hosted. Initial setup adds ops cost.
  • SaaS quota. GitLab.com free tier has minute caps; private projects have stricter limits.
  • Per-job overhead. Each job pulls images + clones repo; short-lived jobs are inefficient.
  • YAML complexity grows. Large pipelines benefit from include: to split across files.

References

  • GitLab CI/CD docs at docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/.
  • github-actions-test-jobs, jenkinsfile-test-stages - alternatives.
  • ci-test-job-conventions - cross-CI conventions; CircleCI patterns live in its references/circleci.md.
  • junit-xml-analysis - JUnit XML parser.
  • lcov-analysis - Cobertura parser (GitLab's native coverage format).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する