本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

msw-handlers

Authors Mock Service Worker (MSW) request handlers for both browser and Node.js test environments using the `http.get` / `http.post` / `HttpResponse.json` API, wires them via `setupWorker` (browser) or `setupServer` (Node), and manages the test lifecycle (`server.listen` / `resetHandlers` / `close`). Use when the project uses JavaScript / TypeScript and needs to mock fetch / XHR at the network layer for both Vitest / Jest unit tests and Cypress / Playwright integration tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールPlaywright

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(22)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json608 B
  • evals/browser-mocks-wont-run-in-node/criteria.json4.2 KB
  • evals/browser-mocks-wont-run-in-node/task.md3.9 KB
  • evals/cart-flow-never-sees-added-items/criteria.json4.0 KB
  • evals/cart-flow-never-sees-added-items/task.md4.1 KB
  • evals/fetch-stub-hides-request-bug/criteria.json4.4 KB
  • evals/fetch-stub-hides-request-bug/task.md4.1 KB
  • evals/handlers-leak-across-tests/criteria.json3.9 KB
  • evals/handlers-leak-across-tests/task.md3.5 KB
  • evals/legacy-mock-definitions-dont-run/criteria.json4.0 KB
  • evals/legacy-mock-definitions-dont-run/task.md4.4 KB
  • evals/mock-payloads-shipped-to-users/criteria.json3.9 KB
  • evals/mock-payloads-shipped-to-users/task.md3.5 KB
  • evals/retry-and-offline-branches-uncovered/criteria.json4.2 KB
  • evals/retry-and-offline-branches-uncovered/task.md3.8 KB
  • evals/same-fake-account-pasted-in-every-file/criteria.json3.8 KB
  • evals/same-fake-account-pasted-in-every-file/task.md5.3 KB
  • evals/two-mock-sets-drifted-apart/criteria.json3.7 KB
  • evals/two-mock-sets-drifted-apart/task.md3.9 KB
  • evals/unmocked-endpoint-passes-silently/criteria.json4.0 KB
  • evals/unmocked-endpoint-passes-silently/task.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

msw-handlers

Overview

Mock Service Worker (MSW) intercepts HTTP requests at the network layer using Service Workers in the browser and a request- interception adapter in Node.js (msw-getting-started). The same handler set works for both - the test author writes one http.get mock and uses it from Vitest unit tests AND from a Cypress browser test.

When to use

  • The project is JavaScript / TypeScript.
  • Tests need to mock HTTP at the same layer as the SUT - intercepting actual fetch / XHR calls rather than stubbing the HTTP client library.
  • Both browser tests (Cypress / Playwright) and Node tests (Vitest / Jest) need the same mock data - MSW's cross-environment consistency is its key advantage.
  • The team wants per-test handler overrides (server.use(...)) layered on top of project-wide defaults.

If the project is JVM, use wiremock-stubs. For multi-protocol mocking (TCP / SMTP / LDAP / gRPC), see the Mountebank reference in wiremock-stubs.

Install

npm i msw --save-dev

(Per msw-getting-started.)

For browser setup, also generate the worker script:

npx msw init public/ --save

This places mockServiceWorker.js in your public directory; the worker script is what the browser registers to intercept requests.

Authoring handlers

Per msw-getting-started:

// src/mocks/handlers.js
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';

export const handlers = [
  http.get('https://api.example.com/user', () => {
    return HttpResponse.json({ id: 'abc-123', firstName: 'John' });
  }),

  http.post('https://api.example.com/orders', async ({ request }) => {
    const body = await request.json();
    return HttpResponse.json({ order_id: 42, ...body }, { status: 201 });
  }),

  http.get('https://api.example.com/orders/:id', ({ params }) => {
    return HttpResponse.json({ order_id: Number(params.id), status: 'shipped' });
  }),
];

Handler signature: http.<verb>(url, resolver). The resolver receives { request, params, cookies } and returns an HttpResponse.

HttpResponse static helpers

HelperEffect
HttpResponse.json(body, init?)JSON response with Content-Type: application/json.
HttpResponse.text(body, init?)Plain text response.
HttpResponse.error()Network-level error (e.g. simulate offline).
new HttpResponse(...)Full-control raw response.

The init object accepts status, statusText, headers - matching the standard Response API.

Pattern matching

PatternNotes
'https://api.example.com/orders/:id'Path param exposed via params.id.
'/api/orders'Same-origin path; matches relative to current host.
'*\\/orders'Wildcards via standard URL pattern.
/^\\/api\\/orders\\/[0-9]+$/Regex match.

Browser setup - setupWorker

// src/mocks/browser.js
import { setupWorker } from 'msw/browser';
import { handlers } from './handlers';

export const worker = setupWorker(...handlers);

// Start the worker only in development / test
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') {
  worker.start();
}

(Per msw-getting-started.)

In a Storybook + MSW combo, kick off worker.start() from the preview file. For Cypress: register the worker before any test that depends on the mocks.

Node setup - setupServer

// src/mocks/node.js
import { setupServer } from 'msw/node';
import { handlers } from './handlers';

export const server = setupServer(...handlers);
// vitest.setup.js (or jest.setup.js)
import { server } from './src/mocks/node';

beforeAll(() => server.listen({ onUnhandledRequest: 'error' }));
afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers());
afterAll(() => server.close());

(Per msw-getting-started.)

HookWhenPurpose
server.listen()beforeAllActivate mocking.
server.resetHandlers()afterEachClear per-test overrides.
server.close()afterAllTear down; release resources.
server.use(...)Per-testAdd / override handlers for the current test only.

onUnhandledRequest: 'error' is the canonical strict mode - fails the test if the SUT makes any HTTP call that doesn't have a matching handler. Catches "we forgot to mock that endpoint" silently passing.

Per-test handler overrides

import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';
import { server } from './src/mocks/node';

test('handles 500 error gracefully', async () => {
  server.use(
    http.get('https://api.example.com/user', () =>
      new HttpResponse(null, { status: 500 })
    )
  );

  const result = await fetchUser();
  expect(result.error).toBe('server error');
});
// `server.resetHandlers()` in afterEach reverts to the default handlers

This pattern is the canonical way to test error / edge paths without polluting the default-handlers set.

CI integration

# .github/workflows/test.yml
- run: npm ci
- run: npm test          # Vitest / Jest pick up vitest.setup / jest.setup automatically

For Cypress + MSW, also run npx msw init in CI to ensure the service worker script is in public/.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
onUnhandledRequest: 'bypass' (the default before strict mode)Test passes despite the SUT calling unmocked endpoints; real network bleeds in.Always 'error' in CI.
Per-test handler definition (no shared handlers.js)Duplication; drift between tests; hard to maintain.One handlers.js per project; server.use() for overrides.
Forgetting resetHandlers()Handlers leak across tests; later test fails because earlier test's override is still active.Always afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers()).
Using MSW for tests that exercise network errors onlyMSW intercepts at HTTP; for low-level network errors, use HttpResponse.error() or simulate via the test framework.The two are different layers; MSW handles HTTP, lower errors need other tooling.
Mocking the same endpoint in browser AND node setups separatelyDrift; bug fix in one is missed in the other.Single handlers.js consumed by both setupWorker and setupServer.
Including MSW in the production bundleBloat; possibly leaks mocks to real users.Tree-shake by importing only in process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' branches; never import { worker } at top level.

Limitations

  • Service Worker scope. Browser MSW only intercepts requests from the same origin / path scope as the worker registration. Cross-origin requests need explicit handler URLs.
  • Streaming responses. SSE / chunked responses work but are more delicate than JSON; consult MSW docs for the streaming API.
  • No native scenario state. Stateful workflows ("after POST, GET returns the new item") need to manage state in your handlers manually (e.g. with a closure-scoped variable).

References

  • msw-getting-started - install, handler authoring, browser vs node setup, lifecycle hooks, server.use() per-test overrides.
  • MSW Docs - https://mswjs.io/docs/
  • wiremock-stubs - JVM counterpart; its references/mountebank.md covers the multi-protocol alternative.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する