本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

negative-test-generator

Covers the refusal paths a handler already implements but nothing tests - a batch endpoint that must apply all rows or none, optimistic-concurrency version conflicts between two editors, or a delete that deliberately separates who you are from what you may do from the state the record is in. For each happy-path test, produces companions exercising input validation rejection, missing required fields, type mismatches, authorization failures, rate-limit errors, and adversarial payloads from the malicious-payload-bank, emitted as parameterized tests in the project's runner format. Use when code has deliberate error paths and the suite only proves the success case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(23)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json808 B
  • evals/async-export-failure/criteria.json3.8 KB
  • evals/async-export-failure/task.md4.5 KB
  • evals/create-project/criteria.json2.8 KB
  • evals/create-project/task.md2.7 KB
  • evals/delete-authz/criteria.json3.0 KB
  • evals/delete-authz/task.md2.6 KB
  • evals/hostile-search-input/criteria.json4.1 KB
  • evals/hostile-search-input/task.md3.8 KB
  • evals/idempotent-replay/criteria.json3.7 KB
  • evals/idempotent-replay/task.md3.9 KB
  • evals/partial-write-rollback/criteria.json3.8 KB
  • evals/partial-write-rollback/task.md3.8 KB
  • evals/rate-limit-and-quota/criteria.json3.7 KB
  • evals/rate-limit-and-quota/task.md3.5 KB
  • evals/settings-types/criteria.json2.7 KB
  • evals/settings-types/task.md3.1 KB
  • evals/state-transition-conflict/criteria.json3.7 KB
  • evals/state-transition-conflict/task.md3.9 KB
  • evals/webhook-envelope/criteria.json3.8 KB
  • evals/webhook-envelope/task.md4.3 KB
  • references/negative-path-catalog.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

negative-test-generator

Overview

A typical test suite has a happy-path test for every endpoint: "valid input → 200 / created object / etc." What's missing is the rejection path - what happens with malformed input, missing fields, wrong type, unauthorized user, rate-limited request, adversarial payload?

This skill takes a happy-path test and emits its negative companions - one per failure mode. The result is a paired set where every "should accept X" has a sibling "should reject Y" catalog.

When to use

  • A feature has a happy-path test but no error-path coverage.
  • An API endpoint accepts user input without documented rejection testing.
  • A team is migrating from "test only what works" to "test every documented response code."
  • Pairs with gherkin-from-stories (in the qa-bdd plugin) output: every Then-clause's positive assertion gets a negative sibling.

Negative-path categories

For each happy-path test of <verb> <path> with body fields <f1, f2, ...>, generate companions across these categories:

  1. Schema violations - missing required, wrong type, out-of-range, wrong enum, bad format, extra/unknown field, null-where-forbidden, excess length.
  2. Authentication failures - no / expired / malformed / cross-tenant token; expect 401.
  3. Authorization failures - missing permission, IDOR, cross-tenant access; expect 403 / 404.
  4. Rate / quota failures - burst over limit (429), plan quota exceeded.
  5. Conflict / state errors - duplicate (409), optimistic-lock (412), invalid state transition (422 / 409).
  6. Adversarial inputs - XSS, SQLi, SSRF, path traversal, ReDoS, Unicode confusables from malicious-payload-bank. Assert reject (4xx) or escaped output - never that the payload merely "didn't crash".
  7. Server errors - upstream unavailable (502 / 503) or timeout (504) via api-chaos-runner.

Per-pattern test tables and the starter adversarial-payload catalog (with CWE / OWASP references): references/negative-path-catalog.md.

Worked example

Given a happy-path test:

def test_create_order_succeeds():
    response = post('/api/orders',
                    headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {token}'},
                    json={'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 2})
    assert response.status_code == 201
    assert response.json()['order_id']

The skill emits negative companions:

import pytest
from tests.fixtures import token, expired_token, free_tier_token
from tests.payloads import XSS, SQLI

# 1. Schema violations
@pytest.mark.parametrize('body,expected_status,expected_field', [
    ({'qty': 2},                  400, 'sku'),         # missing required
    ({'sku': 'SKU-1'},            400, 'qty'),         # missing required
    ({'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 'two'}, 400, 'qty'),    # wrong type
    ({'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 0},  400, 'qty'),         # below min
    ({'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': -1}, 400, 'qty'),         # negative
    ({'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 1000000}, 400, 'qty'),    # above max
    ({'sku': 'INVALID-SKU', 'qty': 2}, 400, 'sku'),     # unknown enum
])
def test_create_order_schema_rejects(body, expected_status, expected_field):
    response = post('/api/orders',
                    headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {token}'},
                    json=body)
    assert response.status_code == expected_status
    assert expected_field in response.json().get('errors', {})

# 2. Auth failures
def test_create_order_no_token():
    response = post('/api/orders', json={'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 2})
    assert response.status_code == 401

def test_create_order_expired_token():
    response = post('/api/orders',
                    headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {expired_token}'},
                    json={'sku': 'SKU-1', 'qty': 2})
    assert response.status_code == 401

# 3. Authorization failures
def test_create_order_free_tier_blocked_for_premium_sku():
    response = post('/api/orders',
                    headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {free_tier_token}'},
                    json={'sku': 'PREMIUM-1', 'qty': 1})
    assert response.status_code == 403

# 6. Adversarial payloads
@pytest.mark.parametrize('payload', XSS + SQLI)
def test_create_order_handles_adversarial_sku(payload):
    response = post('/api/orders',
                    headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {token}'},
                    json={'sku': payload, 'qty': 1})
    # Either reject (preferred) or escape - never pass through with execution
    assert response.status_code in (400, 404, 422)
    assert '<script>' not in response.text

Output format

## Negative tests for `<endpoint>` - `<verb> <path>`

**Happy path:** `tests/<file>::test_<happy_name>`
**Negative companions generated:** N (across 6 categories)

### Tests by category

| Category               | Count | File                                                |
|------------------------|------:|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Schema violations      |    7  | `tests/<file>::test_<endpoint>_schema_rejects`     |
| Auth failures          |    2  | `tests/<file>::test_<endpoint>_no_token` etc.       |
| Authorization failures |    1  | `tests/<file>::test_<endpoint>_unauthorized`        |
| Rate/quota failures    |    0  | (skipped; rate-limit not yet implemented)           |
| Conflict/state errors  |    1  | `tests/<file>::test_<endpoint>_duplicate`           |
| Adversarial payloads   |    8  | `tests/<file>::test_<endpoint>_handles_adversarial`|

### Skipped categories

- Rate/quota failures: rate limiting not yet implemented; revisit when added.
- Server errors: covered by `api-chaos-runner` in a separate suite.

### Recommended next step

1. Run the new negative tests; expect all to pass given the
   documented behavior.
2. Any failure indicates a real gap - either the validator is
   missing the case OR the assertion is wrong.
3. For passes: commit.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Negative tests that assert vague status codes ("not 200")The test passes if the server returns 500 (a bug); should fail.Always assert specific status: 400 for validation, 401 for auth, 403 for authz, 429 for rate, etc.
Skipping the "wrong type" casesThe most common validator bug class.Always include type-mismatch cases for every field.
One mega-test that covers all negativesFailure attribution unclear; one failure cascades.Parameterize per category; one test function per category.
Negative-path coverage but no _synthetic dataReal-looking PII flows through; compliance issue if logs leak.Use synthetic-pii-generator for any field that could be PII.
Asserting 'error' in response.bodyBrittle; error-message text changes; locale-specific bugs.Assert structured field: response.json()['errors']['<field>'] or response.headers['X-Error-Code'].

Limitations

  • Doesn't auto-detect input domain. The team must declare required fields, types, ranges, and enum values for the skill to generate the matching cases. Use gherkin-from-stories
    • non-functional-requirement-extractor upstream.
  • Server-error simulation requires mocking. Categories 5 and 7 need api-chaos-runner or wiremock-stubs / msw-handlers for the upstream failure simulation.
  • Per-language output styling. Test scaffolding adapts to pytest / Jest / xUnit / JUnit; the skill emits the project's preferred runner format.

References

  • gherkin-from-stories (qa-bdd plugin) - upstream skill producing the happy-path AC.
  • malicious-payload-bank - adversarial payload catalog (category 6).
  • boundary-value-generator - sibling skill for boundary cases.
  • synthetic-pii-generator - for any test data that includes PII.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する