本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

semgrep-rules

Configures and runs Semgrep - pattern-based SAST across 30+ languages with the Semgrep Registry rulesets (`p/owasp-top-ten`, `p/default`, `auto`) plus custom YAML rules; integrates `semgrep ci` for PR-blocking gates with `--baseline-commit` diff-aware scanning, per-finding inline `nosemgrep` suppressions, `--exclude` / `--include` path filters, output formats (`--json` / `--sarif` / `--gitlab-sast` / `--junit-xml`), and severity filter (INFO/WARNING/ERROR). Use when the user runs Semgrep, asks about pattern rules, or needs a low-friction SAST gate without semantic-DB setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitLab

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json710 B
  • evals/new-hire-deleted-every-suppression-comment/criteria.json7.7 KB
  • evals/new-hire-deleted-every-suppression-comment/task.md13.4 KB
  • evals/nine-year-old-monolith-about-to-turn-scanning-on/criteria.json7.2 KB
  • evals/nine-year-old-monolith-about-to-turn-scanning-on/task.md11.4 KB
  • evals/pattern-that-would-flag-our-own-sanctioned-helper/criteria.json6.9 KB
  • evals/pattern-that-would-flag-our-own-sanctioned-helper/task.md9.2 KB
  • evals/security-check-passes-a-file-we-planted-a-hole-in/criteria.json6.9 KB
  • evals/security-check-passes-a-file-we-planted-a-hole-in/task.md10.0 KB
  • evals/twenty-two-minute-check-someone-wants-tuned-down/criteria.json6.8 KB
  • evals/twenty-two-minute-check-someone-wants-tuned-down/task.md9.0 KB
  • references/cli-reference.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

semgrep-rules

Overview

Per semgrep.dev/docs/getting-started/quickstart:

Semgrep is a fast pattern-based static analyzer covering 30+ languages with a registry of community + paid rulesets and straightforward YAML rule authoring. The semgrep ci subcommand adds CI-aware features (baseline-diff, organization policies, metrics).

Per semgrep.dev/docs/cli-reference:

"semgrep scan: Local scans without account requirement; doesn't return failing codes by default.

semgrep ci: Pipeline execution with organization policies, diff-aware scanning, returns failing codes on findings."

When to use

  • The repo has a .semgrep.yml / .semgrep/ directory or wants zero-config registry rulesets.
  • The user needs PR-time SAST without standing up SonarQube or CodeQL infrastructure.
  • A team prefers pattern-DSL rule authoring over semantic-database query languages.

Step 1 - Install

Per sg-quick:

# macOS
brew install semgrep

# Linux/macOS
pipx install semgrep
# or
uv tool install semgrep

# Windows (PowerShell)
pipx install semgrep

# Docker (CI-friendly)
docker pull semgrep/semgrep

Step 2 - First scan

semgrep scan --config auto

Per sg-cli, --config auto "Auto-fetch rules from registry based on project." Specific rulesets:

semgrep scan --config p/owasp-top-ten     # OWASP Top 10
semgrep scan --config p/default            # broad community ruleset
semgrep scan --config p/python p/javascript   # multiple

Step 3 - Custom rule authoring

A minimal Semgrep rule in .semgrep.yml:

rules:
  - id: hardcoded-jwt-secret
    pattern: jwt.sign($PAYLOAD, "...")
    message: Hardcoded JWT secret detected
    languages: [javascript, typescript]
    severity: ERROR
    metadata:
      cwe: "CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials"

Pattern operators: pattern, pattern-either, pattern-not, metavariable-pattern, pattern-inside. Validate rule syntax:

semgrep validate --config .semgrep.yml

(Per sg-cli subcommand list.)

Step 4 - CI integration with baseline diff

Per sg-cli: "--baseline-commit=VAL - Show only findings not in specified commit". Diff-aware mode fails only NEW findings on the PR; pre-existing findings are tracked but don't block - critical for legacy adoption.

jobs:
  semgrep:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    container:
      image: semgrep/semgrep
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - run: semgrep ci --baseline-ref=main --sarif --output=semgrep.sarif
      - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
        if: always()
        with: { sarif_file: semgrep.sarif }

Step 5 - False-positive triage (MANDATORY)

Suppression mechanisms in priority order:

MechanismExampleWhen to use
Per-line nosemgrep comment# nosemgrep: hardcoded-passwordJustified single-line exception
nosemgrep block# nosemgrep: rule-id above a code blockMulti-line exception
paths.exclude in configexclude: ["**/*_pb.go"]Generated files / vendored code
Baseline ref--baseline-commit=main (Step 4)Legacy debt; ratchet
Organization-level rule disableSemgrep AppSec Platform UITeam-wide policy

Justification template (mandatory in code):

# nosemgrep: hardcoded-password
# Reason: Test fixture; password never reaches production runtime
# Reviewer: alice@example.com (2026-05-15)
# Expires: 2026-12-15
TEST_PASSWORD = "test-only-password-do-not-deploy"

Per sg-cli severity filter for triage workflow:

semgrep scan --severity ERROR --json   # only critical findings

Cadence: every quarter, audit nosemgrep suppressions for staleness. Expired ones removed; persistent ones reviewed for escalation.

Step 6 - CLI reference (formats, flags, exit codes)

Gate on exit 0 = clean, 1 = findings, 2 = fatal error. The full output-format flags, performance-tuning flags, and complete exit-code table are in references/cli-reference.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
--config=auto everywhereRulesets drift; no ownershipPin specific rulesets (Step 2)
nosemgrep without justificationBecomes invisible debtRequired justification template (Step 5)
No baseline refEvery legacy finding blocks; team disables--baseline-commit=main (Step 4)
semgrep scan in CIDoesn't return failing exit code by defaultUse semgrep ci (Step 1 quote)
Mix --severity ERROR with --baseline-commit poorlyCan mask real new findingsSeverity filter at output stage, not scan stage

Limitations

  • Pattern matching can miss cross-file taint flows; for those, pair with codeql-queries.
  • Registry rulesets evolve; pin specific versions for production.
  • Semgrep AppSec Platform features (org policies, supply-chain scanning) are paid; the OSS engine covers the patterns above.

References

  • sg-quick - install, quickstart
  • sg-cli - full CLI reference, exit codes, all flags
  • semgrep.dev/docs/writing-rules/rule-syntax - custom rules
  • semgrep.dev/docs/semgrep-ci/overview - CI integration
  • sonarqube-rules, codeql-queries, language-native-sast - sister scanners

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する