本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

race-condition-test-author

Build deterministic race-condition tests - identify shared mutable state, drive interleavings via barriers / latches / manual scheduling; use ThreadSanitizer (clang `-fsanitize=thread`) for C/C++ data race detection; run the Go race detector end-to-end (`go test -race`, GORACE tuning, `-count`/`-cpu` stress, goroutine-leak gating with go.uber.org/goleak - references/go.md); use jcstress (`@JCStressTest` + `@Actor` + `@Outcome`) for JVM stress; use Loom virtual-thread interleavings for parallel testing. Use when a defect only reproduces under load on shared in-process state (cache, counter, connection pool, lazy-init singleton), when writing the regression test for a race-condition incident before the fix lands, or when adding `-race` to a Go CI matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(14)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json905 B
  • evals/config-singleton-closed-as-not-reproducible/criteria.json6.1 KB
  • evals/config-singleton-closed-as-not-reproducible/task.md11.3 KB
  • evals/double-charge-that-ci-was-green-through/criteria.json7.0 KB
  • evals/double-charge-that-ci-was-green-through/task.md7.0 KB
  • evals/ingest-pods-oomkilled-while-the-detector-is-clean/criteria.json5.3 KB
  • evals/ingest-pods-oomkilled-while-the-detector-is-clean/task.md7.1 KB
  • evals/nightly-ledger-total-comes-up-short/criteria.json6.5 KB
  • evals/nightly-ledger-total-comes-up-short/task.md6.3 KB
  • evals/three-findings-before-the-friday-release-cut/criteria.json6.7 KB
  • evals/three-findings-before-the-friday-release-cut/task.md7.3 KB
  • references/go.md5.3 KB
  • references/goleak-filter-options.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

race-condition-test-author

Race conditions are the canonical "works on my machine, breaks under load" bug. Tests must drive shared-state access deterministically (barriers, latches) AND non-deterministically (sanitizers, stress) to expose them.

When to use

  • Service handles concurrent requests on shared in-process state (caches, counters, connection pools).
  • Race-condition incident retro: build a regression test before fixing.
  • Pre-release smoke: TSan-instrumented binary catches data races that compile clean.

Step 1 - Identify shared mutable state

Code-review checklist:

  • Static / global / module-level mutable variables
  • Singleton instances with mutable fields
  • Cache structures with read-and-modify ("get-then-set" without CAS)
  • Per-request state stored on shared objects (mutable request context)
  • Connection pools / object pools without internal lock
  • Lazy-init patterns ("if not initialized, initialize")

For each: ask "what if two threads / goroutines / async tasks hit this concurrently?"

Step 2 - Deterministic interleaving via barriers

import threading

def test_lazy_init_thread_safe():
    target = LazyService()  # has private _instance + lazy_get()
    barrier = threading.Barrier(parties=2)
    results = [None, None]

    def worker(idx):
        barrier.wait()  # both threads stop here, then race
        results[idx] = target.lazy_get()

    t1 = threading.Thread(target=worker, args=(0,))
    t2 = threading.Thread(target=worker, args=(1,))
    t1.start(); t2.start()
    t1.join(); t2.join()

    assert results[0] is results[1], "Lazy init created two instances under race"

Barrier ensures both threads start the contended section at the same time - much higher probability of triggering the race than naive threading.Thread().

Step 3 - ThreadSanitizer for C/C++/Go

Per the ThreadSanitizer docs, TSan detects data races at runtime with ~5-15× overhead. For C/C++:

clang -fsanitize=thread -g -O1 program.c -o program
./program

For Go, the native data race detector:

go test -race ./...
go run -race main.go

The full Go workflow - GORACE options (log_path, halt_on_error, history_size), stress amplification via -count/-cpu, go vet loop-capture checks, goroutine-leak gating with goleak, and the CI matrix - is in references/go.md.

Output for a detected race:

WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x... by goroutine 7:
  main.read+0x...
    main.go:42

Previous write at 0x... by goroutine 6:
  main.write+0x...
    main.go:38

Per the ThreadSanitizer docs, adaptive delay injection (TSAN_OPTIONS=enable_adaptive_delay=1) helps surface races at synchronization points.

Step 4 - jcstress for JVM

Per the jcstress docs, jcstress is "the experimental harness ... for the correctness of concurrency support in the JVM."

@JCStressTest
@Outcome(id = "0, 0", expect = ACCEPTABLE, desc = "Initial values")
@Outcome(id = "1, 1", expect = ACCEPTABLE, desc = "Both writes seen")
@Outcome(id = "0, 1", expect = ACCEPTABLE, desc = "Saw partial")
@Outcome(id = "1, 0", expect = FORBIDDEN, desc = "Reordered - bug")
@State
public class CounterTest {
    int x, y;

    @Actor
    public void writer() { x = 1; y = 1; }

    @Actor
    public void reader(II_Result r) {
        r.r1 = y;
        r.r2 = x;
    }
}

@Actor methods run concurrently on different threads; @Outcome classifies observed (r1, r2) pairs. FORBIDDEN outcomes indicate a memory-model violation (in this case, reordering allowed under JMM unless volatile or final).

Run:

java -jar jcstress.jar -m quick CounterTest

Per the jcstress docs: tests are probabilistic; longer runs find more reorderings.

Step 5 - Loom virtual-thread interleavings (Java 21+)

Java 21+ Project Loom enables cheap virtual threads. Use to test many-concurrent-task interleavings without OS thread cost:

@Test
void test_handles_10000_concurrent_orders() throws Exception {
    var orderService = new OrderService();
    try (var executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
        var futures = IntStream.range(0, 10_000)
            .mapToObj(i -> executor.submit(() -> orderService.place(i)))
            .toList();
        for (var f : futures) f.get();
    }
    assertEquals(10_000, orderService.totalProcessed());
}

Virtual threads run M:N on OS threads - the JVM scheduler interleaves them aggressively, exposing schedule-dependent races.

Step 6 - Property-based + concurrency

Combine Hypothesis (Python) / fast-check (JS) with concurrency:

from hypothesis import given, strategies as st
import threading

@given(operations=st.lists(st.tuples(st.sampled_from(["read", "write"]), st.integers()), min_size=10, max_size=100))
def test_counter_property_under_concurrency(operations):
    counter = ThreadSafeCounter()
    threads = []
    for op, val in operations:
        if op == "write":
            threads.append(threading.Thread(target=lambda v=val: counter.set(v)))
        else:
            threads.append(threading.Thread(target=counter.get))

    for t in threads: t.start()
    for t in threads: t.join()

    # Property: final value is one of the written values
    assert counter.get() in [v for op, v in operations if op == "write"]

Cross-ref qa-property-based plugin for property-based test authoring patterns.

Step 7 - CI integration

# Go
- name: Run race detector
  run: go test -race ./...

# C/C++
- name: TSan build + test
  run: |
    cmake -B build -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-fsanitize=thread -g -O1"
    cmake --build build
    ./build/test_runner

# Java
- name: jcstress quick run
  run: java -jar jcstress.jar -m quick -r results/

Note the latency cost: go test -race ~3× slower; jcstress quick mode ~minutes per test class.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
time.sleep(0.001) to "force" interleavingNon-deterministic; flakeUse barriers (Step 2)
Run race tests once and assume greenProbabilistic; some races take hoursMultiple runs OR longer runs OR sanitizers
Skip TSan in CI for "release" buildsRace in release; CI passed without -raceTSan in CI for at least one matrix dimension (Step 7)
Depend on assertion in worker threadThread death silent; main thread sees passUse futures + assert from main
Test only the bug-causing race, not similarOther shared state has same pattern; bugs shipCode-review checklist (Step 1)

Limitations

  • TSan finds only data races (unsynchronized concurrent access), not higher-level race conditions (correct-but-non-atomic multi-step operations).
  • jcstress is JVM-only; no equivalent for non-JVM stacks.
  • Go's -race overhead is real (~5-10× memory); CI matrix budget required.
  • Loom virtual threads (Java 21+) require recent JDK; older versions need OS threads.

References

  • ThreadSanitizer docs - clang -fsanitize=thread, runtime options, adaptive delay
  • jcstress docs - @JCStressTest, @Actor, @Outcome outcomes
  • ThreadSanitizer C++ Manual - github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/ThreadSanitizerCppManual
  • references/go.md - Go race detector + goleak workflow (GORACE, stress, CI matrix)
  • deadlock-detection-harness - sister skill for deadlock-specific patterns
  • async-ordering-tests - sister skill for async/await ordering

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する