Wraps the vendor-generic payment-gateway sandbox pattern - test credentials, sandbox base URLs / environment switches, deterministic test-card matrices, and gateway-native webhook simulators - with per-gateway references for Adyen test mode, PayPal Sandbox, and Braintree sandbox. Use when testing code integrated with Adyen, PayPal, or Braintree; for Stripe use stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks (one-time payments) or stripe-subscription-billing-test-author (recurring billing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Every major payment gateway ships the same four sandbox primitives, each under a different name:
environment
flag that routes calls to the test stack.This skill is the single entry point for the non-Stripe gateways. The body covers the shared pattern; the per-gateway mechanics live in references/.
| Gateway | Reference | Distinctive sandbox trait |
|---|---|---|
| Adyen | references/adyen.md | Explicit sync-API / async-notification duality; HMAC-validated notifications |
| PayPal | references/paypal.md | Sandbox Business + Personal accounts; dashboard + API webhook simulator |
| Braintree | references/braintree.md | Amount-based magic values; sandbox-only gateway.testing.settle |
| Stripe | stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks | Stripe CLI (stripe listen / stripe trigger); test clocks in stripe-subscription-billing-test-author |
Regardless of gateway, a payment integration suite has the same skeleton:
bt_signature
parsing for Braintree); the suite must reject unsigned and wrong-secret
payloads.payment-flow-test-author.payment-flow-states-reference before
asserting on states.Sandbox credentials are secrets like any other:
jobs:
gateway-tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
- run: npm ci && npm test
env:
ADYEN_TEST_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ADYEN_TEST_API_KEY }}
PAYPAL_SANDBOX_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.PAYPAL_SANDBOX_CLIENT_ID }}
BT_SANDBOX_MERCHANT_ID: ${{ secrets.BT_SANDBOX_MERCHANT_ID }}
Per-gateway variable lists are in each reference.
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Prod credentials in tests | Real settlement / real charges | Sandbox-only keys, per-env config |
| Skip webhook signature validation | Spoofed events trigger fulfillment | Verify per the gateway's scheme |
| Treat the sync API return as final | All three gateways finalize async | Webhook-driven state, per payment-flow-states-reference |
| One happy-path test | Decline / 3DS / fraud paths untested | One test per documented outcome row |
| Hardcoded merchant/account IDs | Per-env accounts drift | Env vars |
| One suite for all gateways | Result-code vocabularies differ | Per-gateway test directory |
payment-flow-states-reference (state machines + 3DS
flows).payment-flow-test-author.stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks,
stripe-subscription-billing-test-author.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。