本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

opentelemetry-trace-assertions

Author trace-shape assertions in tests using OpenTelemetry SDK in-memory exporter - capture spans during test execution, assert on span name + attributes + status + parent-child structure + duration. Cross-language patterns (Python `InMemorySpanExporter` + `SimpleSpanProcessor`, JS `getRecordedSpans()`, Java `OpenTelemetryExtension`); CI integration. Use when a service is instrumented with the OpenTelemetry SDK and downstream alerts, SLOs, or dashboards depend on specific span names or attributes that a refactor could silently drop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(12)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json685 B
  • evals/availability-panel-flat-at-100-through-an-outage/criteria.json6.1 KB
  • evals/availability-panel-flat-at-100-through-an-outage/task.md14.4 KB
  • evals/card-outage-that-paged-nobody/criteria.json5.8 KB
  • evals/card-outage-that-paged-nobody/task.md14.6 KB
  • evals/db-panel-empty-for-a-month-while-tests-stay-green/criteria.json5.5 KB
  • evals/db-panel-empty-for-a-month-while-tests-stay-green/task.md12.7 KB
  • evals/three-acceptance-criteria-one-repo/criteria.json5.1 KB
  • evals/three-acceptance-criteria-one-repo/task.md14.2 KB
  • evals/trace-job-eats-more-wall-clock-than-the-rest-of-ci/criteria.json5.6 KB
  • evals/trace-job-eats-more-wall-clock-than-the-rest-of-ci/task.md13.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

opentelemetry-trace-assertions

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, a trace is "the path of a request through your application" and a span is "a unit of work or operation". Spans form a directed acyclic graph (DAG) via parent-child relationships, all sharing the same trace_id.

When to use

  • Service is instrumented with OpenTelemetry SDK and the team's observability stack (alerts, SLOs) depends on specific span attributes - silent removal of an attribute breaks downstream alerting.
  • Trace-shape changes have caused production incidents.
  • Onboarding new instrumentation needs a regression baseline.

Step 1 - Install (per language)

LanguageInstall
Pythonpip install opentelemetry-sdk
JS/TSnpm install @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node
Java (Maven)<dependency><groupId>io.opentelemetry</groupId><artifactId>opentelemetry-sdk-testing</artifactId></dependency>
.NETdotnet add package OpenTelemetry --prerelease + OpenTelemetry.Exporter.InMemory

Step 2 - In-memory exporter setup (Python)

Per the Python SDK trace docs, use SimpleSpanProcessor for tests because it "passes ended spans directly to the configured SpanExporter" synchronously - no batching, no flush wait:

from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export.in_memory_span_exporter import InMemorySpanExporter
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import SimpleSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry import trace

memory_exporter = InMemorySpanExporter()
tracer_provider = TracerProvider()
tracer_provider.add_span_processor(SimpleSpanProcessor(memory_exporter))
trace.set_tracer_provider(tracer_provider)

# ... exercise code under test ...

spans = memory_exporter.get_finished_spans()
assert len(spans) == 3
memory_exporter.clear()

The clear() call between tests prevents cross-test span leakage.

Step 3 - Span shape assertions

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, spans expose name, attributes, status, and kind:

def test_order_creation_emits_correct_trace():
    with use_tracer():
        create_order(items=[item])

    spans = memory_exporter.get_finished_spans()
    span_by_name = {s.name: s for s in spans}

    assert "order.create" in span_by_name
    order_span = span_by_name["order.create"]
    assert order_span.attributes.get("order.item_count") == 1
    assert order_span.status.status_code == StatusCode.OK
    assert order_span.kind == SpanKind.INTERNAL

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs: span kind values are INTERNAL (in-process), CLIENT (outgoing remote), SERVER (incoming remote), PRODUCER (queue publish), CONSUMER (queue process).

Step 4 - Parent-child structure

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, spans share a trace_id and reference their parent via parent_id. Assert structure (not values - IDs are random per run):

db_span = span_by_name["db.query"]
order_span = span_by_name["order.create"]

# Same trace
assert db_span.context.trace_id == order_span.context.trace_id

# DB is a child of order.create
assert db_span.parent.span_id == order_span.context.span_id

Step 5 - Semantic conventions verification

Per the HTTP semantic conventions docs, required HTTP client span attributes include http.request.method, url.full, server.address, server.port, http.response.status_code, and error.type:

assert http_span.attributes["http.request.method"] == "POST"
assert http_span.attributes["url.full"].startswith("https://api.example.com/orders")
assert http_span.attributes["http.response.status_code"] == 201

Deprecation note: older SDKs emitted http.method (deprecated). Per the HTTP semantic conventions docs, the current key is http.request.method. The OTEL_SEMCONV_STABILITY_OPT_IN env var controls dual-emit during migration. Tests should assert the new keys; failures during SDK upgrade are the signal that instrumentation needs migrating, not that the test is wrong.

Step 6 - JS / TS pattern

import { InMemorySpanExporter, SimpleSpanProcessor } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base';
import { NodeTracerProvider } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node';

const memoryExporter = new InMemorySpanExporter();
const provider = new NodeTracerProvider();
provider.addSpanProcessor(new SimpleSpanProcessor(memoryExporter));
provider.register();

// ... exercise ...

const spans = memoryExporter.getFinishedSpans();
expect(spans).toHaveLength(3);
memoryExporter.reset();

Step 7 - Java JUnit 5 pattern

@RegisterExtension
static final OpenTelemetryExtension otelTesting = OpenTelemetryExtension.create();

@Test
void orderCreateEmitsTrace() {
    createOrder(/* ... */);

    List<SpanData> spans = otelTesting.getSpans();
    assertThat(spans).extracting(SpanData::getName).contains("order.create");
}

OpenTelemetryExtension (from opentelemetry-sdk-testing) auto-resets between tests; no manual clear() needed.

Step 8 - CI integration

Pin the SDK version in test deps. SDK upgrades change attribute keys (see Step 5 deprecation note); pinning prevents trace assertions from silently changing meaning between releases.

# pytest in CI
- run: |
    pip install opentelemetry-sdk==1.29.0
    pytest tests/trace/ -v

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Asserting on exact span IDsIDs are random per runAssert structure (parent.span_id == X.context.span_id), not values (Step 4)
Asserting span count without name lookupBrittle to instrumentation reorderBuild span_by_name dict (Step 3)
Use BatchSpanProcessor for testsAsync batching → flaky get_finished_spans()Always SimpleSpanProcessor for tests (Step 2)
Skip memory_exporter.clear() between testsCross-test span leakage; flakeclear() in fixture teardown (Step 2)
Assert on legacy http.method keysBreaks on SDK upgrade to v1.20+Use http.request.method (Step 5)

Limitations

  • In-memory exporter doesn't catch async-boundary issues across process boundaries - pair with jaeger-trace-tests (Jaeger, Zipkin, or Tempo backends) for end-to-end trace verification.
  • SDK-version drift can change span attribute names; pin SDK version in CI (Step 8).
  • Span links (per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs) are not asserted in this skill's pattern; extend per use case.

References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する