本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

openapi-contract-diff

Diffs two OpenAPI versions for breaking changes (removed endpoints, deleted schemas, narrowed enums, response shape changes) using `oasdiff breaking`, severity-classifies the findings (ERR / WARN / INFO), and gates CI with `--fail-on`. Use when reviewing an OpenAPI spec change in a PR or on a release tag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールDocker

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(12)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json443 B
  • evals/clean-diff-on-a-route-that-was-never-documented/criteria.json5.4 KB
  • evals/clean-diff-on-a-route-that-was-never-documented/task.md11.8 KB
  • evals/every-additive-change-fails-the-build/criteria.json5.0 KB
  • evals/every-additive-change-fails-the-build/task.md10.8 KB
  • evals/friday-spec-pr-the-api-team-calls-cosmetic/criteria.json5.0 KB
  • evals/friday-spec-pr-the-api-team-calls-cosmetic/task.md8.3 KB
  • evals/partner-integration-broke-while-the-check-stayed-green/criteria.json5.4 KB
  • evals/partner-integration-broke-while-the-check-stayed-green/task.md10.1 KB
  • evals/release-gate-printed-go-on-a-removed-200/criteria.json5.2 KB
  • evals/release-gate-printed-go-on-a-removed-200/task.md8.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

openapi-contract-diff

Overview

oasdiff is the canonical CLI for comparing two OpenAPI specifications and reporting breaking changes (oasdiff-readme). It runs over 250 checks against the diff and classifies each finding into one of three severity tiers (oasdiff-breaking):

SeverityMeaning
ERRDefinite breaking change - should be avoided.
WARNPotential breaking change - developers should be aware.
INFONon-breaking change.

This is the schema-driven counterpart to pact-contract-testing: use oasdiff when you don't control the consumers (public APIs, third- party integrations) and need to gate breaking-change shipment based on the spec alone.

When to use

  • The repo defines an OpenAPI 3 spec (openapi.yaml, openapi.json, or split-file equivalent).
  • The team wants a CI gate that fails the build on breaking spec changes between the PR and the deployed version.
  • The API has external consumers (no Pact possible) or the team isn't ready to invest in consumer-driven contracts yet.
  • You need a one-shot review tool for "is this PR going to break consumers?"

Authoring (no authoring - the spec is the contract)

Unlike Pact, oasdiff doesn't add tests to the repo. Instead it consumes two OpenAPI specs and emits a diff. Authoring effort goes into keeping the spec authoritative - i.e. ensuring the OpenAPI file in the repo accurately describes the implementation. Tools that close the spec-vs-implementation gap (Schemathesis, Spectral lint) pair well with this skill but are out of scope.

Install

# Go install (preferred for native CLI)
go install github.com/oasdiff/oasdiff@latest

# Docker (CI-friendly, no Go toolchain required)
docker pull tufin/oasdiff

(Per oasdiff-readme.)

Running

Local diff

oasdiff breaking openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml

(Per oasdiff-breaking.)

By default oasdiff prints colorized text. For machine consumption, use --format:

oasdiff breaking --format json openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml > breaking.json
oasdiff breaking --format yaml openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml
oasdiff breaking --format markdown openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml
oasdiff breaking --format html openapi-old.yaml openapi-new.yaml > breaking.html

Available formats: text (default), JSON, YAML, markdown, HTML, plus single-line (oasdiff-breaking).

Comparing remote specs

The CLI accepts URLs directly:

oasdiff breaking \
  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/.../openapi-test1.yaml \
  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/.../openapi-test3.yaml

(Adapted from oasdiff-readme.)

Docker variant

docker run --rm -t -v "$PWD:/specs" tufin/oasdiff breaking \
  /specs/openapi-old.yaml /specs/openapi-new.yaml

--fail-on for CI gating

The exit code is the gate signal (oasdiff-breaking):

oasdiff breaking --fail-on ERR  ...   # exit 1 on ERR; default behavior most teams want
oasdiff breaking --fail-on WARN ...   # exit 1 on ERR or WARN; stricter
oasdiff breaking --fail-on INFO ...   # exit 1 on any reported change

Default for production gates: --fail-on ERR. Use --fail-on WARN for stricter projects (financial APIs, public SDKs) where even potentially- breaking changes need explicit acceptance.

What counts as breaking

oasdiff ships 250+ checks. The headline breaking patterns (oasdiff-breaking):

  • Endpoint deletion - removing a path or HTTP method.
  • Removed success response - e.g. dropping the 200 from a responses block.
  • Deleted schemas from components.schemas - even if no longer referenced.
  • Enum value removal - removing a value from an enum array. Mark the enum x-extensible-enum: true to treat removals as non-breaking (clients should ignore unknown values).
  • Response shape narrowing - changing a property type from string to integer, removing a required array entry, etc.
  • Request shape widening into required - making a previously- optional request field required.

For the full list, run oasdiff checks to dump the active rule set.

Reading the report

Text output (default) example:

1 changes: 1 error, 0 warning, 0 info
error	[response-success-status-removed] at openapi-new.yaml
	in API GET /pets
	the success response status '200' was removed

JSON output (for downstream parsing):

[
  {
    "id": "response-success-status-removed",
    "level": 3,
    "operation": "GET",
    "operationId": "listPets",
    "path": "/pets",
    "source": "openapi-new.yaml",
    "section": "paths",
    "text": "the success response status '200' was removed"
  }
]

level: 3 is ERR, 2 is WARN, 1 is INFO per the standard oasdiff convention. Pipe to jq for triage:

jq -r '.[] | select(.level==3) | "ERR " + .operation + " " + .path + " :: " + .text' breaking.json

CI integration

GitHub Actions example using the Docker image and the --fail-on ERR default:

# .github/workflows/openapi-diff.yml
name: openapi-diff

on:
  pull_request:

jobs:
  oasdiff:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0   # need merge-base SHA for `git show <base>:openapi.yaml`

      - name: Extract base spec
        run: |
          BASE_SHA=$(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)
          git show $BASE_SHA:openapi.yaml > /tmp/openapi-base.yaml

      - name: Run oasdiff
        run: |
          docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/specs" -v /tmp:/tmp tufin/oasdiff breaking \
            --fail-on ERR \
            --format text \
            /tmp/openapi-base.yaml \
            /specs/openapi.yaml | tee oasdiff-report.txt

      - name: Upload report
        if: always()
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: openapi-breaking-report
          path: oasdiff-report.txt
          retention-days: 14

fetch-depth: 0 is required so the merge-base of the PR resolves; the shallow clone GitHub uses by default doesn't include the merge-base commit.

For a PR comment workflow, generate --format markdown and post via actions/github-script@v7 - the markdown table format includes a clickable per-finding rationale.

References

  • oasdiff-readme - install (Go + Docker), output formats, key flags.
  • oasdiff-breaking - breaking subcommand, severity tiers, --fail-on semantics, breaking-change categories.
  • pact-contract-testing - the consumer-driven counterpart for cases where you control consumers.
  • contract-compatibility-gate - the gate skill that aggregates oasdiff output with Pact and Protobuf verdicts.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する