本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

mqtt-tests

Test MQTT v5.0 with Mosquitto broker in CI + paho-mqtt clients - QoS 0 / 1 / 2 delivery semantics, retained messages, Last Will and Testament (LWT), shared subscriptions ($share/group/topic), $SYS topic introspection. Critical for IoT, embedded, and M2M systems where wire-level guarantees matter. Also carries STOMP-over-WebSocket + AMQP 0-9-1 broker testing (Spring / RabbitMQ frame, ack-mode, and exchange/binding tests via Testcontainers) in references/stomp-amqp.md. Use when a product speaks MQTT, STOMP, or AMQP on the wire and QoS 1 / 2 redelivery, retained-message state, LWT, ack-mode, or broker-topology behavior needs a broker-backed test - including smoke-testing a new broker auth / ACL / persistence config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md7.9 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json848 B
  • references/lwt-shared-subs-sys.md3.8 KB
  • references/stomp-amqp.md13.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

mqtt-tests

This skill covers the v5.0 surfaces tests must exercise: QoS 0 / 1 / 2 delivery semantics, retained messages, Last Will and Testament (LWT), shared subscriptions, and $SYS topic introspection - all per the MQTT v5.0 spec.

When to use

  • IoT / sensor / M2M product where MQTT is the wire protocol.
  • Pre-deploy gate: QoS 1 + 2 redelivery semantics correct, retained-message + LWT setup right.
  • Smoke test new broker config (auth, ACL, persistence).

How to use

  1. Stand up an eclipse-mosquitto:2 broker as a CI service on port 1883 with a persistence-enabled config (Step 1).
  2. Wire a paho-mqtt v5 client with callback_api_version=VERSION2 (Step 2).
  3. Exercise the QoS matrix - assert QoS 1 redelivers buffered messages to a reconnecting clean_start=False session (Step 3).
  4. Verify a retained message reaches a late subscriber, then clear it with an empty retained payload (Step 4).
  5. Cover the advanced broker behaviors - LWT on abnormal disconnect, shared-subscription round-robin, and $SYS diagnostics (references/lwt-shared-subs-sys.md).
  6. Use a unique client_id per test and clean up retained state between runs (Anti-patterns).

Step 1 - Run Mosquitto broker in CI

# GitHub Actions service
services:
  mosquitto:
    image: eclipse-mosquitto:2
    ports:
      - 1883:1883
    volumes:
      - ./tests/mosquitto.conf:/mosquitto/config/mosquitto.conf

tests/mosquitto.conf:

listener 1883
allow_anonymous true
persistence true
persistence_location /mosquitto/data/
log_dest stdout

Step 2 - paho-mqtt client setup (Python)

pip install paho-mqtt
import paho.mqtt.client as mqtt

def test_connect_v5():
    client = mqtt.Client(
        client_id="test-1",
        protocol=mqtt.MQTTv5,
        callback_api_version=mqtt.CallbackAPIVersion.VERSION2,
    )
    client.connect("localhost", 1883)
    client.loop_start()
    # ... exercise ...
    client.disconnect()
    client.loop_stop()

Step 3 - QoS matrix tests

Per the MQTT v5.0 spec:

QoSGuaranteeUse
0At most once (best effort, may be lost)High-frequency sensor where loss is acceptable
1At least once (may duplicate)Most application messaging
2Exactly once (slowest, full PUBREC/PUBREL/PUBCOMP handshake)Billing, payments, anything dedup-required
def test_qos1_redelivers_after_disconnect():
    received = []
    sub = mqtt.Client(client_id="sub", protocol=mqtt.MQTTv5,
                       clean_start=False, callback_api_version=mqtt.CallbackAPIVersion.VERSION2)
    sub.on_message = lambda c, u, msg: received.append(msg.payload)
    sub.connect("localhost", 1883)
    sub.subscribe("sensors/temp", qos=1)
    sub.loop_start()
    time.sleep(0.5)

    # Disconnect subscriber, publish messages, reconnect
    sub.disconnect()
    sub.loop_stop()

    pub = mqtt.Client(client_id="pub", protocol=mqtt.MQTTv5,
                       callback_api_version=mqtt.CallbackAPIVersion.VERSION2)
    pub.connect("localhost", 1883)
    pub.publish("sensors/temp", "22.5", qos=1).wait_for_publish()
    pub.disconnect()

    # Reconnect; broker delivers buffered QoS 1 messages
    sub.reconnect()
    sub.loop_start()
    time.sleep(2.0)
    sub.disconnect()
    sub.loop_stop()

    assert b"22.5" in received

clean_start=False is required for the broker to retain offline session state; without it, QoS 1 messages are lost.

Step 4 - Retained message test

Per the MQTT v5.0 spec, "servers store and distribute the most recent message on a topic to new subscribers, enabling state sharing without republishing."

def test_retained_message_delivered_to_late_subscriber():
    # Publisher sets retain=True
    pub = mqtt.Client(client_id="pub", protocol=mqtt.MQTTv5,
                       callback_api_version=mqtt.CallbackAPIVersion.VERSION2)
    pub.connect("localhost", 1883)
    pub.publish("device/status", "online", qos=1, retain=True).wait_for_publish()
    pub.disconnect()

    # New subscriber connects 5s later - still receives retained msg
    time.sleep(5)
    received = []
    sub = mqtt.Client(client_id="sub-late", protocol=mqtt.MQTTv5,
                       callback_api_version=mqtt.CallbackAPIVersion.VERSION2)
    sub.on_message = lambda c, u, msg: received.append(msg.payload)
    sub.connect("localhost", 1883)
    sub.subscribe("device/status", qos=1)
    sub.loop_start()
    time.sleep(1)
    sub.disconnect()
    sub.loop_stop()

    assert received == [b"online"]

To clear: publish empty payload with retain=True.

LWT, shared subscriptions, and $SYS introspection

See references/lwt-shared-subs-sys.md for Last Will and Testament on abnormal disconnect, shared-subscription round-robin ($share/<group>/<topic>), and $SYS broker-diagnostics tests.

Worked example

A sensor gateway publishes temperature to sensors/temp at QoS 1. QA needs to confirm a subscriber that drops offline still receives messages published during the outage.

  1. Connect a subscriber with clean_start=False and subscribe to sensors/temp at QoS 1 (Step 3).
  2. Disconnect the subscriber to simulate an outage.
  3. From a separate publisher, publish("sensors/temp", "22.5", qos=1).wait_for_publish().
  4. Reconnect the subscriber with reconnect() and pump the loop for ~2s.
  5. Assert b"22.5" in received - the broker delivered the buffered QoS 1 message on reconnect.

Result: offline-session persistence is verified end to end. Had the test used clean_start=True, the broker would have discarded the session and the message would have been lost - the exact regression this test guards.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Test only QoS 0 ("works on my machine")QoS 1/2 redelivery bugs shipStep 3 covers matrix
Use clean_start=True then expect persistenceBroker discards session; QoS 1 buffer lostclean_start=False (Step 3)
Skip LWT testStale "online" status persists when clients crashLWT reference
Hardcode same client_id across testsBroker disconnects existing on connect; flakeUnique client_id per test
Forget retained-message cleanupSubsequent test runs see stale statePublish empty retained payload between tests

Limitations

  • MQTT v3.1.1 vs v5.0 differs on Will Properties + reason codes; pin client + broker version per test.
  • Mosquitto auth + ACL are not tested here; enable in a separate test suite if security requirements demand.
  • Some advanced v5 features (request/response, topic alias) require newer paho-mqtt; verify minimum version per the paho-mqtt reference.

References

  • MQTT v5.0 spec - QoS, retained, LWT, shared subscriptions, $SYS
  • STOMP over WebSocket + AMQP 0-9-1 broker testing: references/stomp-amqp.md
  • websocket-tests - alternative for browser-side bidirectional
  • webhook-delivery-tester (qa-notifications) - HTTP alternative for at-least-once delivery

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する